General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Also...
This meant the end of a historical and monetary rule that, from the dawn of civilization, had made money a general medium of exchange and also a store of value. ![]() The United States — even when it was born in 1776 from a libertarian revolution against the arbitrary despotism of a British state that wanted to impose taxes without consultation... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
HalfLotus are you regularly following mises.org? I'll probably be at the Vienna
summit in September, let me know if you're there. WRT fiat money, it seems ugly from US perspective, but being from a smaller country, I have a bit different opinion on that than mainstream Austrian economists. You see, in our (small) countries, fiat money is democratic. It was not really imposed in a conspiracy. That is, people want it, even as they know all the pros and cons. Small countries are rather nimble and agile politically, compared to big USA. And there are approximately 200 of us small ones. Together we constitute a kind of a "natural experiment" wrt different monetary policies. If it were really beneficial to go on a gold standard, small countries could do it easily. But it doesn't make sense... for one, rising gold prices would kill our exports. We'd need to contract in fiat currencies anyway, like the Swiss are doing now paying workers in euros. If the US goes back to gold, by all means, let's all do it. But doing it alone would be suicide. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|