LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-29-2009, 07:47 PM   #1
secondmortgagek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default SUVS in the city
Why? i often wonder how stupid or retarded someone has to be to have a SUV in NYC. I just took a walk to get away from my desk here in chelsea. Large parking lot, full of SUVS. I'm sure the 4 wheel drive really helps in the 5 mph traffic moving down broadway.

they say the lottery is a tax on the stupid, but its time we really did tax stupid people. 2000 bucks a year tax if you drive a suv in nyc. theres an idea i can get behind
secondmortgagek is offline


Old 10-03-2009, 10:52 PM   #2
Pinkman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
593
Senior Member
Default
I think NYers should be permitted to throw anything within reach at any SUV stuck in traffic that blares it horn.

It's almost always an asshole with NJ plates sitting all alone behind the wheel frustrated that the city won't get out of his way.

People driving Hummers should just be pulled out of the vehicle amd beaten to death.
Pinkman is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 03:48 AM   #3
Forexampleee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
^ Hear, hear!!

Ditto for my city, which I had something to say about in another thread. Alas, the morons continue unabated and untaxed .
Forexampleee is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 06:29 AM   #4
doolarsva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Hey! New York, is a concrete jungle.
doolarsva is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 02:37 PM   #5
KahiroSamo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Ditto for my city, which I had something to say about in another thread. Alas, the morons continue unabated and untaxed .
Is there a special classification for an SUV (4WD, AWD) in Australia?

In the US post WWII to the 70s, SUVs were called off-road vehicles or four-by-fours. Jeep, International Harvester, Land Rover. Since they were actually taken off the road, they were spartan by modern SUV standards. No deep highly polished paint job that was going to get scratched; no plush interior that was going to get muddy.

In the 70s, American Motors got its Cherokee model designated as a light truck, which exempted it from compliance with the Clean Air Act. Gasoline was cheap in the US, so fuel economy wasn't an issue. The more sensible minivan was becoming the family car, but it was regarded as boring after the heady days of the muscle cars.

Thus was born the SUV, marketed as an exciting alternative to the minivan - go off into the wilderness, be a man. Women became the predominant users, because it was similar to the practical station wagon or minivan. But it was a truck, with (unnecessary) high ground clearance, and inefficient.

Today, SUVs are a mixed bag. High fuel prices have made the inefficiency of the truck design an issue, so many models are becoming more car-like. Crossovers. Lower to the ground, some don't even have AWD capability, and those that do use the same systems that are on ordinary cars. They are headed full circle back to the...

Station Wagon


But the label still has negative marketing impact, so they are called CUVs - Crossover Utility Vehicles.
KahiroSamo is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 05:00 PM   #6
mralabama

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
I can't remember the last time I saw an original station wagon here. They used to be everywhere.

As far as I know, 4WDs aren't subject to a special classification here...unfortunately.
mralabama is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity