LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-20-2011, 04:32 PM   #1
Paybeskf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default Rant: Reading glasses
I started using reading glasses a year ago mostly for reading small text, but in the last two months i feel i have become more dependent on my glasses.

After a year i have become needy on glasses, and i have become more comfortable with my glasses with out taking them off every five min, i continue to resist glasses and the fact that i need them and my constant dependance bothers me.

Worst part is, at times, perhaps its a habit, i find my self more and more bringing my self closer to written text to see better.

In some ways, i feel my eye sight is going to ****, it bothers me that there is nothing i can do besides a surgery.

And the worst part is, the reason my sight has gone to ****, is because i have spent many hours in front of a monitor.
Paybeskf is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 04:42 PM   #2
mireOpekrhype

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
I started using reading glasses a year ago mostly for reading small text, but in the last two months i feel i have become more dependent on my glasses.

After a year i have become needy on glasses, and i have become more comfortable with my glasses with out taking them off every five min, i continue to resist glasses and the fact that i need them and my constant dependance bothers me.

Worst part is, at times, perhaps its a habit, i find my self more and more bringing my self closer to written text to see better.

In some ways, i feel my eye sight is going to ****, it bothers me that there is nothing i cant do besides a surgery.

And the worst part is, the reason my sight has gone to ****, is because i have spent many hours in front of a monitor.
Well, my wife is an Optometrist and according to her, using a monitor doesn't affect your prescription.

Everyone needs reading glasses as they get older. Little you can do about it. Usually it affects people aged about 40 but can vary either side.
mireOpekrhype is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 04:45 PM   #3
Amomiamup

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Stop *******.
Amomiamup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 04:54 PM   #4
Serereids

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
Stop *******.
Impossible.
Serereids is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 05:29 PM   #5
Caunnysup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Buy a bigger monitor. I know Bungle thinks it's a good idea to spend your working life on a 14" CRT but really, squinting at stuff does not help.
Caunnysup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 05:50 PM   #6
Kuncher

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
Well, my wife is an Optometrist and according to her, using a monitor doesn't affect your prescription.

Everyone needs reading glasses as they get older. Little you can do about it. Usually it affects people aged about 40 but can vary either side.
Exactly, correlation does not imply causation. Using a monitor can cause eye strain, which can lead to temporary problems but it does no damage. A good nights' rest and your eyes will return to their normal state. If your vision is getting progressively worse, it's likely because of your genes and not anything you've done (unless you've taken to staring at the sun).
Kuncher is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 05:56 PM   #7
Caunnysup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Exactly, correlation does not imply causation. Using a monitor can cause eye strain, which can lead to temporary problems but it does no damage. A good nights' rest and your eyes will return to their normal state. If your vision is getting progressively worse, it's likely because of your genes and not anything you've done (unless you've taken to staring at the sun).
I don't think that using a monitor in itself does any harm (people have been watching TV for decades), but surely having to squint at a small picture all day, every day doesn't help?
Caunnysup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:03 PM   #8
dosyrotsbop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, because people who use less than a 32" widescreen monitor can't even see wtf they are doing! I mean it's not like everyone managed perfectly well with smaller monitors for years......right?
dosyrotsbop is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:06 PM   #9
Caunnysup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, because people who use less than a 32" widescreen monitor can't even see wtf they are doing! I mean it's not like everyone managed perfectly well with smaller monitors for years......right?
Firstly, it was a 23" monitor which is a pretty much perfect size.

Secondly, people coped because they had to.
Caunnysup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:14 PM   #10
dosyrotsbop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Firstly, it was a 23" monitor which is a pretty much perfect size.

Secondly, people coped because they had to.
The way you're talking you'd think in the past everyone had to make regular visits to an optician because they had to "squint" to see what they had on the monitor, which is bollocks. Having a smaller monitor doesn't necessarily mean everything on it is smaller, it just means you have less screen real estate to play with.

You've fallen into the trap of "we couldn't possibly cope with anything less than we have now", when people in the past DID cope, and coped very well.
dosyrotsbop is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:15 PM   #11
hexniks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
581
Senior Member
Default
Firstly, it was a 23" monitor which is a pretty much perfect size.

Secondly, people coped because they had to.
You don't have to be squinting more on a 19" screen with a lower resolution than you do on a 23" with a fullHD or higher res...
hexniks is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:23 PM   #12
Caunnysup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
The way you're talking you'd think in the past everyone had to make regular visits to an optician because they had to "squint" to see what they had on the monitor, which is bollocks.
Which part of "but really, squinting at stuff does not help." sent you spinning off into sensationalised land?

When you have the option to help employees out for the sake of £50 there is no reason not to.
Caunnysup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:23 PM   #13
Caunnysup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
You don't have to be squinting more on a 19" screen with a lower resolution than you do on a 23" with a fullHD or higher res...
Depends how far away it is!
Caunnysup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:30 PM   #14
hexniks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
581
Senior Member
Default
Depends how far away it is!
It should be the same really, of course if it's up to 50 pounds to giving your employees more screen estate than it would be silly to deny them that and limit your productivity.
hexniks is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:33 PM   #15
mireOpekrhype

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
Exactly, correlation does not imply causation. Using a monitor can cause eye strain, which can lead to temporary problems but it does no damage. A good nights' rest and your eyes will return to their normal state. If your vision is getting progressively worse, it's likely because of your genes and not anything you've done (unless you've taken to staring at the sun).
It's not necessarily genetic. Certain eye conditions and prescriptions can be, but the need for reading glasses past a certain age is pretty much universal.

I believe it is something to do with the muscles weakening in, or around, the eye which make it harder to maintain a focus at a short distance.

It's age related.

According to my Missus, if you stared constantly at a monitor for hours and hours a day it may have a limited affect on your prescription, but the fact is you would need to be staring at a fixed distance constantly. Many people using a monitor will not be staring at it incessantly.

She can probably explain it better than me lol given that she is a consultant optometrist for Laser Surgery.
mireOpekrhype is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:40 PM   #16
dosyrotsbop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Which part of "but really, squinting at stuff does not help." sent you spinning off into sensationalised land?

When you have the option to help employees out for the sake of £50 there is no reason not to.
You're the one being sensationalist. First you claim everyone was "squinting" at their monitors in the past (which is bollocks), and secondly you seem to think buying a bigger monitor will help the OP (which it won't) when you don't even know what size monitor he is using atm!
dosyrotsbop is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:52 PM   #17
Kuncher

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
It's not necessarily genetic. Certain eye conditions and prescriptions can be, but the need for reading glasses past a certain age is pretty much universal.

I believe it is something to do with the muscles weakening in, or around, the eye which make it harder to maintain a focus at a short distance.

It's age related.

According to my Missus, if you stared constantly at a monitor for hours and hours a day it may have a limited affect on your prescription, but the fact is you would need to be staring at a fixed distance constantly. Many people using a monitor will not be staring at it incessantly.

She can probably explain it better than me lol given that she is a consultant optometrist for Laser Surgery.
I agree it's age related, but the specifics of how you age is genetically determined to a large degree.
Kuncher is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 07:24 PM   #18
salomal-qask

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
If you're concerned about your sight, go see an Ophthalmologist if you haven't already, and get a checkup. I wouldn't recommend an Optometrist, personally. An Ophthalmologist is an MD, while a Optometrist is not, at least here in the US. While an Optometrist is good, an Ophthalmologist is better, as they provide a broader range of care.
salomal-qask is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 07:49 PM   #19
Caunnysup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
You're the one being sensationalist. First you claim everyone was "squinting" at their monitors in the past (which is bollocks), and secondly you seem to think buying a bigger monitor will help the OP (which it won't) when you don't even know what size monitor he is using atm!
Have you been out in the sun?
Caunnysup is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 08:33 PM   #20
mireOpekrhype

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
If you're concerned about your sight, go see an Ophthalmologist if you haven't already, and get a checkup. I wouldn't recommend an Optometrist, personally. An Ophthalmologist is an MD, while a Optometrist is not, at least here in the US. While an Optometrist is good, an Ophthalmologist is better, as they provide a broader range of care.
Similar in the UK.

My wife cannot prescribe medication and must refer anyone who needs such treatment to a GP or local hospital (depending on severity of issue).

I agree an Ophthalmologist can provide a wider range of care but in the first instance, unless you are really concerned with your vision, an Optometrist would normally be your first call for a standard eye-test.

Whilst they may need to refer you, a good OpTom should be able to spot most things. Think the best my wife did was with a young kid who's mother had brought him for an eye test as he was complaining of headaches whilst working at school. 10 minutes later mother and kid were in a taxi heading to the local hospital when my wife spotted the cause of the headaches - a tumour.
mireOpekrhype is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity