General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
in South Africa.
A pigeon can send a 4GB file over 60 miles in 2 hours[thumbup], ![]() But is there any way to prevent cats from eating my carrier pigeon? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
This sort of article is so misleading. A pigeon carrying a memory stick is an obscure scenario, and these pigeons can't really be directed to go to whatever house you want on a few seconds notice can they? They also give no consideration to how long it takes to transfer the data onto the memory stick and then read it off the stick at the other end. Then they provide a percentage of total transfer instead of just giving an average transfer rate, to further obscure the facts. And 60 miles? the strength of the Internet is not that you can transfer data 60 miles, but you can transfer it 600 miles and beyond.
It just has no sensible relation. You could send a hard drive with a terrabyte of data by express post to a few towns over and it would go faster than South-Korean broadband, but what does it mean? Not much. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
This sort of article is so misleading. A pigeon carrying a memory stick is an obscure scenario, and these pigeons can't really be directed to go to whatever house you want on a few seconds notice can they? They also give no consideration to how long it takes to transfer the data onto the memory stick and then read it off the stick at the other end. Then they provide a percentage of total transfer instead of just giving an average transfer rate, to further obscure the facts. And 60 miles? the strength of the Internet is not that you can transfer data 60 miles, but you can transfer it 600 miles and beyond. Also the 2 hours included an hour to transfer the info from the memory stick. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Didn't the article say ADSL and not broadband? That's a huge difference.. You can go 7.2Mbit on HSDPA, but for the price per MB... it's only useful for browsing, and not downloading. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Didn't the article say ADSL and not broadband? That's a huge difference.. Any data transmittion protocol / compression that results in more bandwidth over another since it provides a wider band or broaderband for data transmittion is considered broadband. ADSL currently tops out at 24Mbps, in terms of the average consumers internet connection speed, ADSL is still a considerably high bandwidth line; broadband |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
it sounds like technology in general is just lacking behind there. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|