[Mboxmaja]

Check out this recently discovered video of WTC 7. Fast forward to 1:16 - it shows the demolition charges exploding (at 1:45 to be exact) and the building crumpling just before the free fall collapse. This is direct visual proof of controlled demolition. Please circulate this widely. Who is going to deny his own two eyes?






Here's the link (thank you Osiris):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=k2Trj_5J02k

[enencephoth]

Link? Please

[Mboxmaja]

Link? Please

Link to what? It's at Youtube.

Are you blonde?

[enencephoth]

Link to what? It's at Youtube.

Are you blonde?

Hilarious! It doesn't show up for me I'll search youtube for it.

[Mboxmaja]

Hilarious! It doesn't show up for me I'll search youtube for it.

So sorry!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=k2Trj_5J02k

[fectsnanteemy]

I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

Controlled demolition is a foregone conclusion, and much of what is seen in that video is evidence of that. The flashes and the noise look as though they may have been added for effect however.

[MeatteCen]

Most of us are sure Israel did 9/11
If they wired one building, they wired them all.
We can only hope one day to see Israel get burned by 10 million degree heat.

[Mboxmaja]

I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

You know BrewTech, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sheesh.

[fectsnanteemy]

You know BrewTech, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sheesh.

I edited my comment in an attempt to better explain myself.

[Mboxmaja]

I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

Controlled demolition is a foregone conclusion, and much of what is seen in that video is evidence of that. The flashes and the noise look as though they may have been added for effect however.

OK, I'll bite: what is your point?

[Marat]

Only a new investigation without any jew involvement will bring out the truth.

[fectsnanteemy]

OK, I'll bite: what is your point?

I thought I had made it... I must not be as good a writer as I thought.

Look, I can see with my own eyes and rational mind that WTC7 was a controlled demolition... LSstein said as much on camera. To me, that is the smoking gun. It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain who watches that video that WTC7 did not collapse due to fire.

My doubts about the authenticity of the video you posted only address the flashes and noise that would normally accompany a controlled demolition... it occurred to me that it would be easy enough to add those later (especially after nearly 11 years) for a more dramatic effect.

OTOH, those sights and sounds are exactly what one would expect to see and hear... it may be that the MSM manipulated their footage to reduce the visual and auditory evidence of CD for mass consumption, and to support the official story.

I guess my point is, with the multitude of ways that information of all types can be effectively manipulated, it's difficult to know real from fake, and it helps to stay skeptical.

[Rffkwfct]

That video is as fake as Traficants hair.

[Mboxmaja]

Only a new investigation without any jew involvement will bring out the truth.

Fat chance of that.

[Gakeincidoniac]

Why does the new video cut away before the collapse?

[MeatteCen]

If you believe the video to be real and later have it proven a fake. Does it discredit you and show you never had a basis for a conspiracy?
I don't need anymore videos to confirm my belief that Israel did 9/11.

[Mboxmaja]

That video is as fake as Traficants hair.

OK, I respect your opinion. Now do me a small favor and watch this video at :44 (turn off the sound so you don't have to listen to the Conspiracy Theory theme music LOL):



In my opinion, this video corroborates the first video I posted.

[Ingeborga]

Conspiracy theory's are just that until they can not be proven as just a conspiracy but they become truth and then it becomes truth and then all you conspiracy fags are right in which I would be right but there is no conspiracy cause I am not a fag so there you go in your world, try to spread the filth that is true while denying the false conspiracies...

[fectsnanteemy]

Weather it is real or not can be debated until the cows come home.

What can NOT be debated is that never in the History of contruction has a fire made a building collapse in on itself at demolition speed and form.

Never is the history of construction has a building collapsed at demolition speed and form as the result of fire from another building being the root cause.


The only way the above can be true is if the laws of Physics and Demolition suspended themselves for one day in the History of Civilization.


The odds of that are pretty dam thin.

[illignocearia]

I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

Controlled demolition is a foregone conclusion, and much of what is seen in that video is evidence of that. The flashes and the noise look as though they may have been added for effect however.

i have seen other video footage that showed the explosions in WTC1 & WTC2. i had also seen the video of WTC7 collapsing. i had heard that it was pre-announced.

and it's great to have it all in one place.


it is true that CGI can be used to simulate the 'squibs' exploding. if someone (Israel) wanted to, they could muddy the waters by making video's with 100's of squibs, like a fireworks display. and it would seem very realistic, if it was done right.

another example of CGI - 99% of the movie Avatar.


here is a map of the WTC site -



note that the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) is across the street from WTC1, with WTC6 in between them.

since the official story is that debris from WTC1 & 2 struck WTC7 & brought it down (although early after 9-11, some asshole called into NYC radio and spent a lot of time telling the world that the (magic) jet fuel went down into the underground tunnels and burned WTC7 that way) one has to wonder - if the debris knocked WTC7 down, why didn't it knock WTC6 down ?


well, WTC7 was the home of a LOT of government offices. it was basically a Fed building. it was where the records into investigations of most of the serious financial crime in NYC were kept.

one other note - on 9-10-11, Rumsfeld held a press conference admitting that the Pentagon had lost/ mis-placed over $1 Trillion.

my guess is, the looting of the US that started before 9-11 WAS being investigated, and that's why Israel & their supporters in NYC decided to bring down WTC7.

however, i think they overplayed their hand. the collapse of WTC7 awoke a LOT of people, including Jim Hoffman -
http://wtc7.net/about.html

unfortunately, Jim Hoffman has sold the website. i pray to God that I HTTrack'ed the original website from back in 2006; it was much more thorough. the original website had a section named
research.wtc7.net
that did a REAL good job investigating the physics of the collapse of WTC1 & WTC2. basically, there was not enough energy in the airplanes' jet fuel to raise the temperature of the building steel to the boiling point of water, much less to get it to 1300 F (half the melting temp, at which temp steel still has a lot of structural strength.)