[priordine]

http://www.guzer.com/videos/bad-day-at-the-office.php

[EtellaObtaite]

break stuff would have been a more appropriate limp bizkit song to play
________
Lamborghini LM001 specifications

[Gideleb]

Someone has a case of the Mondays!

[Haibundadam]

It's pathetic. The room is full of people, and they just let him go wild. Did you see him throw the monitor at that woman? That could've seriously injured her (I don't know that it didn't).

Pathetic. This dude just didn't get hit when he threw tantrums as a kid. That's the problem. He didn't really lose it, he was just throwing a tantrum. You can see him retreat from people who finally try to restrain him... and when they grab him, he doesn't really fight back. You know how I know that - the dude was of a decent size, and I've seen what happens when people actually resist. If someone went up to him, and punched him in the face, this whole thing would've been over... regardless of whether the punch was strong enough to knock out a fly.

[Daruhuw]

It's pathetic. The room is full of people, and they just let him go wild. Did you see him throw the monitor at that woman? That could've seriously injured her (I don't know that it didn't).

Pathetic. This dude just didn't get hit when he threw tantrums as a kid. That's the problem. He didn't really lose it, he was just throwing a tantrum. You can see him retreat from people who finally try to restrain him... and when they grab him, he doesn't really fight back. You know how I know that - the dude was of a decent size, and I've seen what happens when people actually resist. If someone went up to him, and punched him in the face, this whole thing would've been over... regardless of whether the punch was strong enough to knock out a fly.

wow, is there anyone besides the woman who got the monitor thrown at her that isnt accused of their perplexity ?

[flopay]

jesus christ thats the worst office meltdown i've seen (besides shooting)

[IRMartin]

It's pathetic. The room is full of people, and they just let him go wild. Did you see him throw the monitor at that woman? That could've seriously injured her (I don't know that it didn't).

Pathetic. This dude just didn't get hit when he threw tantrums as a kid. That's the problem. He didn't really lose it, he was just throwing a tantrum. You can see him retreat from people who finally try to restrain him... and when they grab him, he doesn't really fight back. You know how I know that - the dude was of a decent size, and I've seen what happens when people actually resist. If someone went up to him, and punched him in the face, this whole thing would've been over... regardless of whether the punch was strong enough to knock out a fly.

I find myself agreeing with you,all those people and they just stood back and didn't do a thing....weird.

[Thomaswhitee]

Yeah I'm surprised some people let it go on for as long as it did.

Still that's some crazy ass melt down.

[Filmania]

Yeah I'm surprised some people let it go on for as long as it did.

Still that's some crazy ass melt down.

Besides the woman getting hit with the monitor I would have sat back and watched. Definitely would make for a non boring day at the office.

But yeah after seeing the woman get hit like that I prolly would have gotten raged a bit.

[AlistDakisa]

They were all probably laughing too much to stop him.. That poor woman got caned by the monitor though. :/

[fedelwfget]

why put your health or life in risk when you can sit back and run if necessary?

[VladFal]

Isn't this just an old fake video? http://tbekmambetov.livejournal.com/7022.html

[ThomasMannfanny]

Just sucks for the woman who got the monitor

[tarmpriopay]

To be fair the woman got hit with the monitor very early on, and the only two guys close to him had either been smacked in the head or pushed to the ground.

After that everyone kept their distance until security arrived, which was the correct thing to do in my book.

[buchmausar]

To be fair the woman got hit with the monitor very early on, and the only two guys close to him had either been smacked in the head or pushed to the ground.

After that everyone kept their distance until security arrived, which was the correct thing to do in my book.

I have no choice but to agree with you unfortunately. If anyone tried to even so much as restrain him he could sue them. Pathetic but true. You can't do anything to help anyone these days without getting into a heap-o-sh*t.

I was quite shocked when I learnt at school that if someone was suffering from an attack (illness or mental whatever) and was dying or injured and even if everyone in the class knew exactly how to help they are forced not to and just let that person suffer. The most someone can do is call for help. As soon as they try to help the person themselves they can get into serious trouble, whether it be expulsion, charged or even jailed.

I on the other hand wouldn't care if I got into sh*t, someones life is more important then the rules made up by d*cks to prevent helping of others. As much as I would have stood back and let the guy tear up the place, throwing a monitor at an innocant person is just going to far.

[kjanyeaz1]

I have no choice but to agree with you unfortunately. If anyone tried to even so much as restrain him he could sue them. Pathetic but true. You can't do anything to help anyone these days without getting into a heap-o-sh*t.

I was quite shocked when I learnt at school that if someone was suffering from an attack (illness or mental whatever) and was dying or injured and even if everyone in the class knew exactly how to help they are forced not to and just let that person suffer. The most someone can do is call for help. As soon as they try to help the person themselves they can get into serious trouble, whether it be expulsion, charged or even jailed.

I on the other hand wouldn't care if I got into sh*t, someones life is more important then the rules made up by d*cks to prevent helping of others. As much as I would have stood back and let the guy tear up the place, throwing a monitor at an innocant person is just going to far.

Maybe in Australia but not in the US

[Haibundadam]

why put your health or life in risk when you can sit back and run if necessary?

Because you're not a douchebag and actually have some balls?

[buchmausar]

Maybe in Australia but not in the US

I believe it's a legal thing. As in if you help and something goes wrong then you have a lawsuit on your hands. That's why nobody can help anymore[thumbdown]

[kjanyeaz1]

I believe it's a legal thing. As in if you help and something goes wrong then you have a lawsuit on your hands. That's why nobody can help anymore[thumbdown]

We have two different civil cases...Good Samaritan laws protect those who attempt to help (they can vary by state) and also, there is no duty to rescue either in the US.

[zdoppiklonikaa]

We have two different civil cases...Good Samaritan laws protect those who attempt to help (they can vary by state) and also, there is no duty to rescue either in the US.

while there may be no duty to rescue (yeah i aint jumping into a flodded river to save you), i do believe there are failure to render aid laws...at least where i live.

i.e. can't watch someone wreck their car into a pole out in the middle of nowhere and just drive off an leave them.

It used to be like what FAKE is saying here in the states...save someone from choking and break a rib in doing so, they could sue. Glad they fixed this one.