General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
It caters to dumb people that think that it is scientifically rigorous when really it is just reality TV in disguise. Hence the audience that it attracts. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
You're all right, most episodes have at least one thing that's obviously a misinterpretation of either the 'legend' being investigated, or poorly implimented test logic.
I still watch it a lot, though, as it's certainly entertaining - I like explosions and one of my favourites were the matchhead explosions and the coffee whitener explosions. Oh, and the 'snowplough' mounted on the rocket sled - I certainly didn't expect that to work so well! |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
They really dropped the ball on this one. Thankfully no one was killed or injured. Hopefully in the future they give some serious thought to where they try something like this again.
It caters to dumb people that think that it is scientifically rigorous when really it is just reality TV in disguise. Hence the audience that it attracts. But sure, go ahead and turn your nose up at Mythbusters and the fans you obviously consider to be the lowest common denominator. [rolleyes] |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
I would say that almost all of their problems don't actually need to be tested in the manner that they do...but watching a team of scientists or engineers while they write on a white board, discussing scientific theory and working through equations and derivations wouldn't be too interesting to watch. I'm an Engineer, and even I wouldn't want to watch that after a day at work.
![]() Mythbusters is a show meant to entertain with it's over the top "experiments" while throwing in a little science here and there for good measure. If you want something a bit more scientific or academic, I would recommend that you sign up for a class or two at your local community college, instead of watching TV. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
I don't believe anyone thinks Mythbusters encourage rigor. What they do however, is encourage people to experiment, and not take something for granted. Are their experiments legitimate science? Of course not, it's entertainment. But rigor can wait for the classroom. These guys are getting my son, and probably many more kids, more interested in learning about science than any lesson in rigor ever will. This is a weird concept: Myths are spread through generations to quickly answer questions and replace real science. Nearly everything that my father believes in a myth, but he is 60 and grew up in a time were there was much less availability of science. Now, the show claims to bust myths (which naturally target an older generation) yet caters to children that probably have no idea what the hell myth they are talking about. They should just call it the "Silly Science show". |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
It's not a made up story. It's real life, hence reality. It's not like those shows you listed, but it is reality TV. Reality TV is usually more a long the lines of just go with it with no retakes or scripts, for the most part. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|