LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-13-2011, 07:50 PM   #1
immelawealecy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default Social Security: Why would the checks stop?
President Obama on Tuesday said he cannot guarantee that retirees will receive their Social Security checks August 3 if Democrats and Republicans in Washington do not reach an agreement on reducing the deficit in the coming weeks. Typical scare tactics. But since both parties do it, I guess I shouldn't complain too much, but it is annoying.
immelawealecy is offline


Old 07-13-2011, 09:09 PM   #2
QvhhbjLy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
Yes, one party's only interest is staying in power, and the other's is returning to power. The common person doesn't fit into either's plan except as a pawn to vote for them.
QvhhbjLy is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 01:52 AM   #3
GrileVege

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
629
Senior Member
Default
That's not the same as money.
Sending out social security checks will not increase the national debt (which is what the debt ceiling limits) but will increase the debt owed to the public.
GrileVege is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 01:59 AM   #4
Z3s9vQZj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Sending out social security checks will not increase the national debt (which is what the debt ceiling limits) but will increase the debt owed to the public.
huh?
Z3s9vQZj is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 02:07 AM   #5
Starichok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
I thought you were disputing the claim that the debt ceiling wouldn't stop social security checks? Never mind.
I'm not disputing that but can you explain what you said.
Starichok is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 03:30 AM   #6
Greactbet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
Social Security cannot increase the debt because when push comes to shove it must support itself by cashing in the mature debt it holds. This does cost the government money, but it actually reduces the debt.
Greactbet is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 03:31 AM   #7
Anckzxik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Social Security cannot increase the debt because when push comes to shove it must support itself by cashing in the mature debt it holds. This does cost the government money, but it actually reduces the debt.
Do the iou's count as the national debt? No one ever bought that debt.
Anckzxik is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 05:21 AM   #8
kavaTeexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure the iou's don't count. So reducing them will not reduce the national debt.
kavaTeexy is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 05:24 AM   #9
Relsenlilky

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
Yes, the IOU's in the Social Security trust fund are part of the national debt. When social security checks are sent, the size of the trust fund decreases and the debt held by the public (debts that people actually bought) increases but there is no change in the national debt.
I can't post links, but I read that the ious don't count.
Relsenlilky is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 05:42 AM   #10
blankostaroe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
One of the many, many, many problems with our country is that one political party has little interest in governing, and the other party has none.

Which party is which is as changable as the weather.
Iraq war doesn't happen with a democrat in the White House.
blankostaroe is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 07:24 AM   #11
dHXaE2h9

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
They simply choose another unnecessary country to invade given the Libya example.
Obviously our never ending war in Libya will cost trillions over 8 years. What, with our ground presence and the insurgency we're fighting.
dHXaE2h9 is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 07:31 AM   #12
Nabeqiv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
Don't expect DD to make sense.
Nabeqiv is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 09:08 AM   #13
italertb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Iraq war doesn't happen with a democrat in the White House.
Wouldn't be so sure about that. Clinton bombed the **** out of Iraq during his presidency and 9/11 made people on both sides of the aisle crazy.
italertb is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 09:46 AM   #14
DumnEuronoumn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Wouldn't be so sure about that. Clinton bombed the **** out of Iraq during his presidency and 9/11 made people on both sides of the aisle crazy.
Imagine Al ****ing Gore for a minute. This revisionist idea that it was inevitable has got to be stopped.
DumnEuronoumn is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 09:49 AM   #15
advabHixavoip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure the iou's don't count. So reducing them will not reduce the national debt.
There are no IOUs and instead they are Treasury Bonds which, yes, are the very definition of the National Debt and so is counted.
advabHixavoip is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 12:37 PM   #16
MarythePuppy6

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
Wouldn't be so sure about that. Clinton bombed the **** out of Iraq during his presidency and 9/11 made people on both sides of the aisle crazy.
But since there was no real connection between Iraq and 9/11, Gore (or McCain or any other potential president of either party) wouldn't have gone into Iraq. Afghanistan yes, but not Iraq. That was entirely the doing of Bush's neo-con advisors.
MarythePuppy6 is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 04:15 PM   #17
JakilSong

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
But since there was no real connection between Iraq and 9/11, Gore (or McCain or any other potential president of either party) wouldn't have gone into Iraq. Afghanistan yes, but not Iraq. That was entirely the doing of Bush's neo-con advisors.
McCain absolutely would have gone into Iraq. McCain thinks we belong in Libya. And Al Gore's vice president was Joe Lieberman. I think Gore would have charted a fairly similar foreign policy course, except he would also have been an environmentalist loon.
JakilSong is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 05:16 PM   #18
prowsnobswend

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
I'd put better odds on us finding ManBearPig than WMDs.
They actually did find WMDs, just not many and not nukular.

Why would getting elected turn him into a loon?
This. Not getting elected is what turned Gore into a loon.
prowsnobswend is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 05:37 PM   #19
ansarigf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
I have no idea what you are talking about.
I think you don't know what makes something an asset.
ansarigf is offline


Old 07-14-2011, 07:10 PM   #20
cemDrymnVem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
How is a bond not an "IOU"?
cemDrymnVem is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity