Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I thought this was an interesting statistic from the USGA. Hope it formants: First column:your handicap, second column: % of total scores entered and third column:% of golfers with your handicap
USGA Men Hdcp Idx Percent of Total Cumulative +1 or better 0.13% 0.13% 0 0.55% 0.68% 1 0.57% 1.25% 2 0.85% 2.10% 3 1.15% 3.25% 4 1.56% 4.81% 5 2.02% 6.83% 6 2.56% 9.39% 7 3.17% 12.56% 8 3.68% 16.24% 9 4.20% 20.44% 10 4.66% 25.10% 11 5.02% 30.12% 12 5.41% 35.53% 13 5.58% 41.11% 14 5.67% 46.78% 15 5.54% 52.32% 16 5.36% 57.69% 17 5.02% 62.71% 18 4.64% 67.35% 19 4.23% 71.57% 20 3.88% 75.45% 21 3.46% 78.91% 22 3.12% 82.03% 23 2.78% 84.81% 24 2.44% 87.25% 25 2.11% 89.36% 26 1.81% 91.17% 27 1.54% 92.71% 28 1.30% 94.01% 29 1.10% 95.12% 30 0.91% 96.03% 31 0.75% 96.78% 32 0.61% 97.39% 33 0.51% 97.91% 34 0.42% 98.32% 35 0.34% 98.66% 36+ 1.34% 100.00% |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
The women's: (same columns as above)
USGA Hdcp Idx Percent of Total Cumulative +1 or better 0.03% 0.03% 0 0.05% 0.08% 1 0.05% 0.13% 2 0.08% 0.21% 3 0.10% 0.31% 4 0.15% 0.46% 5 0.18% 0.64% 6 0.24% 0.87% 7 0.31% 1.18% 8 0.40% 1.58% 9 0.51% 2.09% 10 0.61% 2.70% 11 0.76% 3.46% 12 0.97% 4.43% 13 1.22% 5.65% 14 1.41% 7.06% 15 1.71% 8.77% 16 1.92% 10.69% 17 2.20% 12.89% 18 2.38% 15.27% 19 2.55% 17.82% 20 2.76% 20.58% 21 3.06% 23.64% 22 3.40% 27.03% 23 3.67% 30.70% 24 3.87% 34.57% 25 3.98% 38.55% 26 4.08% 42.63% 27 4.09% 46.73% 28 4.15% 50.87% 29 4.03% 54.91% 30 3.98% 58.89% 31 3.83% 62.71% 32 3.74% 66.46% 33 3.54% 70.00% 34 3.32% 73.31% 35 3.11% 76.43% 36 2.85% 79.28% 37 2.60% 81.88% 38 2.30% 84.18% 39 1.98% 86.16% 40+ 13.84% 100.00% |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Soxy-
I'm a little confused (no surprise there, huh?) The second column is % of people with that exact index, and the third column is % of people with that index or better? For example: 10 4.66% 25.10% For a 10 index, 4.66% of the total number of people with official USGA handicap indexes have an index of 10 (presumably, 10.00 to 10.99), and 25.10% of the total number of people with an index have an index of 10 or better? I find it interesting that only 1.36% of men report the maximum index (36+) while 13.84% of women report having the maximum index (40+). Methinks there are a lot of men with vanity handicaps. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
For a 10 index, 4.66% of the total number of people with official USGA handicap indexes have an index of 10 (presumably, 10.00 to 10.99), and 25.10% of the total number of people with an index have an index of 10 or better? I find it interesting that only 1.36% of men report the maximum index (36+) while 13.84% of women report having the maximum index (40+). Methinks there are a lot of men with vanity handicaps. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Keep in mind this is of course the percentage of golfers who have registered for a handicap. I think it is safe to assume that a fair amount of higher handicap golfers have not registered with the USGA. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
I think it is safe to assume that a fair amount of higher handicap golfers have not registered with the USGA. For the record, I don't have an official handicap. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Bulldog:
Start here: www.oobgolf.com, or one of several other handicap tracking sites that have been discussed on THP. You can't just go off your average. if you regularly play really hard courses, your handicap will be way lower than your average while if you play really easy courses, your handicap will be higher than your average. (For example, you have a guy who averages 93 at Bethpage Black and someone who averages 93 on the easiest course in the country. Who is going to have a better handicap?) |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Thanks, Yeah have a couple here that are short & Tex Conover is 6863 yds (white) & 7361 (blues). Handicap thread |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Yes, I would say so. Otherwise, over 90% break 100 semi regularly! Riiiight! I don't know the correct stats, but if everyone were honest I would guess it's closer to 50%. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|