General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
It's a right horror show: http://www.google.com/images?q=guidette
I thought the *****y(est) girl was alright but it's been a while I seen it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Taco Bell Sexy?
![]() I googled the cast and got this picture: ![]() yikes. Yeah. They're not attractive, especially not television attractive. Realistically, if you knew maybe one or two in real life, you'd probably say she's fairly attractive but not enough to be on television. On top of that, I think half the cast isn't even Italian. I think that Snooki chick is Hispanic. Oh and it's hilarious how like every country in the world has their own version of this show. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
The girls don't look quite so rancid, IMO. Well, not the two on either end. Not gorgeous or anything, but not Lovecraftian like the Jersey Shore pic. But the guys look approximately equal in douchebaggery. ![]() :vomit: |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Oh FFS you're such a bunch of ****ing women, or liars, or having their wives look over their shoulders as they type, or something. Can someone (especially Elok) please at least concede that there's a HUGE difference between A) "she has an extremely annoying personality and lifestyle that make me averse to hanging out with her on a regular basis" and B) "I would NOT **** the everloving **** out of [any one of those JS guidettes'] tight, athletic body 40 ways from sundown were it splayed before me on a silver platter with no questions asked, even if I hypothetically had the consolation of being neuralyzed such that I had no idea who she was plus the assurance that she would not speak a single word all night (except perhaps talking dirty a little bit at peak moments and making occasional clever references to Lovecraft, but certainly nothing about who she is or what her personality is like or what she does in her spare time)." We really need to parse out that important distinction before proceeding further. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Plus "low standards" to most people means putting up with saddlebags, wrinkles, trucked-out facial structures, generally poor hygiene, and the like. A tight, athletic body plus sharply defined, feminine faces (with the exception of Snooky, obviously put a bag over that butterface) is the very definition of high standards looking at the full spectrum of women that are out there and sexually active. It's just the supra-body information we happen to have about the obnoxious personalities, stupidity, and overall skankiness of guidettes that makes us fail to see what would - absent that information and perhaps with its replacement by some degree of normalcy - be half-assed decent pieces of ass.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
The remainder looks ****able, yes? Secondly, what point is it saying the remainder looks ****able? Couldn't you do that to any woman on the planet if you censored enough of her? Thirdly, it's okay that you have low standards, Darius. You'll be making that good attorney money soon though so you can afford to bump up your standards soon. Fourthly, I already said that if you knew any of these women, you would consider them fairly attractive, but they're not television attractive. Fifthly, being fairly attractive does not equal 'oh my god, you make me wanna umpf umpf' ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|