[DoctorBeny]

This is presented for historical study, Eustace Mullins tells his story,
Ezra Pound was locked up and censored for his works.


EZRA POUND UNCENSORED




EZRA POUND, 1943.04.27: HANG ROOSEVELT
http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com...entry-225.html

[...]

I think it might be a good thing to hang Roosevelt and a few hundred yidds IF you can do it by due legal process, NOT otherwise. Law must be preserved. I know this may sound tame, but so is it. It is sometimes hard to think so. Hard to think that the 35 ex-army subalterns or whatever who wanted to bump off all the kike congressmen weren't just a bit crude and simpliste. Sometimes one feels that it would be better to get the job done somehow, ANY how, than to delay execution.

A chair has been founded in the Sorbonne [in Liberated France] to study modern Jewish history, i.e., the role of the kike in modern history. It would be well to have similar chairs in ALL American universities, though Harvard and the College of the City of N. York might find it hard to get the necessary endowments. I don't think there is any American law that permits you to shoot Nic. Butler. It is a pity but so is it. No ex post facto laws are to be dreamt of. Not that Frankfurter or any other damn Jews care a hoot for law or for the American Constitution. But we are not here to uphold Frankfurter or the Jewish vendetta. In the midst of which YOU jolly well are. And every American boy that gets drowned owes it to Roosevelt and Baruch, and to Roosevelt's VIOLATION of the duties of office.

It is on the ground of those violations, those that occurred before Pearl Harbor, that you should impeach him. It is time that the matter was studied. It is time that the practical means for doing the job were made subject of study. It will be difficult insofar as your press and radio are mostly in Chewisch hands.


EZRA POUND, 1943.02.19: KIKOSOPHY
http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-224.htmlMet an American lady on the seafront tother day. Married to an Italian, so she is still thaar on the seafront. Says to me: "That WALLACE, hasn't sense to come in out of the rain."

I seem to recall a report of a Delphian convention about six years ago, when Henry W. was trying to tell 'em something about American agriculture; how you eat more if you grow less, or some such ingenious piece of Jew-brow kikosophy.

[...]

Go, find out politely which political party is worse than the other, if either is, or conceivably could be, worse than the other. Manners will probably be politer in the Republican wigwam. The obvious percentage of kikery will be lower. [*] There will be possibly less humanitarian flimflam. BUT in any case diagnose 'em.

And the first piece of quite foetid bunk to diagnose OUT of the Roosevelt-Wallace synagogue sob stuff is this bunk about FREEDOM, which does NOT include economic freedom.

Take that every day and all day; and whenever an office holder, a sergeant, a chewish staff officer or a member of the cabinet or executive says FREEDOM, point out that his (if it's Wallace) HIS proposed freedom, omits freedom from debt.

We fight for world freedom, says the dead cod in London, over the synagogue radio.

Wallace has the sour faced gall to get up and talk about the freedom of a world in DEBT to America."

[...]
Ezra Pound, "Das Lehkapital", 1942.03.15
http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com...entry-211.htmlThe enemy is Das Leihkapital. Your Enemy is Das Leihkapital, intemational, wandering Loan Capital. Your enemy is not Germany, your enemy is money on loan. And it would be better for you to be infected with typhus, and dysentery, and Bright's disease, than to be infected with this blindness which prevents you from understanding HOW you are undermined, how you are ruined.

The big Jew is so bound up with this Leihkapital that no one is able to unscramble that omelet. It would be better for you to retire to Darbyshire and defy New Jerusalem, better for you to retire to Gloucester and find one spot that is England than to go on fighting for Jewry and ignoring the process.

It is an outrage that any clean lad from the country - I suppose there are STILL a few ENGLISH lads from the country - it is an outrage that any nice young man from the suburbs should be expected to die for Victor Sassoon, it is an outrage that any drunken footman's byblow should be asked to die for Sassoon.

As to your Empire, it was not all of it won by clean fighting. But however you got it, you did for a time more or less justify keeping it, on the ground that you exported good government or better government than the natives would have had without England.

You let in the Jew and the Jew rotted your empire, and you yourselves out-jewed the Jew. Your allies in your victimized holdings are the bunyah, you stand for NOTHING but usury.

And above metal usury; you have built up bank usury, 60% against 30 and 40%, and by that you WILL NOT be saved. Corrupting the whole earth, you have lost yourselves to yourselves.

And the big Jew has rotted EVERY nation he has wormed into. A millstone. Well, an exceptionally good swimmer MIGHT conceivably be cast into the sea with a stone tied round his neck. He might perhaps untie it. If he were a Scotchman, he would remember his jackknife, before being thrown overboard.

You seem to remember NOTHING. It were better you were infected with typhus. As to federal union, or JEW/nion. There is NO question of race in Streit's proposition. It is as proposed a union of slaves, under jewry. Offered by liars and abettors of thieves.

You have stolen land from your late Allies, and land slips from your control. The ONLY conquests of Britain and Rosenfeld are conquests FROM their alleged allies.

All right, say that Franklin Delany swipes ALL South America - to what end? And ruin the United States of America while he is doing it. What's that to you? It is not England's salvation. Will you ever LOOK at the story of empire? You are NOT even in the mercantile system, you are in a fake mercantile system, not even mercantile. It was for a time called mercantile or the mercantilist system and defined as considering the happiness of a nation to consist in the amount of MONEY it owned, and its process to consist in STEALING, welching, pouching the greatest possible amount of same (i.e., of money) from other nations.

That defines the USURY system, the ONLY system Anglo Saxons have known or used in our time.

And it will not save you. NOR will Judaized Russia. Nor will the Kahal, the Jew's central committee of bleeders. WHAT is their system? Unvarying, cheap goods, sweated out of cheap labor, dung dust hurled on the world, the WORLD conceived as sweat shop, to hell with the 8-hour day, down with abundance. DUMPING sweated goods, dumped against any and every nation that pays a just price for labor. That is your ALLY.

And in your past a trail of blood and of infamy. You bought Hessians to kill your own blood in America. You bought 'em from a stinking feudal overlord, who was in the hands of the ROTHSCHILD; that is HISTORY. You stirred up the American savages against your own kin IN America. But now Eden and Cripps have called in the Muscovite, to bum and destroy all Eastern Europe, and kill Finland, for the sake of the stinking Jews nickel mines.

Your infamy is bound up with Judaea. You can not touch a sore or a shame in your empire but you find a Mond, a Sassoon, or a Goldsmid. YOU HAVE NO RACE left in your government.

God knows if it can be found still scattered in England.

IT must be found scattered in England. The white remnants of England, the white remnant of the races of England must be FOUND and find means to cohere; otherwise, you might as well lie down in your grave yards.

You have for years had cheap goods DUMPED in from Russia. Your alliance with Moscow will bring no relief to that wound. Your Jews have ruined your home manufactures. Loans from the city of London, loans to the Orient, interest paid in cheap cotton goods, loans to the South American countries, interest paid in beef from the Argentine, and ruin of English grazing. The laws of durable government have been known from the days of King Wen. When empires go to ROT, they go to rot for known reasons.

The Times, Telegraph, Manchester Guardian, are there to conceal these reasons. Your press is an infamy, has been throughout our time.

The laws of durable government have been known from the days of King Wen, and when the Roman Empire perished it perished from the same follies that your kikes, your Rothschilds, Beits, Sieffs, Schiffs, and Goldsmids have squirted into your veins.

Cheap grain dumped from Egypt, ruin of the Italian farming, usury, and more usury, THAT is the answer.

For two centuries, ever since the brute Cromwell brought 'em back into England, the kikes have sucked out your vitals. A mild penetration, for a hundred years they have bootlicked your nobility and now where is your nobility? You had at least the semblance of control; you had, let us say, some influence with the Lords of Judaea as long as they WANTED your titles, as long as Levy Levinstein Lawson WANTED to be addressed as Lord Burnham. You could turn the worst edge of their avarice, or rather you could turn it OFF, the upper or huppar clawses; and turn it ONTO the peer. As you did without mercy.

But when the same scroungers have moved over to New York City, how will you manage 'em? The same bloody minded extortioners, or their descendents. The same FINANCIAL HOUSES. The same Rothschilds who plotted with Sherman, and Vandergould to KILL the American nation, who betrayed the United States in the "sixties". Head office in London, agents in the U.S. of America.

Now the address is altered. Main office in Wall Street and Cohen in London. You send Willie over to spy on us. You send 5000 usurers' pimps over to Washington and give special passports, diplomatic, to inveigle the United States into your plans to get cannon fodder from Idaho and from Iowa to weld your slaves cellar on Europe. And this time you get dumped into the ash can.

You have even forgotten your Kipling. Pig Baldwin has forgotten his cousin; if his obscene and treacherous mind ever grasped the meaning of Rudyard's stories. Let me recall one passage to the sow face:

"The Americans," wrote Rudyard, "obligingly slaughtered each other in order that the Czechoslovaks might inherit Boston Common." Cras tibi, tomorrow is your turn. Damn it all, you slaughtered the flower of England in the Boer War. Then in 1914 in the first three months, the best of you went out and got slaughtered.

. . .been seen only too clearly. And your foul papers, the filth of your newsprint has been subsidized to keep your minds off it.

A dirty bit of meat by the name of Gollancz has used your book trade to conceal it. You have almost NO means of communication.

When a Brooks Adams writes five volumes that would help you to see it, six copies reach England. You have LOST the health of the mind. God knows how the scattered handful of Englishmen still in England can still speak one with another.

I see NO remedy in your parliament. I don't mean as parliament. I mean in the personnel. It is your problem. You do not NOW even elect your own parliament. Whether WITH an election you could get anything save old dead meat, I do not know. During the last war a few men had a glimmer of instinct. On whatever formula, they called it pacifism. Was it? All of 'em I ever met were pugnacious. Was it an instinct to save the butt end of the RACE by not fighting? Is it a mistake to combat Germans by force?

Is there a RACE left in England? Has it ANY will left to survive? You can carry slaughter to Ireland. Will that save you? I doubt it. Nothing can save you, save a purge. Nothing can save you, save an affirmation that you are English.

Whore Belisha is NOT. Isaccs is not. No Sassoon is an Englishman, racially. No Rothschild is English, no Strakosch is English, no Roosevelt is English, no Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Baruch, Schiff, Sieff, or Solomon was ever yet bom Anglo-Saxon.

And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you have murdered your empire, and it is this filth that elects your politicians.

You have lost your tradition. You have not even learned what Lord Byron told you. You are, as even that foul rag the Times tells you, a little late in making a start.

In the year 1942 Anno Domini, there is only one start you can make. And that is a start toward being England. A refusal to be a province of Israel, or an outpost of Yankee-Judaea.

Quando tutti saremo forti.


EZRA POUND: US TROOPS GO HOME!

http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com...entry-212.html


EZRA POUND: "30 YEARS WAR..."

Wartime Broadcast from Italy
http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com...entry-210.html


Letter from Rapallo

By EZRA POUND
Special to The Japan Times
Aug. 12, 1940
http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com...entry-207.html

[bp9QxekG]

I studied literature in college and this information never, ever came up about Pound. In fact, I have only found out about it recently.

Pound was a contemporary of D.H. Lawrence, another English writer who also had his books banned and even burned. He and his unpopularly German wife were under house arrest during WWI and repeatedly hassled by armed forces officials.

One of France's greatest modern writers, Louis Ferdinand Celine, is hardly taught at all because he wrote anti-semitic tracts before and during WWII (even though his novels make no reference to Jews).

Fifty years after his death the MSM still can't give it a rest:

Should France Honor Great Writing, Despite its Anti-Semitic Author?

[Kayacterype]

Brilliant stuff. I wonder if anyone has published his collected works and letters.

I've been reading Mullins' History of the Jews and it is a real eye opener.

[DoctorBeny]

I studied literature in college and this information never, ever came up about Pound. In fact, I have only found out about it recently.

Pound was a contemporary of D.H. Lawrence, another English writer who also had his books banned and even burned. He and his unpopularly German wife were under house arrest during WWI and repeatedly hassled by armed forces officials.

One of France's greatest modern writers, Louis Ferdinand Celine, is hardly taught at all because he wrote anti-semitic tracts before and during WWII (even though his novels make no reference to Jews).

Fifty years after his death the MSM still can't give it a rest:

Should France Honor Great Writing, Despite its Anti-Semitic Author?

Almost all the great writers and other people of status had something to say
at one point. Let's censor them all, ban them, they are doing that and rewriting
history in the process. It is quite ridiculous at times.

Ezra Pound was a rebel, he commissioned Eustace Mullins to research
the Federal Reserve, beyond money, leads to Occult, Jews, Conspiracy, ...

Ezra Pound the giant has not been totally banned but his history has.

This is a great way to introduce people to these topics.

He was institutionalized and silenced, destroyed by the FEDS, and no one
can speak about his young assistant Eustace Mullins without being attacked.

Ezra Pound was also a great fan of the Romans/Byzantines.

On the old gim many of us were students of Ezra Pound and Eustace Mullins
and did our own related research, and we haven't stopped.

Eustace Mullins: NEW HISTORY OF THE JEWS

[blackjackblax]

well, Time is part of Time-Warner, as in Warner Brothers, as in 4 Jews who stole Edison's invention then moved to California to start Hollywood and to make it harder for Edison to litigate.

"This writer spent the last years of his life in anti-Semitic madness" - from a Jewish group-think point of view. obviously some Jewish people manage to escape their own madness.

interesting how people wake up to the Talmud worshippers later in life. i envy the people who are taught by their parents or simply wake up earlier in life.


my father was aware of Jews and was anti-Israel. but for some reason he didn't talk about it much. i would have been grateful.

[lapyignipinge]

bump...

[bp9QxekG]

Out of curiosity I googled Ezra Pound and "best poems," and of course a lot of sites came up. Most of them don't provide much of a biography, but this one did; it's pretty shocking to read what happened to him:


By the 1930s, Pound was writing about banking and economic systems, and incorporating into the Cantos his own ideas about usury, which he identified as an exploitative economic system. Froula noted that the Cantos was "a verbal war against economic corruption, against literal wars, against materialism, against habits of mind that permit the perpetuation of political domination. It advocates economic reform as the basis of social and cultural reform, and it could not have held aloof from political reality."

Pound himself was also not aloof from political reality. An admirer of Mussolini, he lived in fascist Italy beginning in 1925. When World War II broke out, Pound stayed in Italy, retaining his U.S. citizenship, and broadcasting a series of controversial radio commentaries. These commentaries often attacked Roosevelt and the Jewish bankers whom Pound held responsible for the war. By 1943 the U.S. government deemed the broadcasts to be treasonous; at war's end the poet was arrested by the U.S. Army and kept imprisoned in a small, outdoor wire cage at a compound near Pisa, Italy. For several weeks during that hot summer, Pound was confined to the cage. [] At night floodlights lit his prison. Eventually judged to be mentally incompetent to stand trial, Pound was incarcerated in St. Elizabeth's Hospital in Washington, D.C. He stayed in the hospital until 1958 when Robert Frost led a successful effort to free the poet. Ironically, while imprisoned by the army in Italy, Pound completed the "Pisan Cantos," a group of poems that Paul L. Montgomery of the New York Times called "among the masterpieces of this century." The poems won him the Bollingen Prize in 1949.

Upon his release from St. Elizabeth's in 1958, Pound returned to Italy, where he lived quietly for the rest of his life.
His Cantos are really long, but here's a short poem of his that I like:

"And the days are not full enough"

And the days are not full enough
And the nights are not full enough
And life slips by like a field mouse
Not shaking the grass

[FBtquXT8]

The cause according to him was Avarice.

or greed.

Or the choice to take more than you give to sustain existance.

Which is traced to the basic choice people have access to in order to supply the demand of existance for as long as possible.

The other being the choice to share as equally as possible.

Either chop down trees faster than they regrow to sustain existance, absolute capitalism, taking more than you give....Avarice

or

Chop down trees as fast as or slower than they regrow to sustain existance, responsible capitalism, sharing equally...Altrusim

Which Ayn Rand said was evil.

Ayn Rand alludes to her belief in Avarice or greed...being equal to that which is Good.

All absolute capitalists operating within the absolute capitalistic hierarchical food powered make work enterprise think like that.

There are of course smart absolute capitalists...and dumb absolute capitalists.

Greed or absolute capitalism is easy to employ as a method of power acquisition.

Altrusim or responsible capitalism is hard as greed is easy....until greed or taking more than you give reaches it's maximum potential...then sharing equally becomes easy and taking more than you give...hard...or impossible.

Of course capitalism is impossible to escape within the Universe...because all and everything capitalize upon Truth to sustain the existance of all and everything.

Whenever you eliminate a lie you travel closer to the source of it's power...

Basically everything that happened to Ezra was because it took him until he was at the end of his lifespan to begin to wake up from the dream he was awake.

Realize the lie he believed was Truth was a lie.

[heilyprollecyspor]

The cause according to him was Avarice.

or greed.

Or the choice to take more than you give to sustain existance.

Which is traced to the basic choice people have access to in order to supply the demand of existance for as long as possible.

The other being the choice to share as equally as possible.

Either chop down trees faster than they regrow to sustain existance, absolute capitalism, taking more than you give....Avarice



Basically everything that happened to Ezra was because it took him until he was at the end of his lifespan to begin to wake up from the dream he was awake.

Realize the lie he believed was Truth was a lie.

Your posts always make think Hypertiger but what the hell is the lie he believed? I'm confused here.

[DoctorBeny]

Brilliant stuff. I wonder if anyone has published his collected works and letters.

I've been reading Mullins' History of the Jews and it is a real eye opener.

Found this archive, the Eustace Mullins one is old, same website.
“Ezra Pound Speaking”

Book is listed, other links, I'll see if I can find it online.

related thread
Eustace Mullins





KILLER ARTICLE , written, radio ?

[1943] ZION by Ezra Pound

#78 (April 20, 1943) U.S.(C35) ZION

If or when one mentions the Protocols alleged to be of the Elders of Zion, one is frequently met with the reply: Oh, but they are a forgery.

Certainly they are a forgery, and that is the one proof we have of their authenticity. The Jews have worked with forged documents for the past 24 hundred years, namely ever since they have had any documents whatsoever. And no one can qualify as a historian of this half century without having examined the Protocols. Alleged, if you like, to have been translated from the Russian, from a manuscript to be consulted in the British Museum, where some such document may or may not exist.

What we know for certain is that they were published two decades ago. That Lord Sydenham wrote a preface to them. That their content has been traced to another sketch said to have appeared in the eighteen forties. The interest in them does not lie in [the] question of their having been, or NOT been concocted by a legislative assembly of Rabbis, democratically elected, or secretly chosen by the Mysterious Order of Seven Branched Antlers or the Bowling Society of Milwaukee. Their interest lies in the type of mind, or the state of mind of their author. That was their interest for the psychologist the day they first appeared. And for the historian two decades later, when the program contained in them has so crushingly gone into effect up to a point, or down to a squalor.

What is interesting, perhaps most, to the historian is their definite campaign against history altogether, their declared intention to blot out the classics, to blot out the record, and to dazzle men with talk of tomorrow. That is a variant on the pie in the bait. As far as reality is concerned, as far as you and I are concerned it makes little difference whether prosperity is in heaven, or in the year 2300, or just round a corner that will never be turned.

A religious man might think his reward might be in heaven, but even a religious man ought to know that his reward will not be on earth in a hundred years time. In fact, the pie in the sky is a more reasonable proposition: an opium with more to it than Mr. Keynes’ day after tomorrow.
I am not concerned with fixing blame retrospectively so much as with judging the present: those who are against the true word, the protocolaires. Now Keynes whose fair is foul, foul is fair sentence can be taken as the quintessence of something or other, is the perfect protoclaire. It comes over me that on the one occasion I had the curious experience of seeing him, he managed to utter two falsehoods in a very short space of time. In fact never opened his mouth without doing so. First in stating that he is an orthodox economist, which he is not, second in saying that the then high cost of living was due to lack of labor, when there were millions of men out of work.

You couldn’t have done much better in two sentences if you were out for a record in the falsification. Protocol No. 8, second [paragraph]:

We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form, etc. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and the main thing, millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures.

Is it possible to arouse any interest in verbal precision? Is it possible to persuade more than six or eight people to consider the scope of crossword puzzles and other devices for looking at words for something that is NOT their meaning? Cabala, for example, anything to make the word mean something it does NOT say. Anything to distract the auditor from the plain sense of the word, or the sentence? Even to communism that is NOT communism. To communism of the episcopal sort, which they want in England. A Bolshevism that is to leave the archibishops and curates just where they are, each with his living or benefice. A revelation against capital, allegedly against capital, that attacks property and leaves capital setting pretty.

Lenin all out for making banking a state affair. And then twenty years during which it has seemed to drop decidedly into the background, when the world revolution was very busy about something else.

It should by now be clear that some people fear NOT the outcome of the war, but the END of the war. Churchill, for example. Not defeat, not the ruin of the Empire that worries him, but the END of the war. End of the slaughter, end of the war conditions.

Robert Clive has been clear enough, ex-British ambassador in Tokyo. Tells you and the world Japan can not be beaten. But the war must go ON, according to Churchill and Roosevelt. Churchill sees the end of monopoly and privilege, or at least a shift when the war ends, no matter HOW.

That is the point you should consider. In regard to the protocols, either there is and was a plot to ruin all goyim, all nations of Europe, or some people are stark raving crazy. They want war to go on to certain wreck. WHO are they? Mere cannon fodder. The American troops in N. Africa know they are not there thru any wish of their own. The war was started for gold, to maintain the fetish value of gold. Plenty of other sidelines. Minor advantages have been COMMERCIALLY taken.

Did the present regime in England WANT the troops to return after Dunkirk? Every move for reform in England is a fascist reform, or proposition along fascist lines.

The supreme betrayal of Europe is inherent in the alliance of Anglo-Jewry with Moscow. Debts rise. That is one part of the war. It is a contest between STOPPING the war and going on with it. And only one side does any fighting. Namely the party that STARTED the war. They are for its continuance. Who are they?

BUT they are also for starting the next one. They openly proclaim that AFTER (that is IF) America finishes with Japan, she will have to fight Russia. IF Russia should break into Europe.

Only blindness and deafness can keep you unaware of these proclamations. The U.S. must protect the world? Why? Does the world want it? The U.S., once this war is over, must be strong enough to beat Russia.

The U.S. had a chance to maintain her prestige and unique position by staying NEUTRAL. Neutral while other powers exhausted themselves. And she DID not.

Who are the lunatics? Was there a deliberate plot? That is what should concern you. WAS there a plot? How long had it been in existence? Does it continue, with its Lehmans, Morgenthaus, Baruchs? Proposals to send the darkies to Africa, to work for Judea, and the rest of it? And WILL you, after Japan is thru with you, take on Russia? In order to maintain the banking monopoly? With Mr. Wille Wiseman, late of the British secret service, ensconced in Kuhn, Loeb and Co., to direct you and rule you?

[illignocearia]

Eustace Mullins was a student of Ezra Pound, and he was also a friend of Dr. Revilor Oliver. I didn't know that.

An Afternoon With Eustace Mullins
Exclusive To Rense.com
By James Dyer c. 2003 All Rights Reserved
May not be reproduced in any media
7-15-3

This author's world, like yours, changed forever on that September morning in 2001. I knew immediately that we were being lied to, but like all members of my generation, I had very little real information upon which to draw. The vapid explanations of the government, relayed through an owned media, were the incantations of a defrocked priesthood in my eyes and those of my peers.

So we all went looking for our own sources and making our own outlets. The site upon which you read this is just one of thousands. In my search for the reasons why two skyscrapers came down on a Tuesday morning, why we witnessed the suspension of the Fourth and Sixth Amendments via the Patriot Act and a why a seemingly Zionist- heavy foreign policy had America tied-up like a junkyard dog, I stumbled upon Eustace Mullins in my own backyard while researching the Federal Reserve.

Eustace Mullins is the last living protege of Ezra Pound, the author of the only book burned in Germany since Hitler (a burning under the direction of Americans) and a former researcher for Joseph McCarthy. He's known almost everyone on the American Right for the last 50 years, and is one of the most hated men in America in some circles. He belongs to no group, espouses no movement or party and doesn't give a damn what you think of him. I found an affable 80 year- old man with a healthy sense of humor and a keen love for Liberty. Here's a piece of my conversation with him on his front porch on July 8th, 2003.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's start with your first book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve

I started the research in 1948, the year I met Ezra Pound. I worked for three years on that book and I went through 2000 books at the Library of Congress to get the material for it.

And you worked with George Stimson on Secrets of the Federal Reserve?

Yes. George was quite a scholar. He was founder of the National Press Club, which did one terrible thing to this country. It created the myth that journalists are serious people. They'd always been known as drunks and fools up to that point, which is what they were. George, because he wasn't a fool or a drunk, created the National Press Club as a place where serious journalists could be taken seriously. But there aren't any. So the NPC became a big office building where a lot of lobbyists and journalists have their offices.

Ezra Pound commissioned me to write Secrets of the Federal Reserve for $10 a week. When I finished the book, no one would touch it. Devin Garrity said they couldn't print it, and they'd be the only ones that could. We finally found a girl who printed a thousand copies and we sold it immediately. We sold it within a month, they took every book.

The German edition came out in '55 and it was burned by the German government.

Was there a rationale?

Well, it went before a court hearing and judge named Israel Katz, an Occupation judge, ruled that the book was unconstitutional under German law. It broke laws against race and that was the legal excuse for them to ban the book. [author's note: Secrets of the Federal Reserve makes no mention of any race]

What was your immediate reaction to the book being burned?

I was devastated because I expected to make money over there and of course Guido Roeder had put up his own money to print the book. I tried to sue the German govt. and the German govt. said they were still under the American occupation, so I sued the American govt. and they said that Germany had gotten its "freedom" back in 1953...some kind of treaty. It was a total runaround.

Other books of yours...?

The next book was The World Order. I reprinted Secrets of the Federal Reserve in '83, and it began to sell pretty well, being an updated book, so I printed The World Order which was sort of a spin-off of the research I had left over from revising Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Then I printed The Curse of Canaan, a study of demonology through history and I'm reprinting that this fall. I've never advertised any of these books, it's all been word of mouth. I've never spent one penny on advertising, and the average NY publisher spends 30% of his budget on advertising.

How many copies of your books do you think are floating around out there?

Over a million. I print 10,000 copies a run and I sell out and reprint them over and over again.

I found an entire copy of Secrets of the Federal Reserve on the internet. Do you mind that your books may be on the net?

There's nothing I can do about it. I'd like to have the money, but it's more important that the information gets out there. That's the key to the whole thing. If people know what's going on, then there's a chance that something could be done about it.

Maybe this will help sell some books...

Oh, it might. But I never count on anything. (chuckles)

When did you first become aware of the ADL?

When Secrets of the Federal Reserve was printed finally, I had a little discussion group at the Library of Congress (I was working there at the time), it was very polyglot, blacks, students, a Jew...the Jewish boy said to me "This book is anti-semitic." I said "What're you talking about? There's no mention of Jews." He said "Oh no, the Anti-Defamation League..." (this was one of the first times I'd heard of the ADL) "...has publicly stated that it's an anti- semitic book." They've stuck to that since 1953 without ever citing one sentence that's anti-semitic in it.

In the research you did for "Secrets of the Federal Reserve", have you had to revise much in your reprints?

Nothing I've written has ever been challenged by anyone. I've given many lectures around the world and no one has ever stood up and said "Mr. Mullins, you're mistaken here...". I was trained by Ezra Pound, the greatest mind of his day, and no one's ever said he was mistaken, either.

What kind of man was Ezra Pound?

He was a very genial person, he never quarreled with anyone, never attacked anyone but people were afraid of him. I used to invite Jews to come meet him at St. Elizabeth's, but more often than not they wouldn't show up.

He was most likely painted as a monster in their minds...

Oh yes. People invent their own monsters. Joe McCarthy, for example. Joe is still potrayed in the press daily as a monster that goaded people to their deaths, and they've never produced one person that he made a false accusation against.

I understand Ann Coulter just came out with a new book where she reviews Joe's record and she shows there were no victims, they were dedicated Communists.

What'd you do for Joe McCarthy?

I researched and wrote material for him. Actually, I destroyed Joe McCarthy because I introduced him to the real origins of Communism, which was the international bankers. He knew nothing about that. He thought Communists were little Jewish tailors on the Lower East Side of New York.

I showed him the connections between international bankers like the Rothschilds and Communism. You can't have a worldwide movement without a lot of money behind it. It's like when the circus comes to town. You have to pay someone to hang the posters.

On the John Birch Society...

JBS was setup by Nelson Rockefeller. I knew two people at the original meeting. They needed a right-wing, anti-communist organization. NR decided that Robert Welch was the man to run JBS, so he arranged for the sale of Welch's Candy Co. (where Robert Welch had been working for his brother John) to Nabisco (which was a Rockefeller controlled company) at a highly inflated price and Welch was given an income to run the John Birch Society.

Revilo Oliver was a good friend of mine and he was one of the founders of the JBS. He and I were sitting in his living room once and he told me that he knew Nelson Rockefeller ran the Birch Society because he had a revolving fund at Chase Manhattan Bank, and whenever Welch needed a quarter million dollars to meet the payroll, he'd go to CMB and withdraw the money.

Oliver told you that?

Himself. One of the founders, can't ask for better authority than that.

I traveled around for years and I was trusted because it was pretty well established that I was working for no one but myself, so people would be frank with me. I'm writing my autobiography now, which will break all these things out. It'll be out this spring. I'll go into JBS, McCarthy, Ezra Pound and e.e. cummings...

e.e. cummings was a wonderful person with a good sense of humor, but we never had many light-hearted conversations. Everybody in the country wanted to be e.e. cummings...

One day in 1952, Ezra said to me "I want you to go to New York and meet e.e. cummings". I was kind of surprised that he wanted me to, so I hitchhiked up there...I had no money in those days, so I hitched everywhere...so I hitchhiked up to New York. I got to his place at about twilight and knocked on his door. I heard only silence. I knocked again and heard a voice saying "Who is it?" I said "Eustace Mullins". The voice said "Who? Who sent you?" I said "Eustace Mullins...Ezra Pound sent me". The door flew open, as Ezra was the open sesame.

e.e cummings managed to escape the smears...

He escaped the anti-semite smear, but not the anti-communist smear...

Speaking of Communists, what's your take on their descendants, the Neocons?

The Neocons are worse than the Communists because they're bent on world power more than the Communists ever were. The Neocons are more dangerous because they've taken Communism and hitched to the Jewish bandwagon. They see it as the final vehicle to world domination.

What about Jews? Are you an anti-semite?

I've always tried to defend that. When I went to New York in 1952, I met a lot of very Conservative Jews, Henry Klein, Benjamin Freedman and others, and they were real Jews by faith and race. The real Jews were Orthodox Jews, and they've believed for 2000 years that there can be no Jewish kingdom on earth until the coming of the Messiah. Of course, they refuse to admit that Jesus was the Messiah, so no Jewish kingdom...

In 1810, the Rothschilds began to push for a country for the Jews, so they created a new brand of Judaism called Reform Judaism which would establish a new Jewish country, which is now Israel. Only the Rothschilds could do that because to create a worldwide movement costs a lot of money.

Theodor Herzl's The Jewish State was originally called Address to the Rothschilds

They financed Karl Marx and the League of Just Men, too. They financed Judaism, Communism and Nazism. Their goal has been constant, and you can't succeed unless you have goals. (chuckles)

What do you think of the current political landscape?

Amazingly, the Democrats have come up with nine candidates who're all dumber than Bush. I though it would have been impossible to find nine people in the whole United States dumber than Bush.

You know Howard Dean's campaign chair is Stephen Grossman, ex- president of AIPAC...

OH MY GOD! He is? Well, Jewish money is buying this campaign...

Dean's another blank slate. He's never done anything, and they're raving about him. When you see someone become the darling of the media, watch out for someone like that. You know they're compromised...compromised forever, you can't expect anything from them.

What's your opinion of Dubya and the Bush family?

I wrote about the Bush family in my book The World Order which came out in 1985. They'd been lackeys of the Harriman family at Union Pacific, and the Harrimans were lackeys of the Rothschilds who put up the money for Union Pacific. George Herbert Walker, who was the first President Bush's grandfather, was appointed head of Brown Brothers Harriman which handled all the Harriman investments. He did a very good job and the Bushes have been working for them ever since. They were all members of Skull and Bones at Yale.

We'd all been aware of how dumb George Bush Sr. was. Reagan, who was a well-known actor with charisma and was a good public speaker...in his steps came Bush who couldn't utter a line and was a complete blank slate, he was a lousy president because he was such a bumbling, inarticulate person that he was a great disappointment to everybody. Bear in mind, we were still coasting on the Reagan years so he got through his presidency without too much trouble.

Anyway, we have George W. Bush, his son, who's even more of a wimp than his father. But they were all Skull and Bones so everything they do is overlooked.

If you could sum up the current president in one sentence...

Lightweight is all that you can say. That covers everything.

What's gonna happen to Bush?

He's no FDR, they can't elect him four times. He'll be forgotten quickly. His father'd be forgotten except that his son is president.

Speaking of Skull and Bones, did you know Anthony Sutton at all?

I knew him well. I traveled with him for years.

His scholarship was very good. He was at the Hoover Institution, which was a Rothschild setup. It was setup after WWI to rewrite history. The Rothschilds sent hundreds of people through Europe after the war, through all the war-torn countries, to gather up as many records as they could so they could control their version of history.

Was that Sutton's take, too?

Well, I always considered Tony to be British Intelligence. He died last year, but I hadn't seen him in several years because he was on the lam for eight years. He'd embezzled money from several people, promising to write books and never wrote them. What had happened was that he'd married a young Japanese girl and she had very expensive tastes, so he ran up a lot of debts.

That's how they always screw you up...

I guess he was very happy with her, she was probably very pretty. I've spent a lot of time in Japan in the past 15 years, and the Japanese probably make the best wives. Very intelligent and they're not depressing.

I think that's why there's so much homosexuality in the US, because the women are so impossible. They're mean, greedy, vindictive, so whatever feminine qualities they have are almost totally submerged.

Let's touch on the Council on Foreign Relations...

The CFR was a phoney institution, they've never had any power at all. They take their orders from the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, the Rothschilds. This bugaboo about the CFR has always made me laugh. Back in the 50's everybody thought the United States was ruled by this corrupt, sinister organization. In fact the CFR was a bunch of fatcats that got together in New York City, had dinner in luxurious hotels...they were all wealthy people, CEOS of banks and insurance companies and so forth...

So their place in the scheme of things is...?

They're strictly a diversion. They had no power, and their policies were always written by the RIIA in London at Chatham House. I can't find an instance where the CFR has inaugurated a policy of any kind. Even today, people read books from the 50's about the sinister CFR and how sinister they are, like a KGB ruling the US...I always thought it a joke.

How deep into American society is Israeli intelligence?

It's universal. All the newspapers. Most of Mossad is volunteer anyway. They don't have to go looking for it. All sensitive, confidential information is coming in from every government office every day. They've got better intelligence than George Bush has.

In both senses of the word...

Everything Bush gets is filtered, but Mossad gets the straight dope.

Where do you see it going from here? More of the same?

More of the same, to a point. The dam's starting to break.

It's begun, then?

It's well under way. Within ten years, we'll see a complete revolution in world thinking.

Do you ascribe part of that to the internet?

The internet is a sign that the damn is weakening. It's unstoppable, like a natural force. They can wish it'll go away, but it won't.

Things come along when they're needed enough.

You've been slogging away in relative obscurity for these 60 years...

You expect that. You stay in obscurity if you're not marketing a profitable line of goods...

If you're not a whore...

(laughs) If you're not a whore. I've never tried to sell propaganda, and so I haven't made much money, though I got along well enough without it.

Life is survival anyway, under the best of circumstances.

What are you proudest of in your life?

Getting Ezra Pound out of St. Elizabeth's, and now trying to rehabilitate Joe McCarthy. These are two of the most maligned persons of the 20th century. If I can change public thinking of these two men that I admired and loved, maybe they'll get their just desserts.

Let's talk about the Ruling Class: Jewish, Gentile, Gentile- Jewish...?

It's more Gentile than Jewish, but the policies are ultimately Zionist-Jewish, through the Rothschild family.

They don't give a damn about Jew or Christian, however. They'll organize a massacre of Jews or Christians if it serves their purposes. Most of the pogroms in Europe were organized by Jews as a matter of policy.

They do the same thing in this country. Attacks on govt. buildings, OKC bombing, Waco, etc. are threats of terror in order to control people.

You've been studying these things for 60 years, and some members of my generation are just waking up to what you know. This thing has a million names, The New World Order, the Octopus...

You can call it anything, and it's still the same thing. It's five thousand years old. You're not talking about something new when you speak of the CFR. They'll use the CFR for a while and then abandon it and setup something else. The Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, what have you...

You say this goes back five thousand years...

It's a generational war. We're locked in the policies of the past...the Babylonian money system, the Babylonian religious system...

The interesting thing is, the more I studied this, the more simplified everything became. Patriots are always criticised for being very simplistic, but the fact is that once you get to a certain level of knowledge, everything is simple.

What do you want to do before you die?

More work. I want to reprint these books and publish my autobiography.

Is there any part of history that you've been bitten or re- bitten by lately?

Not at all, because what I see instead is a glorious future. I've said to people for years that America is at the dawn of its Republic now, because we never had a Republic. We've been under control of the bankers the whole time. We'll get our own government and America will begin to have a history. We have no history. All we have is a history of Zionist intrigue. ~

Dyer is a writer and researcher living in Virginia.

Disclaimer

[illignocearia]

Here's some Revilo Oliver

[lapyignipinge]

im going to keep bumping this until people get the significance of his writing.

[gomosopions]

This book is written by an influential Jew who writes about poetry. He has taught at both Yale and Harvard ...

http://www.amazon.com/The-Best-Poems...3560507&sr=8-1

HE HATES POUND. And in place of any of Pound's poetry, is a screed about anti-Semitism and other attacks on Pound. There are 108 poets represented in the book above, along with his Pro-Talmudist reflections, attempting to inject Judaism into Western civilization's history.

[Lauramalina]

back up

[Lorionasodi]

Lately there has been a lot of belongings of Eustace Mullins floating around on Ebay. Some rather juicy stuff also that should be preserved. Who knows where all this ends up, it might even get destroyed.

Juicy one here..

http://www.ebay.com/itm/EZRA-POUND-P...-/370589266775

"WARNING: GRAPHIC HOMOSEXUAL CONTENT!!

30 page manuscript / bio

This is an original copy of a personal autobiography by Ezra Pound for Eustace Mullins about his early life as a child. If you have ever wondered if Ezra Pound was "gay" this is your answer. I CANNOT show all of it's content, but I have enough here, you get the picture. This was done as a way for other to understand his "fasination" as well as clear his concience as he states in the first paragraph."

[DurryVony]

Anyone know of a good online article or site giving a positive overview of McCarthy? I recall being indoctrinated in public college US history about the evils of the "McCarthy Era". But now, awake to "the conspiracy", it seems clear that McCarthy was systematically vilified for exposing what is in reality, a vast communist (NWO) conspiracy only they don't call it that of course. So I'm convinced McCarthy was vilified in the same way HitlerCo were, for making too much anti-bankster-conspiracy waves... with the conspirators using their usual MO of inverting reality in projecting their own evil onto their opponents & resistors.

[FBtquXT8]

The lie all believe is Truth until they find Truth and then realize they believed a lie was Truth.

[heilyprollecyspor]

The lie all believe is Truth until they find Truth and then realize they believed a lie was Truth.

Thanks! I got it.