[JohnfAclambrJA]

Explanation: The Mare Orientale is one of the most striking large scale lunar features. Located on the Moon's extreme western edge, this impact basin is unfortunately difficult to see from an earthbound perspective. It is over 3 billion years old, about 600 miles across and was formed by the impact of an asteroid sized object. The collision caused ripples in the lunar crust resulting in the three concentric circular features visible in this 1967 photograph made by NASA's Lunar Orbiter 4. Molten lava from the Moon's interior flooded the impact site through the fractured crust creating a mare. Dark, smooth regions on the moon are called mare (Latin for sea), because early astronomers thought these areas might be oceans.
Thread for discussion of the far side of the moon. Since the moon is in geosynchronous orbit with Earth, we never see the far side of the moon, only ever the close side. The moon is spinning and moving at the exact right speed to always show one side.

Thoughts on the far side of the moon?

Not much has been written on it, I am finding?

[JohnfAclambrJA]

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap021123.html

[Chooriwrocaey]

Based on that picture perhaps we should rename it to the backside of the moon?

[JohnfAclambrJA]

Seriously. It is eerie. That was not even part of my perception of the moon at all until tonight.

[Stacypettlerr]

Maybe that's where they hide all them high speed crafts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eqD-ANP9PY

[ATTILAGLIC]

I think I can see a nipple !

The dark side of the moon has freeze dried giant lizards!

65 million years ago... The earth was spinning manically around it's axis in 10 hours, instead of today's 24... The centripetal forces around the equator were equal to the gravity of earths mass, thus a virtually weightless existence around the equator, allowing lizards to grow to a hundred tons, or fly, or insects witha wingspan of 4-5 feet, or ferns growing to 100-200 feet height...

Earth was spinning faster and faster, until suddenly a segment large as today's moon was broken off. The denser masses from the core of the earth ended up always facing the sun, while the lighter crust samples ended up on the darkside of the moon, that's where you can expect to find freeze-dried dinosaurs remains...

Strange that there have been no missions to the farside of the moon, aye?

[ATTILAGLIC]

Strange thing is though, the kinetic energy of today's earth moon system is perfectly equal to a planet earths size with moons mass added to it spinning at 10 hours around it's axis.

As wild as the theory seems at first thought, the more it holds up to scrutiny. The real reason why we don't see the giant creatures and plants that were on earth 65 million years ago, is that it is impossible for them to survive under earths current gravity.

[uniopaypamp]

The moon appears as earth's giant eyeball staring out into space?

[Zesavenue]

All the facts about the moon indicate it's an artificial satellite.

[mikajuise]

I'm sorry, I don't normally correct spelling, but it's "centrifugal"

[Stacypettlerr]

Strange thing is though, the kinetic energy of today's earth moon system is perfectly equal to a planet earths size with moons mass added to it spinning at 10 hours around it's axis.

As wild as the theory seems at first thought, the more it holds up to scrutiny. The real reason why we don't see the giant creatures and plants that were on earth 65 million years ago, is that it is impossible for them to survive under earths current gravity.

Earths current gravity could be because it is larger than it was millions of years ago.. this video kidof explains, and the animated mapping seems to confirm, but what do I know. What say ye?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

[johobuo]

The moon is spinning and moving at the exact right speed to always show one side. Do we know for a fact that the moon is spinning on its axis? We'd see the same thing if it wasn't spinning. Wouldn't we?


Explanation: The Mare Orientale is one of the most striking large scale lunar features. Located on the Moon's extreme western edge, this impact basin is unfortunately difficult to see from an earthbound perspective. It is over 3 billion years old, about 600 miles across and was formed by the impact of an asteroid sized object. This states as fact that the moon was struck by an object. I have often wondered about the craters on the moon. The idea that they were created by impact of objects striking the moon has always been difficult for me to digest. Then I read about David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill who wrote Thunderbolts of the Gods. They claim that the moon's craters are caused by huge electrical discharges hitting the surface--like lightning bolts. This is more plausible than collisions with space objects.

There is a good synopsis of the electric universe theory here:

http://www.thunderbolts.info/synopsis2.htm

Hatha

[exchpaypalgold]

The moon is spinning and moving at the exact right speed to always show one side.

Do we know for a fact that the moon is spinning on its axis? We'd see the same thing if it wasn't spinning. Wouldn't we?


Explanation: The Mare Orientale is one of the most striking large scale lunar features. Located on the Moon's extreme western edge, this impact basin is unfortunately difficult to see from an earthbound perspective. It is over 3 billion years old, about 600 miles across and was formed by the impact of an asteroid sized object.
This states as fact that the moon was struck by an object. I have often wondered about the craters on the moon. The idea that they were created by impact of objects striking the moon has always been difficult for me to digest. Then I read about David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill who wrote Thunderbolts of the Gods. They claim that the moon's craters are caused by huge electrical discharges hitting the surface--like lightning bolts. This is more plausible than collisions with space objects.

There is a good synopsis of the electric universe theory here:

http://www.thunderbolts.info/synopsis2.htm

Hatha Have watched the vids and read probably the same you have. I lean more to this!

The moon has no geological activity, It has no atmosphere, So unlike earth which is unlike the moon in
that it is still dynamic , weathering and the more plausible plate tectonics, , if given time
any scar from something hitting it, will be erased, the moon on the other hand, can not, so the scars remain
forever or at least until something else happens.

[mikajuise]

I wish the picture was higher resolution and larger.

But thanks for posting it.

Can you guys see the lizard people in there, looking out?

[career-builder]

All the facts about the moon indicate it's an artificial satellite.

"Looking at all the anomalies and unanswered questions regarding the Moon, the best explanation for the Moon is observational error; it doesn't exist"

-Irwin I.Shapiro, Harvard Astrophysicist

[exchpaypalgold]

Originally Posted by midnight rambler All the facts about the moon indicate it's an artificial satellite.

"Looking at all the anomalies and unanswered questions regarding the Moon, the best explanation for the Moon is observational error; it doesn't exist"

-Irwin I.Shapiro, Harvard Astrophysicist
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:





Dam you Stop!



:lol

[ElectraDupu]

speaking of the moon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DPF0...layer_embedded

[johobuo]

I watched the Neal Adams Conspiracy of Science video. To me, it is another example of how science and our consciousness are changing.

I'm always interested in new ways of looking at things. A lot of explanations of what we see don't really explain anything but reinforce what we already believe. Anybody who comes up with a new way of looking at things has to overcome the inertia of conservatism. Conservatism is really a resistance to new ideas, based on a fear of having to use your brain to learn something new.

I get excited when I see people challenging established theories with better ones. I wasn't aware of the growing earth theory until now. I've been relearning everything I knew. I don't believe too much of what I was taught. Much of it was outright lies. I do believe what I have learned for myself. And what makes sense.


Hatha

[DoniandaCoado]

I wonder whether female astronauts have periods when in space

how exactly females synchronize to the moon?

[SasV7ReJ]

I have often wondered whether female astronauts have periods when in space

:ROFL: :ROFL:

Guarantee you if more than one together, they will get into sync with each other
quick. At my last major job, had maybe 140-160 woman working together, and
I guarantee you, when one went on the rag , soon all were. and if male, duck and
cover! And strangely I have seen a correlation with the full moon!