LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-11-2009, 04:17 AM   #1
wpFWNoIt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default Would falling into a black hole...
hurt


Ive been on youtube for far to long.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW7BvabYnn8


The thing is I find them both fascinating and scary.
wpFWNoIt is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 04:22 AM   #2
sandracuk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
674
Senior Member
Default
you would be crushed to death even before you fell into it.

but....

the narrator reminds me of The G-Man
sandracuk is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 04:24 AM   #3
u2ZQGC6b

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
You wouldn't be crushed, you would be ripped apart.
u2ZQGC6b is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 04:26 AM   #4
RgtrsKfR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
The tidal forces of the Black Hole would stretch you like ElastiGirl. I'd guess that would hurt the untrained ones with no superpowers. A bit.
RgtrsKfR is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 04:42 AM   #5
C7JjVczP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Yup...the only thing i can think of that would emerge from the otherside of a blackhole is just particles of the previous objects which entered it
C7JjVczP is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 05:07 AM   #6
IamRobot

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
If she's loose enough for you to fall into it, I don't think so.
IamRobot is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 05:45 AM   #7
b3JOkwXL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
the narrator reminds me of The G-Man
That's what I was thinking. [thumbup]
b3JOkwXL is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 06:32 AM   #8
isopsmypovA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Oboy that was interesting! Pity we know so little
isopsmypovA is offline


Old 05-11-2009, 07:55 AM   #9
sandracuk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
674
Senior Member
Default
That's what I was thinking. [thumbup]
if his voice was slower it would be spot on [yes]
sandracuk is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 08:58 AM   #10
Flieteewell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
That's what I was thinking. [thumbup]
Hahaha +1 [thumbup]
Flieteewell is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 09:22 AM   #11
Flieteewell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
I just fell in love with this releated video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5_Msrdg3Hk&NR=1
Flieteewell is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 04:41 PM   #12
Loolasant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
I dont think it would. Black holes act at a molecular level....I think......too early for this..... so it wouldnt be warping/tearing your arm as say car attached with rope and pulling it off.
Loolasant is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 06:00 PM   #13
DenisLevvin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
Question: Giant Star explodes, creates black holes.

From my understanding it's the big stars that create black holes wheras the smaller ones just explode and nothing else.

Why didn't the big bang turn into a black hole? I mean the amount of energy/mass that it would have produced would have been well, bigger then every star/planet/particle combined.

And another question. When an object gets to big and has to much mass they turn into gas right? That's why planets such as Jupiter, Saturn etc are all gas and there are no known planets that have solid surface that large.

So the beginning of the universe would of likely been gas? or plasma or something?
DenisLevvin is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 06:06 PM   #14
Plulpangepler

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default
The rules of the universe did not exist/were different at the big bang. As the universe cooled the forces actually separated (to begin with gravity and electromagnatism were part of the same force for example).

As for the larger planets being gas, it just has to do with the kind of debris left over from the star forming more than anything.

The beginning of the universe was ENERGY in pure form. It was too hot for particles to exist (they just got destroyed and turned into energy if they happened to form).
Plulpangepler is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 06:11 PM   #15
Loolasant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Question: Giant Star explodes, creates black holes.

From my understanding it's the big stars that create black holes wheras the smaller ones just explode and nothing else.

Why didn't the big bang turn into a black hole? I mean the amount of energy/mass that it would have produced would have been well, bigger then every star/planet/particle combined.

And another question. When an object gets to big and has to much mass they turn into gas right? That's why planets such as Jupiter, Saturn etc are all gas and there are no known planets that have solid surface that large.

So the beginning of the universe would of likely been gas? or plasma or something?
Whos to say there isnt a Super Massive black hole out there?

Just because we dont know about it, doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

The beginning of the Universe, if your thinking about a singular point, started out as an explosion of that single point. Then the beginning, the "thing" that exploded was neither solid or non existent.

Imaging a clock (ignoring time for a second here, just the image of the clock will do), The number 0 and the number 60 are at the same point. So both nothing and something exists at the same time.
Loolasant is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 07:02 PM   #16
u2ZQGC6b

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
Question: Giant Star explodes, creates black holes.

From my understanding it's the big stars that create black holes wheras the smaller ones just explode and nothing else.

Why didn't the big bang turn into a black hole? I mean the amount of energy/mass that it would have produced would have been well, bigger then every star/planet/particle combined.

And another question. When an object gets to big and has to much mass they turn into gas right? That's why planets such as Jupiter, Saturn etc are all gas and there are no known planets that have solid surface that large.

So the beginning of the universe would of likely been gas? or plasma or something?
Good questions. And I doubt that anyone who doesn't study the subject has answers to these questions. I will attempt to add some thoughts here.

First, what is mass? Why do things have mass? Is this a property exclusively for matter? If so, there might not have been mass at the start of the universe. I do know that there was no matter right after the "big bang" and thus no gas. If you're interested in this subject, you might want to search for terms like "inflation" and "pre-inflation".

The state of matter has to do with the pressure and the temperature. I guess it should be possible for a very large solid object to exist if the pressure/density is high enough and the temperature low enough.
u2ZQGC6b is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 07:29 PM   #17
Plulpangepler

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default


Here is what I am talking about. The forces we know, dont exist at the temperatures of the start of the universe.
Plulpangepler is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 10:05 PM   #18
Flerdourdyged

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
OMG YOUTUBE HAS VIDEO ADS....
Flerdourdyged is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 10:45 PM   #19
Loolasant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
OMG YOUTUBE HAS VIDEO ADS....
Video aids?
Loolasant is offline


Old 06-10-2009, 11:12 PM   #20
wpFWNoIt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Spaghettification

Probably be over in a few milliseconds, so....... most likely you wouldn't have time to feel anything.
wpFWNoIt is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity