General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
This
http://www.dailytech.com/Verdict+in+...ticle16034.htm Then this http://www.dailytech.com/Skanks+in+N...ticle16061.htm How is Google meant to win? Some chick calls another chick a skank. The "sk@nk" then takes Google to court to find out who called her a skank and the judge forces Google to reveal who did it. That person is now sueing Google for invasion of Privacy for $US15M I honestly don't know what to say. The two women apparently know each other. It's like they are doing this to get an extra $15M in their pockets. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
I dont understand how the chick intends to win? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
That's what I was thinking. Why would she even bother. but it's the US, you can practically sue for anything over there[no]. You can present a case at any time....but this case is going to get thrown out in two seconds and you will never hear of it ever again. That's what happens ALL THE TIME. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Bleh this is what you people don't get. What is shocking is that a court took the original case, not this one. ooh, a model was called a ho and a skank...big effing deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|