LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-12-2012, 12:49 PM   #1
casinobonuswer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
Utter bullshit. Naturally a collectivist would assert such nonsense.

A DRIVER LICENSE is ONLY required of those operating a business on public property, e.g. taxi driver, chauffeur, bus driver, wrecker driver, OTR truck drivers, moving company driver, UPS driver, etc. - i.e. one who is 'for hire' in the BUSINESS of TRANSPORTATION where they are CARRYING 'goods' or 'passengers' (the term is NOT what you've been lead to believe, look it up for yourself) on public property for compensation. For those who *think* they know (brainwashed? submissive to 'authority' figures?) what they're talking about with regards to this need to look up the definition for and appreciate the term 'traffic'. lol Motorists who are not engaged in commerce on the streets, roads and highways absolutely have no *need* of a DRIVER LICENSE. Anyone who says otherwise is either a moron or a collectivist swine, or both - imo.

ETA: that's what's wrong with this country, too many non-thinking, non-questioning, kowtowing to 'authority' figures, mindless automaton collectivist morons who do exactly what they're told by their 'superiors' while totally disregarding the Law of Nature (God's law) aka 'the perfect law of liberty' (James 1:25).
The reason the Cop asks for a drivers license is because he sees the STATE issued plates. THIS is proof you have admitted to engaging in commerce.
casinobonuswer is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity