General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
http://cofcc.org/2012/06/russian-gen...-africa-claim/
Russian geneticists disprove “Out of Africa” claim Recent fossil discoveries in central Asia have turned the “out of Africa” theory of human evolution upside down. Now two Russian geneticists show that DNA disproves the theory. There findings were published in Advances in Anthropology. The entire article can be read online. Click Here. "... These data, based on the SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymor- phism), along with the data based on the STRs (Short Tandem Repeats), described in this study, are compatible with each other and undeniably indicate that non-African people, bearers of haplogroups from C to T, did not descend from the “African” haplogroups A or B. Their origin is likely not in Africa. "A higher variance of the DNA in Africa, which was a cornerstone of the “Out of Africa” theory, is explained by Figure 3, in which haplogroup A has been evolving (mutation-wise) for 132,000 years, while the non-European haplogroups are much younger. Hence, there is a lower variability in the latter. "The same is related to language variability, which has also been used as an argument of the African origin of non-Africans. We believe that those arguments upon which the “Out of Africa” theory was based were, in fact, conjectural, incomplete and not actually data-driven. Therefore, we are left holding the question of the origin of Homo sapiens. "Based on palaeoarchaeological evidence, the region, where anatomically modern humans have likely originated, is com- prised of a vast territory from Central Europe in the west to the Russian Plain in the east to Levant in the south. Each of these regions is renowned for discoveries of the oldest skeletal re- mains of modern humans dating back to 42,000 – 44,000 ybp. To date, none of these sub-regions has clear and unequivocal advances in this regard"... |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
So...it suddenly all becomes clear....GSUS is working ......for Bill Gates. And that brings us to the big question — why do some people suddenly react to sunlight, which, like air, has been all around us since we were born? “There are lots of factors and triggers involved in photosensitivity,” says senior consultant dermatologist, Dr. V. R. Janaki. “A small percentage of people are genetically prone to it, and it can typically start at any age. Besides, photosensitivity is not that uncommon today, as the use of scented soaps, perfumes, some drugs (anti-malarials, quinolones, some anti-diabetic drugs), along with exposure to sunlight, leads to it.” Symptoms of allergy “Sun allergy can range from a mild-burning sensation in the sun-exposed areas to polymorphous light eruptions,” says Dr. Janaki, adding that the latter manifests itself as anything from a pinpoint to eczematous rash, papule and plaques. “Diagnosis is easy, as the allergic reaction is confined to the sun-exposed areas. In sari-wearing women, for instance, it is the right side of the back and the arms that are chiefly affected; if they wear salwar-kameez, it's the face and both arms…” But Indians are blessed — and that word is not used lightly — with melanin-rich skin (ranging, on average, between type 4 and 6, on a scale of 1 to 6, depending on the melanin content). “The melanin present in the skin itself affords protection,” explains Dr. Janaki. But for the active sufferers — and anybody who has experienced the problem will vouch for its nuisance value — a few simple measures can go a long way towards alleviating the daily suffering. http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-sty...cle3483452.ece ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|