General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I am certain there is much outrage over this, but I just can't muster up a bit of energy to care. It has been running for ~30 years without a nary of worthwhile data. While I certainly think it possible that life exists, seti was never going to be effective imo, as it is the search for a needle in the infinite cosmic haystack. Not to mention, I am with Hawkins... any alien life form there is I probably don't want to meet. It is only 2.5 mil a year, so SETI can certainly find private funding to keep them going if there is any interest among the masses... but after 30 years of nothing, I am no longer interested.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/22632...s_a_break.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
F@H is a waste of time IMO.. I don't think they've produced any useful data up until now, but i could be wrong. I am no biology expert (I'll leave that up to CB after he reads the Wiki on "biology") but, this link lists a whole shitload of stuff that I do not understand but looks important. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Are some of you guys confusing CETI with SETI?
I think CETI shutting down may be a very good idea - why yell out "Hey, here we are, come and get us" ![]() However, I think SETI should continue as if there's an intelligence out there that may be able to visit us, I'd definitely like a "heads up" to prepare the world for them - you certainly don't want the first communication to be a Vogon Construction Fleet, do you? |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
the ATA is `going into hibernation`
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum...d.php?id=63888 BUT it doesnt effect seti@home, they actually use a different array for data and one thats actually more sensitive - in a way the 42 telescope ATA `going to sleep` may be a good thing , as the link says if it was a 350 telescope array it would be `great` but @ 42 it takes longer to scan the sky than the seri@home aracebo |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|