LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-30-2009, 08:45 PM   #21
gugamotina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
Oregon legalizes hemp cultivation

BY DANIEL TENCER
Published: June 30, 2009


Oregon’s House of Representatives voted Monday night to legalize the cultivation of hemp, becoming the sixth state to do so just this year.

Oregon’s Senate voted 27 to 2 in favor of the new law last week. Monday’s 46 to 11 House vote means that the measure will become law, barring an unlikely veto by Governor Ted Kulongoski.

The move is part of a rapidly growing nationwide trend to liberalize laws relating to marijuana. Hemp is a botanical cousin of marijuana, traditionally used to make clothing, rope and other durable fiber goods.

“Hemp is a versatile, environmentally-friendly crop that has not been grown in the U.S. for over fifty years because of a misguided and politicized interpretation of the nation’s drug laws by the Drug Enforcement Administration,” Vote Hemp President Eric Steenstra said in a statement.

“While a new bill in Congress, HR 1866, is a welcome step, the hemp industry is hopeful that President Obama’s administration will recognize hemp’s myriad benefits to farmers, businesses and the environment.”

According to Vote Hemp, this year Maine, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota and Vermont and ”all passed resolutions or memorials urging Congress to allow states to regulate hemp farming.”

California is at the forefront of the marijuana debate, with a movement growing to decriminalize marijuana for personal use in the state by 2010.

But in Oregon’s debate, politicians were careful to distinguish between hemp and weed, and to highlight the fact that the new law would allow farmers to cultivate hemp, not grow marijuana.

Some members of Oregon’s legislature displayed t-shirts reading “Senate Bill 676 is about rope, not dope.”

gugamotina is offline


Old 09-23-2009, 05:12 PM   #22
Bletlemof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
Timeline of Cannabis in America
Bletlemof is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 12:44 AM   #23
Grorointeri

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
No Reefer Madness?
Grorointeri is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 01:14 AM   #24
Promalada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default
Dwain Esper was just capitalizing on the public mood.
Promalada is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 03:46 AM   #25
erroxiainsona

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
Hemp: North Dakota Farmers Lose Appeal in 8th US Circuit

The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis last Tuesday upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss a lawsuit by a pair of North Dakota hemp farmers who argued they should be able to grow hemp crops without fear of federal prosecution.

Farmers Wayne Hauge and David Monson, who is also a Republican state representative, were awarded licenses from the state department of agriculture to grow hemp three years ago. They sought approval from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and after the DEA failed to respond, they filed suit in US District Court in Bismarck. There, US District Judge Daniel Hovland dismissed their suit.

The DEA considers hemp to be marijuana. It took a successful federal court challenge to force the DEA to continue to allow for hemp food products to be imported, but American farmers are still forced to stand on the sidelines and watch as their Canadian, Chinese, and European counterparts fill their wallets with profit from hemp sales.

"I guess the next step is we'll have to take it to Congress," Hauge told the Associated Press. "The fastest and easiest way to handle this would be for the president to order the Department of Justice to stand down on all actions against industrial hemp," he added, alluding wistfully to the department's announced policy shift on medical marijuana.

But Congress has other things on its plate, Monson told the AP. "With all the other things, hemp is not high on their priority list, and I can understand that," Monson said. "Somehow, we need to get enough states involved so Congress can take action on it," Monson said.

Adam Eidinger, a spokesman for the industry association VoteHemp, said he was disappointed, but not surprised, by the decision."The 8th Circuit is kind of conservative, so I can't say I'm totally surprised," he said.

No word yet on whether VoteHemp and the farmers will pursue the case any further.
erroxiainsona is offline


Old 12-30-2009, 09:04 AM   #26
sesWaipunsaws

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
"The 8th Circuit is kind of conservative, so I can't say I'm totally surprised,"
So, conservative=retarded in this case.
Because only an imbecile would have a problem with industrial hemp.
sesWaipunsaws is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 08:12 AM   #27
vTLWqa1l

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
528
Senior Member
Default
Who is funding the resistance.

This is not stupidity here. This smells of cash.
vTLWqa1l is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 10:00 AM   #28
mxzjxluwst

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
345
Senior Member
Default
You might look into these guys
mxzjxluwst is offline


Old 01-03-2010, 10:55 PM   #29
johnlohanmclee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
379
Senior Member
Default
I hope we can give them enough to........ weave something nice with.....
johnlohanmclee is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity