General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
This should be entertaining [yes]
New RIAA Lawsuit Defense Tactic: Admit Liability, Challenge the Law |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
If i were ordered to pay 200+K for songs being shared on a p2p network, I would tell them all to go eat ****!!
I dont understand how they expect a person with a middle class income to pay such a fine... That amount of money would make almost anyone bankrupt, so I would just leave the country and settle in some caribbean country |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
If i were ordered to pay 200+K for songs being shared on a p2p network, I would tell them all to go eat ****!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
The RIAA claims that file sharers are liable for infringement solely for making available copyrighted works of music on peer-to-peer file sharing networks. Among the reasons the RIAA makes such an argument is because it's technologically impossible to know if a file sharer's music has been downloaded by somebody who has not been authorized to copy it. Ahh yes, the ol' "You're guilty even though there is no evidence of a crime being committed" strategy. I guess that beats the "Innocent until proven guilty" mindset this country is so obsessed with.[rolleyes]
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
For me, the most interesting thing is that the Bush administration felt the need to take a direct stand (and to thus interfere) in/on the case. Consistently again and again, time after time, when this administration has to choose between the people and progress or the corporations and the status quo....... [thumbdown]
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|