Two idiots collide - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**meteeratymn** · 08-17-2006, 10:29 PM

Yeah, maybe, but Moore is on our side

**mr.supervideogoodfd** · 08-17-2006, 10:36 PM

Moore is the type of guy I really don't want on my side.

Meh.

-Arrian

**ballingham** · 08-17-2006, 10:43 PM

**Avoireeideree** · 08-17-2006, 11:39 PM

Originally posted by Arrian
Moore is the type of guy I really don't want on my side.

Meh.

-Arrian Especially on the subway

**rhiniddibiarmr** · 08-17-2006, 11:46 PM

Why would side matter? If he's so much as in the same car...

-Arrian

**estelle** · 08-17-2006, 11:50 PM

Given the OP, what exactly did you expect?? It's not as if we dragged down a potentially high-minded thread to the depths of *gasp* fat jokes.

-Arrian

**whimpykid** · 08-18-2006, 12:08 AM

^BURN!!!!!1

**infollafago** · 08-18-2006, 12:19 AM

I thought it was a spin-off thread, and that there'd be a link to the original in the OP.

**ViagraPriceBuying** · 08-18-2006, 12:29 AM

Normally I won't poke fun at a poster, but it was so hard to pass up a straight line like that.

**secondmortgages** · 08-18-2006, 07:32 AM

rah,

anyway yeah.. you can youtube it too, when I have time I'll post the link myself ...

Anyway my point was, he had 0 craft in his debate against o'reilly. Basically, Bill takes an issue, spins it around and gives you the wrong questions and basically tries to grab on anything he can and basically fight for a stalemate even if in real world he is losing so bad.

But man.. Moore had the same strategy! It was pathetic, and he was worse in it than Bill. They were arguing about semantics, I mean Bill was arguing about semantics, and Moore couldn't get pass it. IT was like, dude, you seriously have no arguments in you pass this? If someone turns few words around and makes it look something else, you can't get around that and attack with other arguments? So basically it comes down to semantics then, because both have weak base for their whole big idea.

Moore didn't even follow the rules of a debate, in which case he shoudl have won, but he didn't, so ... and he had time to try other routes, but no. He was going for populism, which is ok if you're running for the congress or something, but when you're 1-on-1 in a debate, man, issues are fighting issues, not personalities. So that's where the true weights are measured. And even though he is huge and keeps the poor children of the world hungry, he is lightweight.. a true LW.

**verybigf** · 08-18-2006, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by Japher
here's the link to the original

http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...hreadid=156174

That was awesome

**johnuioyer** · 08-18-2006, 05:58 PM

Originally posted by LordShiva

That was awesome glad you caught the reference

it's what I like to call "a passive burn"

08-17-2006, 10:29 PM	#1
meteeratymn Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 503 Senior Member	Two idiots collide Yeah, maybe, but Moore is on our side Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-17-2006, 10:36 PM	#2
mr.supervideogoodfd Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 456 Senior Member	Moore is the type of guy I really don't want on my side. Meh. -Arrian Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-17-2006, 10:43 PM	#3
ballingham Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-17-2006, 11:39 PM	#4
Avoireeideree Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 505 Senior Member	Originally posted by Arrian Moore is the type of guy I really don't want on my side. Meh. -Arrian Especially on the subway Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-17-2006, 11:46 PM	#5
rhiniddibiarmr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 533 Senior Member	Why would side matter? If he's so much as in the same car... -Arrian Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-17-2006, 11:50 PM	#6
estelle Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 505 Senior Member	Given the OP, what exactly did you expect?? It's not as if we dragged down a potentially high-minded thread to the depths of gasp fat jokes. -Arrian Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-18-2006, 12:08 AM	#7
whimpykid Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 611 Senior Member	^BURN!!!!!1 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-18-2006, 12:19 AM	#8
infollafago Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 454 Senior Member	I thought it was a spin-off thread, and that there'd be a link to the original in the OP. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-18-2006, 12:29 AM	#9
ViagraPriceBuying Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 415 Senior Member	Normally I won't poke fun at a poster, but it was so hard to pass up a straight line like that. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-18-2006, 07:32 AM	#10
secondmortgages Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	rah, anyway yeah.. you can youtube it too, when I have time I'll post the link myself ... Anyway my point was, he had 0 craft in his debate against o'reilly. Basically, Bill takes an issue, spins it around and gives you the wrong questions and basically tries to grab on anything he can and basically fight for a stalemate even if in real world he is losing so bad. But man.. Moore had the same strategy! It was pathetic, and he was worse in it than Bill. They were arguing about semantics, I mean Bill was arguing about semantics, and Moore couldn't get pass it. IT was like, dude, you seriously have no arguments in you pass this? If someone turns few words around and makes it look something else, you can't get around that and attack with other arguments? So basically it comes down to semantics then, because both have weak base for their whole big idea. Moore didn't even follow the rules of a debate, in which case he shoudl have won, but he didn't, so ... and he had time to try other routes, but no. He was going for populism, which is ok if you're running for the congress or something, but when you're 1-on-1 in a debate, man, issues are fighting issues, not personalities. So that's where the true weights are measured. And even though he is huge and keeps the poor children of the world hungry, he is lightweight.. a true LW. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-18-2006, 01:30 PM	#11
verybigf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 572 Senior Member	Originally posted by Japher here's the link to the original http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...hreadid=156174 That was awesome Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-18-2006, 05:58 PM	#12
johnuioyer Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 702 Senior Member	Originally posted by LordShiva That was awesome glad you caught the reference it's what I like to call "a passive burn" Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)