[IronpumpedLady]

any watch that has diamonds around the bezel screems tacky ness no matter how expensive

less is more, and even then it's women only

[harriettvanders]

less is more, and even then it's women only

yup and more importantly its the movement that makes the watch.

ive always liked swiss watches

[Misebeita]

that looks fugly, i dont understand watches costing that much - if you got a watch for £1000 people would still be just as impressed

That's still far more than any watch is worth,who even needs a watch anymore?

[machpamb]

[quote=Aramchek;327657]That's still far more than any watch is worth,who even needs a watch anymore?[/quote]

you dont wanna know what the time is?

[harriettvanders]

That's still far more than any watch is worth,who even needs a watch anymore?

i do...

I dont want to get my phone out everytime i want to know the time or ask someone..

unless of course you can read the sky to see what time it is.

[Misebeita]

[quote=Looony;327663]

That's still far more than any watch is worth,who even needs a watch anymore?[/quote]

you dont wanna know what the time is?

There are clocks everywhere,especially on those little portable communication devices that everyone has to have their head glued to nowadays.

And OHP,that's not a example of "need",that's an example of "want".

[harriettvanders]

[QUOTE=Aramchek;327670]

There are clocks everywhere,especially on those little portable communication devices that everyone has to have their head glued to nowadays.

And OHP,that's not a example of "need",that's an example of "want".

I need a watch

I use it for zulu time ect.

so the watch I have is a dual time watch.

although its a nice watch somewhat overly expensive i require it for every day use

[Acalsenunse]

I think I'll just stick to buying something $500 AU.

Once you get up to that mark the style differences while looking at them normally are quite hard to distinguish between that and something worth a few thousand.