[selayeffethy]

LuckyStrike, I respect you very much and take your opinions seriously.

What was Hilter then? Sum it up in a "Hitler for Dummies" post if you could please.

I think Hitler was the greatest political leader of the last century. People can go on ad infinitum pontificating about what may or may not have gone on behind the scenes of the Third Reich, whether or not they had UFO technology, were into the occult, were rothschild agents, or how many craps Hitler took per day. I deal with what I can observe for myself and read first hand. As in Hitlers speeches and Mein Kampf.

I think many people falsely lump Hitler into the same camp as Stalin. "hell they were both mass murderers and socialists" but this is quite false. I don't think the majority here buy into the holocaust business nor should anyone buy into the socialism business. As I have said in previous posts on the topic, we know socialism doesn't work, that central planning doesn't work. Yet here is someone who took a country who had just been defeated in war and had their economy destroyed by the worst hyper inflation in recent history and became an economic powerhouse that could've taken on any other single country, and damn near took on the top 3. I am going off memory here because wikipedia is down for SOPA, but the top tax rates in the US in the early 1940's was 85%, Britain 25% and Germany 12% now you tell me which one sounds the most totalitarian.

So I can observe with my eyes that he took down the central bank and ended marxism, I can observe that his economy took off, I can observe that jews have made sure his very name is synonymous with evil.

Generally I can leave others to speculate about all the other myths circulated by jews (they are super prevalent on the "History Channel" headed by jew abby ravensky) however as I stated in a post or two above I do not like to see people give the beast system so much credit. Sure they "never let a good crisis go to waste" but that doesn't mean everyone who tries to oppose them is simply controlled.

Just my .02 (with inflation that ain't much)

[traiffhetl]

The main problem I have with your view on Nazi Germany is not that you disagree with me, but rather what I perceive as a defeatist mentality.

The reality of the situation is that ANY leader that stands against them is suspect. There is no way around that. If we trust our gut that the next leader is the real thing, we will most likely end up just like the Germans did during and after WW2. It's the nature of the beast.
It's not self-defeating. Understanding the tactics of the enemy makes us stronger, not weaker. Once we understand not to back leaders with our lives, the next obvious step is to devise other strategies, like leaderless resistance.
We will never know if any would-be leaders are the real thing or not. Any competent would-be leader knows this as well, and if there is one he will lead "anti-semites" to battle is such a way that none would have to trust their lives against his word.
Then as now, 90% of the battle is information. Those who want to control information will try to elevate such battles to violence instead. Hitler did not mount an effective information battle. he only said things that were true and those who agreed got killed. His message was not designed to convince the world, only to conscipt soldiers to war.

[selayeffethy]

The reality of the situation is that ANY leader that stands against them is suspect. There is no way around that. If we trust our gut that the next leader is the real thing, we will most likely end up just like the Germans did during and after WW2. It's the nature of the beast.
It's not self-defeating. Understanding the tactics of the enemy makes us stronger, not weaker. Once we understand not to back leaders with our lives, the next obvious step is to devise other strategies, like leaderless resistance.
We will never know if any would-be leaders are the real thing or not. Any competent would-be leader knows this as well, and if there is one he will lead "anti-semites" to battle is such a way that none would have to trust their lives against his word.
Then as now, 90% of the battle is information. Those who want to control information will try to elevate such battles to violence instead. Hitler did not mount an effective information battle. he only said things that were true and those who agreed got killed. His message was not designed to convince the world, only to conscipt soldiers to war.

On this subject we disagree, simple as that, just an example of the 1 thing we disagree on out of 100. But don't think because I disagree with the overall premise that I disagree with the majority of your points. Like they say "if you shoot all your allies you end up fighting alone" I'm sure you see it the same.

The battle is information, no doubt about it.

[Colorostikse]

Mullins in 2000:

THE NAZI ZIONIST PARTY AND THE HOLOCAUST

Uploaded by joggler66 on Jan 1, 2012
Eustace Mullins explains connection between the
NAtional socialists and ZIonists. The result is a NAZI Party
which rules the world today....
Eustace Mullins in Salmon Arm BC, Canada, August 2000. go here: #103 - question about Mullins' take of the official holohoax narrative.

[realfan87]

i find it most telling that shikelgruber himself, (please stop calling him hiler) doesnt have a SINGLE aryan trait. none.

[usacomm]

'The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so--called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.'

-- from The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations by Myron Fagan"


'The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'

-- J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI"


'The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one--world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.'

-- Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets."

[AdSuiteAdobe]

I agree, but this flies in the face of the suggestions of one of the holy books of this site..."Synagogue Of Satan"...

Edit: sorry, tried to quote here..I meant the notion that Hitler was potentially a Rothschild agent/blood as mentioned in that book.