General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
This goes far beyond video games. You lack vision. The stuff coming out of hacks for Kinect is more interesting than the official stuff at the moment. I really think Microsoft should embrace the OpenSource community, release open source drivers. They could sell loads, and maintain their position firmly at the forefront of this new technology. There are loads of commercial applications which they can sell software or licences for, even if they can't make a profit on the hardware. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
Kinect has a lot of potential.
What I would like most, is to see FPSs use it for headtracking which would create great 3D experience without the need of special glasses or displays. Unfortunately it's going to be from the perspective of one person only, but that would be more than enough. Also this will be very easy to implement. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Ah, so when Nintendo does motion capture it is a gimmick. When Microsoft does it, it is the wave of the future...
30 Years Ago.... Asher - Pssh, Apple is a joke company. Their "mouse" is just a silly gimmick. Any serious users only need dos. Look at their sales, this mouse thing is just a fad, just you wait. Later... Asher - Microsoft has revolutionized computing, Windows is amazing! |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Kinect has a lot of potential. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
Asher is right.
Nintendo achieved such huge sales by targeting non-traditional gamers as their markets. I don't think anyone would disagree that they did that brilliantly well. They marketed it really brilliantly and the concept of including a game with the console, and the choice of that game was inspired. It was easy to play, anyone from 5 to 85 could play it, and they could play competitively against each other. It created a shared experience. Virtually everyone who's ever played a Wii has played Wii Sports. As time has gone on many of those new gamers either lost interest either because the novelty wore off or because the software library for the Wii has been so woefully average (aside from a few really great games), or they moved onto more demanding consoles. But Nintendo have NEVER been a technology pioneering company. They've always been brilliant at finding new ways to use existing technology for gaming once it was established and became cheap. eg. the old LCD game and watch games, came about after the digital watches had been around for years. The Wii was absolutely the same. There are many interviews with nintendo execs explaining how they didn't want to compete on technology with PS3 or 360 but to come in at a lower price point. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|