LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-11-2007, 01:40 AM   #61
Nicihntm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
562
Senior Member
Default
pah asteroids are boring...

soooooooooo

what would be the safest place to be if the earth was hit by a haemoroid ?
Nicihntm is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 01:52 AM   #62
HakTaisanip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
Bradford or Birmingham or Wolves
HakTaisanip is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 01:52 AM   #63
Dominick Yo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
North Yorkshire would be awesome.
North Yorkshire, England
What the hell is your problem with North Yorkshire? I can't think of any place in North Yorkshire I dislike.
Dominick Yo is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 01:56 AM   #64
Nicihntm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
562
Senior Member
Default
You've perhaps misread the term "radiation" in the context is was used in - for example, radiation is often applied to electromagnetic waves. Although asteroids certainly contain radioactive elements, they don't carry anything near the quantity or type necessary to initiate a mass burst of nuclear radiation upon impact. The heat from the collision might cause some fusion to take place but, again, it wouldn't cause serious amounts of radiation.
hes probably thinking of radiated heat in the form of a massive fireball

unless of course the aseroid was made up of plutonium
Nicihntm is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:15 AM   #65
evarekataVame

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
590
Senior Member
Default
North Yorkshire, England
North Yorkshire would be awesome.
hey! thats not very nice.
evarekataVame is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:32 AM   #66
dmitrynts

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
The carwash across the street.
Anything to stop the customers from blaring-out that constant barrage farckin' reggaeton music while they spit-shine their cars. [cursing]
dmitrynts is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:37 AM   #67
Caregrasy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
actually a single impact might not have kill the dinosaur at all... newer studies shows the single impact kill scenario as being unlikely, it maybe that there were a few impact!

if the rock is very BIG, earth gravity may cause enough stress on the rock to break it apart (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roche_limit). we won't be looking at 1 "killzone" but many... carpet bombing style...


so maybe you would ask for a list of impact site instead of believing in hollywood's single impact theory.
The rouche limit only applies to objects orbiting a planet, not to an asteroid smashing straight into a planet.
Caregrasy is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:38 AM   #68
CO2490pL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Basically what we should do is build a triangle shaped space ship to shoot the asteroids into two pieces, then shoot those pieces into even smaller pieces. This way we wont have to worry about it actually hitting the earth.
CO2490pL is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:40 AM   #69
ChuttyAmult

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Ninja7 This message is hidden because Ninja7 is on your ignore list.


Why did I put you on my ignore list?
ChuttyAmult is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:41 AM   #70
Nicihntm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
562
Senior Member
Default
Basically what we should do is build a triangle shaped space ship to shoot the asteroids into two pieces, then shoot those pieces into even smaller pieces. This way we wont have to worry about it actually hitting the earth.
yeah and make it overly hard to control
Nicihntm is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 02:41 AM   #71
Caregrasy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
Basically what we should do is build a triangle shaped space ship to shoot the asteroids into two pieces, then shoot those pieces into even smaller pieces. This way we wont have to worry about it actually hitting the earth.
How are we supposed to stop a 10km (6 mile) wide asteroid with today's technology?
Caregrasy is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 03:00 AM   #72
CO2490pL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
How are we supposed to stop a 10km (6 mile) wide asteroid with today's technology?
We have the technology, the ship will be powered using a MOS 6502 which should give it more than enough grunt to split an asteroid easily in two pieces.
CO2490pL is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 03:06 AM   #73
OnlineViagraCheapestFREE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
Holland!

/ checks average height above sea level....

No - wait!........

[rofl]
OnlineViagraCheapestFREE is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 03:46 AM   #74
pharmablogger

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
unless of course the aseroid was made up of plutonium
Plutonium in asteroids and the like, found today, is pretty low in radiation; since asteroids formed in our solar system at the same time as the Earth did, only Pu-244 would be around in any decent amount (as it has the longest half-life). But this, in turn, would mean it's level of radioactivity is really low.

Basically, asteroids just aren't radioactive enough to worry us - the fact that they're travelling at ludicrous speeds, with a shed load of mass, is though...
pharmablogger is offline


Old 12-11-2007, 03:48 AM   #75
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
Holland!

/ checks average height above sea level....

No - wait!........

[rofl]
Not funny, I'm already preparing my son to swim to school in a couple off years
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity