General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Nice - I found streaming audio commentary so I can listen to the games at work.
![]() http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006260665,00.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Originally posted by Cort Haus
Wow, Freddie!! - and he almost got a second. England were 3 mins away from winning their group, but now Sweden can win it. That might actually help England if Equador then got a draw or better against Germany, pitching Eq vs Eng in the 2nd round. England would certainly lose to Germany if they met in the next round. But since they play the day after the Germany - Ecuador game then they can tactically throw the match if they decide they'd rather play Ecuador or Germany. ![]() ![]() Or just be unimpressive again. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
But if Walcott never plays, then why not just invite him to every training session, and then sit him in the stands for the matches? Or give him a job as twelfth man, to give the players water bottles as required. Why actually pick him in the squad unless he's going to be used?
I'm well aware that England have only played two games so far, but then Walcott hasn't even been sent to warm up yet. But South Korea vont pwner la France et la Suisse! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Originally posted by duke o' york
But if Walcott never plays, then why not just invite him to every training session, and then sit him in the stands for the matches? Or give him a job as twelfth man, to give the players water bottles as required. Why actually pick him in the squad unless he's going to be used? I'm well aware that England have only played two games so far, but then Walcott hasn't even been sent to warm up yet. But South Korea vont pwner la France et la Suisse! ![]() ![]() What's the Korea thing about, anyway? Do you really rate them, or did you just like their impression of a team that bought the officials in the last WC? |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Originally posted by Stuie
Nice - I found streaming audio commentary so I can listen to the games at work. ![]() http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006260665,00.html Awesome. ![]() Now I can watch the TV, mute the Spanish commentary, and put on the English audio. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
The English team was awful. It's offensive side is uninspired and it's difficult for them to beat even some of the weakest sides in the WC. It's defense hasn't really been tested yet. If they choose to match with Ecuador, we'll all have a great laugh.
To me, the Swedes, although they play pretty much the same way, are more convincing. My bet is on them next match, if they don't start Ibrahimovic (he's awful). If you want to see some real ball, lookout for the next Cote d' Ivoire match. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
I'm not so quick to classify it as a 'poor performance' myself. Sure the finishing was off but there was a lot of good play. None of the 'talking heads' seem to have the experience to realize how difficult it has been at the WC to score against a defensive team that's playing 10 men back which is how both Paraguay and T&T played.
The objective of the group round has always been not to loose and to win one game against the weaker teams by a big margin. Lest we forget, by virtue of their tie with Sweden, T&T still have a chance to go through. I think the England-Sweden game will be a very good show for both teams with England finally thrashing them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|