[Spongebob]

I'd rather not waste my time. Everything I've heard so far just furthers my opinion that the guy is a dis-info agent set to mislead as many people as he can.
ie he's muddying the waters.

The entire pulverization of the building took a few milliseconds--about in the blink of an eye. After that, everything we saw was the sequence of the collapse. You could see the limit of the upward pointing 'crush zone' which pulverized everything. Above it, the building was in tact--the whole top appeared to fall into a cloud of dust. At that point, everything below it was dust--unable to support itself so it all rained down into the street. I haven't seen a better explanation of the destruction than Khalezov's. It even explains the cancer deaths in the clean up crews.

911 is the biggest swindle in human history. Nobody wants to admit they've been swindled. The official story gives us all a way out of this dilemma. I can just see future generations reading about the 911 Fairy Tale, only they'll call it something else. It'll replace the story about the Emperor's New Clothes as a warning against conformity and obedience. Only it will have a tragic ending.

Hatha

[Unlopssesuj]

I remember reading somewhere that an architectural digest said they conducted the largest and most extensive elevator upgrade in all known history just prior to.

Something like a year in duration. Totally unprecedented upgrade.

I also read the elevator shafts allow access to inbetween all the floors to all the structural supports throughout the entire building.

[Aaron757]

Something like 8 stories, or just over 100 feet of 7 disappeared into thin air, as there was pure free fall observed.

If it's falling at the full acceleration of gravity, there's no energy available to do anything else but that.

Picture a football field 100 feet high made of reinforced steel I beams just vanishing. All that material instantaneously vaporized into literally thin air.

[glasscollector]

Hatha, please don't confuse not believing in atomic demolition as buying into the "official" report.
...and you still haven't explained how the outside face of the towers would be able to contain the force of the blast all the way up through the building.

If it were an atomic blast, the energy released would have burst out of the building at ground level....but it didn't do that. Rather, he's trying to say that the force of the blast traveled upward through 80 concrete floors which was somehow easier than bursting through the aluminum outer facade of the building.

I would suggest you watch Khalezov's videos. He explains it quite well. But of course, you don't want to waste your time. Likewise, I don't want to waste my time.

Hatha

[KRbGA0Bg]

I don't have the time to watch videos. I have not watched any of the videos pertaining to nuclear demolition. I don't believe the governments ridiculous story. I don't believe they were brought down by nukes either. The one thing a nuclear blast creates is heat, so much heat that it would have carried the dust far higher and wider than what we see when we watch the videos of the towers falling.

A nuclear blast would have to be perfectly sized to accomplish the demolition without a telltale signature of expanding thermal forces. The concussion itself as earlier stated would have resulting damage to surrounding buildings foundations.

I wonder what Danny Jowenko would have to say about it. We'll never know, since he is dead.

[hoarrimilsora]

The original video that DMac posted is excellent and shows that critical columns probably were cut by nano thermate or whatever it's called, in the demolitions.
A very important and critical step in understanding how they pulled it off, in my opinion.

[DumErrory]

The original video that DMac posted is excellent and shows that critical columns probably were cut by nano thermate or whatever it's called, in the demolitions.
A very important and critical step in understanding how they pulled it off, in my opinion.

I agree. The final conclusion made seems very plausible and probable based on the maintenance recorded during the year prior.

[uaodnabnjz]

OR....we are dealing with area 51 type technology of which we the people have no clue. One thing only is CERTAIN; it WASNT jet fuel.

[glasscollector]

Hatha, can you at least tell me which of the 26 videos explain how a 150KT atomic blast coming out of the ground from a depth of 55meters {not even a football field away, btw} would not have blown the bottom of the building out first, as opposed to any type of chimney effect where the force was contained and directed up through the building?
...and please don't just keep saying that I have to watch hours of video just to get answers to a few questions.

I already know that the outer skin of those buildings could not withstand those types of forces.
...but the WTC picture you posted that looks similar to an underground blast shows the "blast" bursting out of the sides of the tower at the 80th floor. Why could it burst out there and not the floors below?


After all, you are the one who keeps bringing up this theory and you also seem to be very convinced that it is absolute fact, so I assumed you understood it well enough to talk about it.
The way I see it, if a theory can't withstand a bit of scrutiny, it probably isn't valid.

So please keep in mind that I'm merely asking you to defend your extraordinary theory that you imply is rock-solid.
As Gaillo once posted, extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof.

Watch these 3 10 minute segments:


http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...molition_9_26/
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...olition_10_26/
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...olition_11_26/

In prior segments he explains the difference between an air burst (Hiroshima) and an underground burst.

This is NOT my theory. It's Khalezov's. If you have any interest in it, watch all the videos--don't ask me questions you can get the answers to yourself. Or read his book--The Third Truth, which you can download for free.

Hatha

[BEKREUNSEPBERw]

Hatha you promote these theories, you should also be able to defend them!

[glasscollector]

Hatha you promote these theories, you should also be able to defend them!

I also believe in the Quantum Theory of Physics. Nobody asks me to defend that. I believe it because it makes sense to me. Same thing for Khalezov's nuclear demolition theory. Defending these theories is one thing. Getting people to overcome bias against them created by the perpetrators of 911 is something I cannot do, nor will I try to do it. Did you notice some of the arguments here--"I'm not going to waste my time watching these videos?" What good does it do to defend something people have already dismissed? If there is something you don't want to learn, nobody can teach you.

Hatha

[Justlovemy]

When a building starts to fall at freefall speed, the bottom is pulverizing at the same time as the top. The visible pulverization just happened to emerge from the top first. What was happening at the bottom was obscured by a cloud of dust.

You're all over my posts on this like an albatross Joe King. I don't hear better explanations from you--just a determination to discredit what I write about it. What's up with that? What kind of agenda are you following here?


Hatha

thats what got me as how fast the bottom of the building fall