General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
My 93 Suburban had the 4l60-e transmission go out on it. Instead of having a crappy transmission rebuilt or replaced with another crappy automatic, I'm thinking of buying a wrecked pickup with a 5 speed manual and doing a transplant.
The wreck has a 4.3 instead of the 5.7, which should fit the bell housing pattern and accept the flywheel since it is the same engine minus two cylinders. Can anyone confirm or deny this? The firewall has the knockouts for the clutch master cylinder. It looks like the Suburban has a place to mount the clutch pedal bracket. If not, I can make something work. Cutting a hole in the floor won't be a problem. My biggest question is: Will the computer be OK with the fact that it is no longer plugged into an automatic transmission? If so, how do I remedy that? Also, will the cruise work the same with a standard as it does with the auto? I think it should since it's getting the signal from the tailshaft. Is there anything else I am overlooking? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Ximmy, the Suburban was never offered in a stick shift, which is what I really want. This breakdown is kind of an opportunity to make a vehicle that GM never had enough sense to make. (If it will actually work.)
LS, I've considered one of those, and I know they are tougher, but still I've never owned an auto that WASN'T the first major component to fail, and I've never owned a standard that WAS. And to clarify, the Suburban is a 350. The donor truck would be the 4.3. I may end up putting an auto back in, but I wanted to explore the option of a standard. GoD, That's what I'm hoping for too. I need to find out for sure before I start this though. Palani, I kind of expect that too. That would be pretty simple/cheap in the scheme of things. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
LS, I've considered one of those, and I know they are tougher, but still I've never owned an auto that WASN'T the first major component to fail, and I've never owned a standard that WAS. And to clarify, the Suburban is a 350. The donor truck would be the 4.3. I may end up putting an auto back in, but I wanted to explore the option of a standard. I've driven a stick sub, but it was earlier than a 93. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
The trans will bolt right up, the length should be the same too. Your issue is going to be the computer signals. If you retrofit the computer from a stick shift similar vehicle you should be good to go. Leaving the current computer is just going to be a nightmare to fix. Is there a separate computer just for the transmission? That's probably the angle to look at.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Sounds like an accident waiting to happen. Save your money and get a built transmission http://www.bowtieoverdrives.com/cata...php?ITEMID=659
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
I've never owned an auto that WASN'T the first major component to fail, and I've never owned a standard that WAS. My 90 1/2 ton Suburban had a 700R4 auto and it was still working like new at 165K miles when I sold it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
umm... how about repairing the truck, selling it, and getting what you really want? another option would be to buy something like a 93 silverado or similar with stick shift, then put your suburban body on the silverado frame. if you bought one that has the options your sub is already set up for, it would be pretty much plug and play at that point. i would think most of the wiring harnesses for same year models would be interchangable. check your local wreckers...might find a sweet deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Unfortunately the mechanical superiority of Manual trannies has not been true in the last 20 years because the automakers have figured out ways to make them fail, like case-supported needle bearings for the cluster gear. The only advantage of a manual tranny is that they usually warn you before they fail completely. I've had a few 4T60-Es in Bonnevilles, and they were typical 150,000 and then the planet carrier breaks. Not too impressive. At this point, I'm leaning toward Skid's suggestion. My main problem with autos is reliability. I really like the rest of the Suburban, I was just gunshy about putting an auto back in it. If I can get a souped up tranny like that for the same price as a regular rebuild, that soulnds like the way to go. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Hmmm... doubt you can get a beefed one for the same price as a rebuild. During my racing career i had to rely on trans builders and that truly sucked. Last straw was Jim Howe from Howe Racing, he was to build me a good one but just turned into a big asshole and stole my 4 grand. Eventually I broke down and bought some books and built one myself. In retrospect that was what I should have done in the beginning, I just thought they were big old gray mystery boxes.
There has to be some sites that cover a manual to auto swap in a similar vehicle, there are sites for everything. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
I've only rebuilt 2 automatic transmissions in my life, the last one was in 1984. As I remember, the parts were about $35. It's much cheaper to rebuild an automatic than a manual if you're doing it yourself.
Ditto on the gearing comments, it's very annoying to have a manual tranny that's doing 10 MPH in first and 15 MPH in reverse at 1000 RPM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
They make 4l60's that take 1000 horsepower and live.
http://www.jegs.com/p/ATI/ATI-700R4-...37722/10002/-1 It is a very popular dragracing trans good oil and a real cooler not the shitty stock one.Buy an upgraded one which is not much more than a rebuilt/new stocker and enjoy. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|