LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-09-2007, 08:09 PM   #21
zabiqapara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
To learn basic stats you're going to need to take a whole college level course.

BS... I aced AP Stat with all of 4 hours of study and a review book.
zabiqapara is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 08:16 PM   #22
Tveabuti

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
I guess you can read the basics and get a grasp for the concepts but I thought I knew it all before taking the class and the truth is they really do go more indepth. Then again you took AP Stats in High School and I took Stats at a major University so I expect there is a difference in expectations between a high school student and a college student. I realize that AP classes give you partial college credit and I took several but the reality is most colleges won't give a student who took AP classes full credit for taking a college level course.

The reason is because as good as AP classes are they just aren't as in depth as at a real university.
Tveabuti is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 08:24 PM   #23
NofFoomiTot

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
A recent survey indicates that 9 out of 10 statistical analyses are worthess.
NofFoomiTot is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 08:29 PM   #24
glopomcyte

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
It wasn't required at my school for physics majors (but it was required for math majors). And it was the most boring math class I took. Absolutely worthless...
glopomcyte is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 08:38 PM   #25
Anamehuskeene

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
My wife took an intro stats class to pad her average and avoid work.

Half the class failed, she didn't go to a single class, did not read the book and aced the final.
Anamehuskeene is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 08:40 PM   #26
RotsLoado

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
634
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SlowwHand
A recent survey indicates that 9 out of 10 statistical analyses are worthess. Was that result statistically significant?
RotsLoado is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 10:45 PM   #27
TOPERink

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Hm. My statistics textbooks is "Mathematical Statistics with Applications" by Wckerly, Mendenhall and Scheaffer. I have no idea how good it is comparitively. It's certainly a different focus than the text KH mentioned. I used to teach from that - it's a solid book but I wouldn't recommend to anyone with no prior exposure to basic stats.
TOPERink is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 11:21 PM   #28
Sierabiera

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
In my stats course we are using this book:

 shenfelter O., P.B. Levine , et D.J. Zimmerman, S

Statistics and Econometrics. Methods and application. Wiley 2003 [ISBN: 0471107875]

You could also look at this website:
http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html

"The Electronic Textbook begins with an overview of the relevant elementary (pivotal) concepts and continues with a more in depth exploration of specific areas of statistics, organized by "modules," accessible by buttons, representing classes of analytic techniques. A glossary of statistical terms and a list of references for further study are included."
Sierabiera is offline


Old 02-09-2007, 11:59 PM   #29
IrrettelatWet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
Seriously, everybody in physics knows everything taught in any intro stats class, but most never actually took the class.

Any physicist or mathematician can teach himself the entirety of that class in a day or two.
IrrettelatWet is offline


Old 02-10-2007, 12:04 AM   #30
Obebtetibre

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
I had Taylor with some physics classes. I had Rice with my more advanced class (Which was actually mostly probability).

JM
Obebtetibre is offline


Old 02-10-2007, 06:17 AM   #31
fotochicaes

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
I have no idea what 400-level is. (4th year?)

Pretty much.
fotochicaes is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity