LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-22-2011, 05:49 AM   #1
c-cialis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default Leaving Afghanistan
Following Canada's lead yet again.

I like how the US was begging Canada to stay not a few months ago, now they're shrugging and leaving as well. Classy.
c-cialis is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 06:00 AM   #2
reachmanxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default
Following Canada's lead yet again.

I like how the US was begging Canada to stay not a few months ago, now they're shrugging and leaving as well. Classy.
Did it ever occur to you that this could be another instance of the U.S. saying "Screw this. We're not going it alone."?
reachmanxx is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 07:10 AM   #3
Mmccqrtb

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
Really? U.S. RESERVES are spending tour after tour. I think it's quite likely that politicians are waking up and deciding that this is a hell of a cost, both monetarily and in lives.
Pull out. Let France and Spain... and Canada take their chances with terrorists. I don't say this in an adversarial way, I'm just saying that sometimes things aren't worth the cost, especially when no one else wants to help.
Mmccqrtb is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 08:09 AM   #4
Kneefrenolf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default
This should put things in perspective whenever we talk about any war that US has been in, or is currently in.

Kneefrenolf is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 11:32 AM   #5
gogona

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
tonight Bill O'Reilly said Iran would support the Taliban if we left Afghanistan
gogona is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 12:16 PM   #6
Crazykz

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
Really? U.S. RESERVES are spending tour after tour. I think it's quite likely that politicians are waking up and deciding that this is a hell of a cost, both monetarily and in lives.
Pull out. Let France and Spain... and Canada take their chances with terrorists. I don't say this in an adversarial way, I'm just saying that sometimes things aren't worth the cost, especially when no one else wants to help.
Yay for finally admitting that going in to Afghanistan was wrong. So soon after Iraq too - one would think you Tejans enjoy eating humble pie...
Crazykz is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 01:12 PM   #7
onlineslotetes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
I know. It gets a bit tiresome saying "I told you so" all the time...
onlineslotetes is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 01:23 PM   #8
quack!

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
Libya is doing better than expected, as far as I'm concerned. IIRC I was the one saying it would become a stalemate before anyone else, which is why it was the right course of action IMO.

So yes, I told you so...
quack! is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 02:20 PM   #9
allvideO

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
665
Senior Member
Default
Considering you've been wrong about everything else, it's nice to see you're not changing the habits of a lifetime.

Still, just as well you live in Tejas so you can surround yourself with lots of other ignorant losers so you can feel better about all your own failings...
allvideO is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 04:29 PM   #10
hrthwhr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
I think I do recall correctly, actually. It's all in that other thread, including my prediction that one of the 'borders' was going to be between Brega and Ajdabiya...

Also, it's not a war per se, but a fairly low key rebellion with mostly static lines where the civilians in the most part have fled the fighting, hence the relatively low civilian casualties, and one of the most populous parts of Libya (Benghazi - Tobruk) has been left virtually unscathed, or actually completely untouched from the fighting.

All for a fairly cheap campaign of a few Nato sorties where the members get to use up all their back catalogue of old munitions without the single loss of life to their forces as far as I know of. How cool is that!?

Of course, I would have done it differently up till now and it would have been cheaper still for the allies, but then when you have amateurs in charge...

You OTOH wanted to stand idly by and risk a massacre in Benghazi and the country as a whole and let Gadaffi retake the country and mete out a brutal revenge - because that was what was days from happening! Thank god you're not in charge...
hrthwhr is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 05:05 PM   #11
Sierabiera

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
Really? U.S. RESERVES are spending tour after tour. I think it's quite likely that politicians are waking up and deciding that this is a hell of a cost, both monetarily and in lives.
Pull out. Let France and Spain... and Canada take their chances with terrorists. I don't say this in an adversarial way, I'm just saying that sometimes things aren't worth the cost, especially when no one else wants to help.
Canada's involvement in Afghanistan may've served only to increase our profile to terrorists.
Sierabiera is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 05:40 PM   #12
Eeaquzyh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
@ OP: If you want out so badly, I guess you should never have moved in in the first place.
Eeaquzyh is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 06:23 PM   #13
Gymngatagaica

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
Libya is doing better than expected, as far as I'm concerned. IIRC I was the one saying it would become a stalemate before anyone else, which is why it was the right course of action IMO.

So yes, I told you so...
Everyone save Cockney (post 63 Long drawn out civil war = stalemate) , Arrian (post 176), Cort Haus (numerous) and myself (post 71) that is.

Mobius first mention of stalemate post 178 (March 30)

Revisionism/Prescience/Intellectual dishonesty is a wonderful thing.

Dang - too long on the research x-post with COckney
Gymngatagaica is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 06:59 PM   #14
Ruilnasr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
The Indian Wars were a series of isolated skirmishes with barely-affiliated or nonaffiliated native tribes over the course of a century. Considering them to be part of one long war is really kind of stretching the term.
Ruilnasr is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 08:52 PM   #15
CFstantony

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default
I know of the country Libya, but I've never heard of this country you call Libyia.
CFstantony is offline


Old 06-22-2011, 09:00 PM   #16
SmuffNuSMaxqh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
587
Senior Member
Default
I saw that, too - I also had to think about their inclusion of the entire Cold "War."

There's still a lot of truth in that image's listing of wars. There's no denying that there were a multitude of conflicts between Native Americans and whites during those centuries.

I suppose, if the creator of that graphic wanted, he could have quadrupled the length of that list by listing each individual Native American conflict with whites.
But now do the same list for England from 1066 on...
SmuffNuSMaxqh is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 01:27 AM   #17
AccusaJalsBub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
Targets? From whom? A bunch of western-educated Saudi-Arabians?

Fighting a war for *ever* in Afghanistan isn't going to stop western radicals from doing crazy things. Please don't equate it with WW2 and lend lease. Facing existential destruction from a superpower on the rampage does not equate with a tiny threat from a bunch of nutters.

What's the best you can hope for in Afghanistan? A stable and friendly government like, for example, Pakistan?

Oh.
AccusaJalsBub is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 02:26 AM   #18
CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
Historically, European based countries(americas, europe) have been unstable. The order and stability that we enjoy today was not even there in the 60's. The good ol' days are now. We are living in the most orderly era that western civilization has ever experienced. An even then, we have riots over Ice hockey games. Look back, at the history of ALMOST any country and you will see things are probably better than they were in 1960, 1917, 1862 or any date. If you would have told someone in 1862 that there would eventually be a black president, women would have the right to vote, that air conditioning would be in almost every home or that almost every kid in the u.s. would have the opportunity for an education(instead of working a farm/factory) that person would have called it fantasy. Look at your countries own history whatever it may be and you will probably find things are better now than they where before. There are exceptions, but those are obstacles also that can be overcome.
CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 02:55 AM   #19
Marinausa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Just because something has not happened does not make fantasy.
Marinausa is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 03:02 AM   #20
Emunsesoxmete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
593
Senior Member
Default
Yeah those Afghans are savages who are incapable of having peace!
Emunsesoxmete is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity