General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Interesting that people think nothing of dropping a fortune on a watch, when a cheapo Casio can do the same... but as soon as someone drops cash on a decent computer (er... say like a Mac) they're a posy pr1ck. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Interesting that people think nothing of dropping a fortune on a watch, when a cheapo Casio can do the same... but as soon as someone drops cash on a decent computer (er... say like a Mac) they're a posy pr1ck. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
They look really nice. I'll try and find a UK stockist for a proper look. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
It's because while everyone has different priorities, not everyone is intelligent and insightful enough to realise this. I initially see the issue with getting on someones case for spending 5 grand on a top of the line computer, or spending 5 grand on a watch. Thing is, that computer will be obsolete in 2 years, while you'll still have decades of value to be gaine from that watch. Just my 2 c. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Well, here's the thing about a watch. A quality semi luxury or full on luxury brand watch will last decades, if not longer. It will always be in style, and you can pass it down to your son and he can wear it, etc. A lot of people just don't realise that because something isn't what they want to spend their disposable income in doesn't mean it is a dumb purchase. To an extent, all purchases made with disposable income are frivolities that nobody really needs. They just make us enjoy our own interests more. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
I wear a Seiko kinetic myself. Keeps amazing time, looks great, and I got it for about $120 from an authorized dealer.
![]() ![]() Check out Lum-Tec. Great watches, great service. I have a few and am very happy with all of them. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
A perfect example of this kind of stupidity is an argument I had with BazerLace the other day where he thought it was stupid of me to spend a lot of money on clothes, while simultaneously trying to claim that spending three grand on a pushbike was actually a necessity. Back on topic, exactly what are you looking for, Gold, SS, Titanium? Plain, three hand dial, chronograph, illuminated display? You say leather band - black or brown? Dial colour and finish? You have to consider these things as you give the impression of being clothing conscious and you want it to compliment your clothing - or at least not clash. As has been said, some may value a good quality watch as it can last for decades, whereas others see them as disposable items, and won't spend more than a tenner on one. Last watch I had (I don't wear one) was a three hand analog, had a SS band and surround of the watch glass, which was a strong crystal - I was doing manual work and needed something resistant to knocks and general wear and tear, water resistant to keep out sweat, water, etc. It wasn't proof against me leaving it somewhere though... |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
For an everyday watch I'd recommend a watch with metal strap! Leather/etc straps absorb moisture and will both deteriorate and start to smell a bit funny when worn daily
![]() Have this one myself: ![]() (I just submerge it in water every now and then to clean the strap) Seikos are very nice for this purpose, they look decent imo are well priced and have outstanding build quality. In your price range it should be easy to find a model with sapphire glass too (which doesn't scratch! Huge plus for an everyday watch imo) Have a look at the Arctura range: http://www.seiko.co.uk/products/seiko/c/arctura Seiko kinetic watches don't need battery replacements either (battery gets charged by wrist movements), which makes them extra reliable [yes] (had my seiko for 7 years, still going strong) Hope the design matches your taste. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
Do you realise the hypocrisy of that? Or with the tent issue? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|