Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
rollin, |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
hey, thats great, would certainly look into that and where, when etc.. to see if i can get to go to it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
rollin, |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
I won't comment on the why, JB covered that very well. I would question the concept of your gaps. I found that with the gaps that GI irons now make, I had to rethink the loft of my wedges as well as the rest of the bag. I would suggest that if you are rethinking your irons, you cannot leave out the change in gaps of your wedges as well. Almost all irons have strengthen lofts, not just GI irons. Many PW five years ago were 48 or 49; today, it is rare to see one under 46. All this to say, that if you are updating your bag mix, you will have the issues you bring up, unless you look at the entire bag. Just my opinion.
Great question, btw, this is a great topic and relevant as we all try out the new stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
I won't comment on the why, JB covered that very well. I would question the concept of your gaps. I found that with the gaps that GI irons now make, I had to rethink the loft of my wedges as well as the rest of the bag. I would suggest that if you are rethinking your irons, you cannot leave out the change in gaps of your wedges as well. Almost all irons have strengthen lofts, not just GI irons. Many PW five years ago were 48 or 49; today, it is rare to see one under 46. All this to say, that if you are updating your bag mix, you will have the issues you bring up, unless you look at the entire bag. Just my opinion. I think I most probably would go 4 through PW and add another wedge vs my current 3-PW, AW, SW. Basically move one club down the scale and then fill the inside PW gap. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
The point is that if/when i get new clubs, they will be some sort of G.I. clubs which now seem to most all be designed with the lower lofts. Why do i have to hit my PW more than the 130 I currently do? Will I not then also be comming into a green at a lower angle causing more roll we usually don't want? Then what also do I do between my PW and AW? I already have a big gap between my two existing clubs now. If a new lower lofted PW for me ends up being from 140, then anytime I may be at about the 120 to 130 mark, I'll have to swing easy, choke up, or alter my PW swing to not hit it as far. Just doesn't seem like any advantages to this newer low lofted irons situation for me. They seem to assume all high handicappers are all looking for distance but that is not the case at all. I do nead G.I. irons due to the forgiveness with my inconsistant swings but why be forced to legnthen my shots? And why would the fitter even have recommended that too me? Or perhaps he just going with the times and knows most new irons sre being made this way now. No matter what the lofting of your new set of irons has, you will not maintain perfect gaps to your wedges. Find a setup that you like and make adjustments to create the gaps you need. Be sure to go on real world gaps versus just lofts. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
I play with a set of juiced loft irons and its really not too tough to transition. Simply put, you just figure that your 8i is the equivalent to your 7i. So instead of thinking that your PW has more rollout, think that your new sets AW will be just about the same as your old PW and move forward. There is a reason that many of these newer sets don't sell many 3i, people see that their new 4i is the equivalent to their old 3i and use the space to close the gap from iron set to wedges. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 11 (0 members and 11 guests) | |
|