General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
The 60-storey house for just one family
Last updated at 19:32pm on 1st June 2007 This 60-storey house is for just one family. India's richest man, Mukesh Ambani, is planning a palace in the heart of Mumbai with helipad, health club, hanging gardens and six floors of car parking. His wife, mother and three children will live there with him, looked after by 600 live-in staff. Construction has already started on what will eventually be a 175m tower and planners are aiming to complete it in September 2008. Earlier this year, Forbes rated Mr Ambani as the richest resident Indian with a net worth of US$20.1 billion. He came 14th in Forbes' 2007 worldwide rankings. Currently he is chairman of petroleum major Reliance Industries Ltd, India's largest private sector company. The building, already worth £500 million, could start a rush on skyscrapers. ![]() http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770 |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
How much did Versailes cost? ![]() I was talking about this one: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=2832627&page=1 |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Gotta love the arrogance of the Sun King. But still, I wouldn't dream of comparing something like Versailles - or any other chateau, castle, or palace - to a home built by one of today's rich. The difference between using the public's money and your own.
I think the most apt comparisons come from the Gilded Age mansions of two American businessmen - Hearst's Castle and Vanderbilt's Biltmore Estate. It's been estimated the former cost $4.7 million to build; around $10 million for the latter. They both originally covered tens of thousands of acres, and were the height of opulence (and technological sophistication) at their time. Even with inflation, I doubt either of them would come close to $1 billion in today's dollars. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Well the site of the house. You know the mansions of the American rich, with their golf courses and acres of manicured lawns. Just as disgusting and over time probably just as environmentally destructive as this. I think the most apt comparisons come from the Gilded Age mansions of two American businessmen - Hearst's Castle and Vanderbilt's Biltmore Estate. It's been estimated the former cost $4.7 million to build; around $10 million for the latter. They both originally covered tens of thousands of acres, and were the height of opulence (and technological sophistication) at their time. Even with inflation, I doubt either of them would come close to $1 billion in today's dollars. The latter may be chosen to hide the manor house, not flaunt it to the general public. The very expensive classic cars of the 30s went out of favor during the Depression, not because the rich couldn't afford them, but to avoid riling the less fortunate. A 60 storey building may by comparison seem more environmentally friendly, but we can't deny that many of today's parks and wilderness areas were once huge estates. Much of the 46,000 acre Harriman State Park was a gift from the 30,000 acre family estate. The NY Botanical Garden came from the estate of Pierre Lorillard. Since they were more interested in horseback riding than lawns, they never cleared the trees, so we now have one of the oldest forest stands in New York. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|