The Simpsons Movie. Who's going to see it? - Page 3 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**ancexiaepidge** · 07-30-2007, 05:06 AM

Good movie, but i expected much more. Its like they took 1 episodes and made it in to a longer episode.

Family guy movie was better.

**GillTeepbew** · 07-30-2007, 05:19 AM

average overall...

i did not like barts attitude towards flanders... also i think it woud have been much cooler if bruns would have been the villain... not some random dude from some organisation...

**pBiRXp8u** · 07-30-2007, 05:39 AM

average overall...

i did not like barts attitude towards flanders... also i think it woud have been much cooler if bruns would have been the villain... not some random dude from some organisation...

Barts attitude was odd, indeed. Not like we haven't seen the change in heart in previous episodes though...but repeated again?

I really felt the lack of other characters playing any meaningful role too, we hardly saw them. Surely if this is a movie, a climax of the all the series, then surely the majority of characters should have a role?

**WenPyclenoWex** · 07-30-2007, 05:59 AM

I thought it was ok.

Was expecting it to be a bag of laughs but it was very broken.

**Biassasecumma** · 07-30-2007, 07:21 AM

I watched it earlier today,
tbh i think my expectations where a bit to high.
Imo it was o.k, just kinda like a long Simpsons episode,
nothing to write home about though.

**Trotoleterm** · 07-30-2007, 09:51 AM

Just curious, how would you have liked the other characters tied in? There were plenty of other characters, with just as much time spent on them as in the episodes. Afterall, this was the Simpsons Movie, not The Movie About Springfield.

I was laughing the entire time. I think alot of you just try and over analyze things simply because the show is 18 years old. But that's just my opinion.

**poulaMahmah** · 07-30-2007, 11:34 AM

Just curious, how would you have liked the other characters tied in? There were plenty of other characters, with just as much time spent on them as in the episodes. Afterall, this was the Simpsons Movie, not The Movie About Springfield. I was laughing the entire time. I think alot of you just try and over analyze things simply because the show is 18 years old. But that's just my opinion.

My thoughts exactly![thumbup]

**johnstylet** · 07-30-2007, 12:53 PM

the incredible is that it is in the top 250 movies in imdb .... that could change obver time ... and I hope so lol

**GillTeepbew** · 07-30-2007, 03:35 PM

Just curious, how would you have liked the other characters tied in? There were plenty of other characters, with just as much time spent on them as in the episodes. Afterall, this was the Simpsons Movie, not The Movie About Springfield. I was laughing the entire time. I think alot of you just try and over analyze things simply because the show is 18 years old. But that's just my opinion.

I dont think just because they are all running around banging on a glass wall they are tied into the story...

Of course its the simpson movie, but i really dont want to see a disney persiflage where birds and deer take their clothes away and watch them bonk each other. (yes it was funny

)

Also Bart wearing this bra (im the mascot of an evil multinational company... [thumbup] )

But why do they have to make references to this/other movies... companies when their own franchise is over 18 years old. They could persiflage themselves and it would be even funnier

**Soassesaisp** · 07-30-2007, 05:44 PM

Isnt there supposed to be more than one movie coming out?

**cemDrymnVem** · 07-30-2007, 06:50 PM

But why do they have to make references to this/other movies... companies when their own franchise is over 18 years old. They could persiflage themselves and it would be even funnier

They are and that's what is bad about the newer episodes.

**GillTeepbew** · 07-30-2007, 08:14 PM

Oh they are? Never noticed in the newer episodes...

07-30-2007, 05:06 AM	#41
ancexiaepidge Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 409 Senior Member	Good movie, but i expected much more. Its like they took 1 episodes and made it in to a longer episode. Family guy movie was better. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 05:19 AM	#42
GillTeepbew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 416 Senior Member	average overall... i did not like barts attitude towards flanders... also i think it woud have been much cooler if bruns would have been the villain... not some random dude from some organisation... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 05:39 AM	#43
pBiRXp8u Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 447 Senior Member	average overall... i did not like barts attitude towards flanders... also i think it woud have been much cooler if bruns would have been the villain... not some random dude from some organisation... Barts attitude was odd, indeed. Not like we haven't seen the change in heart in previous episodes though...but repeated again? I really felt the lack of other characters playing any meaningful role too, we hardly saw them. Surely if this is a movie, a climax of the all the series, then surely the majority of characters should have a role? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 05:59 AM	#44
WenPyclenoWex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 442 Senior Member	I thought it was ok. Was expecting it to be a bag of laughs but it was very broken. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 07:21 AM	#45
Biassasecumma Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 740 Senior Member	I watched it earlier today, tbh i think my expectations where a bit to high. Imo it was o.k, just kinda like a long Simpsons episode, nothing to write home about though. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 09:51 AM	#46
Trotoleterm Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 415 Senior Member	Just curious, how would you have liked the other characters tied in? There were plenty of other characters, with just as much time spent on them as in the episodes. Afterall, this was the Simpsons Movie, not The Movie About Springfield. I was laughing the entire time. I think alot of you just try and over analyze things simply because the show is 18 years old. But that's just my opinion. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 11:34 AM	#47
poulaMahmah Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	Just curious, how would you have liked the other characters tied in? There were plenty of other characters, with just as much time spent on them as in the episodes. Afterall, this was the Simpsons Movie, not The Movie About Springfield. I was laughing the entire time. I think alot of you just try and over analyze things simply because the show is 18 years old. But that's just my opinion. My thoughts exactly![thumbup] Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 12:53 PM	#48
johnstylet Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 507 Senior Member	the incredible is that it is in the top 250 movies in imdb .... that could change obver time ... and I hope so lol Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 03:35 PM	#49
GillTeepbew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 416 Senior Member	Just curious, how would you have liked the other characters tied in? There were plenty of other characters, with just as much time spent on them as in the episodes. Afterall, this was the Simpsons Movie, not The Movie About Springfield. I was laughing the entire time. I think alot of you just try and over analyze things simply because the show is 18 years old. But that's just my opinion. I dont think just because they are all running around banging on a glass wall they are tied into the story... Of course its the simpson movie, but i really dont want to see a disney persiflage where birds and deer take their clothes away and watch them bonk each other. (yes it was funny ) Also Bart wearing this bra (im the mascot of an evil multinational company... [thumbup] ) But why do they have to make references to this/other movies... companies when their own franchise is over 18 years old. They could persiflage themselves and it would be even funnier Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 05:44 PM	#50
Soassesaisp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 393 Senior Member	Isnt there supposed to be more than one movie coming out? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 06:50 PM	#51
cemDrymnVem Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 444 Senior Member	But why do they have to make references to this/other movies... companies when their own franchise is over 18 years old. They could persiflage themselves and it would be even funnier They are and that's what is bad about the newer episodes. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-30-2007, 08:14 PM	#52
GillTeepbew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 416 Senior Member	Oh they are? Never noticed in the newer episodes... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)