[c-cialis]

To All: Moodanambikai means for eg: Tideing a coconut at a Hunman Temple will bring Wealth,sons or dats marriage willfix and everybody rushing towards that particular temple and tide coconuts is called Moodanambikai, why a particular temple why not other Maruthi temps. So Moodanambikai is a social enemy and that is the todays Fortune for so many people to earn for their food. S.R.K.

[Jackson]

Dear TBS, trust me,I know you will come back..

Cos I had a strong 'TRUE FAITH, not "moodanambikkai -BLIND FAITH' that some day you will come back to this forum, inspite of me not having any direct influence/contact with you..

Cos I know, with my reasoning & Logic that you are a learned person,who love to seek/share knowledge, and hence you wont exit just like that..

Also with my reasoning, I know,you a patriotic person, will not take strange decisions, just because of some groupism kinds and for sure I know you wont support unethical posts of someone..

Also I had a logic, that Good people will always get attracted to good forums, come what the deviations happened, and for sure you will make a comback...

Just to tried to explain "Faith Vs Blind faith', with our own analogy and live instance.. Shri.TBS,Welcome Back... Im sure all our forum member will join me in welcoming you... This forum also needs patriotic person like you too..


Btw, I couldnt comprehend your post.. Could you pls elaborate if, in such a way, that my small brain understand easily..Thanks in advance.

Respected spr
Thank you very much.........infact i visit this forum daily...may be
i can say...im addicted to this forum...no doubt...i read daily
all topics regularly...i may not be direct involve..i learn many
things here...well about my post...in advaitham...sri bhagavatpadal
explains the form of brahman is called anirvacahniyam...this
is a bigbang theory in vedanta....means inexplainable form
of brahman..neti neti is upanishadic word..means this is not,
this is not....

regards

[NvrNoNowX]

.

By the way, having been trained in Physics, I tend to believe that this seminal question can ever be answered by science. It is about closed systems and the observer as part of that system.

So, then, anything within the realm of God is not 'Mooda' Nambikkai.

Regards,
KRS

Shri.KRS, need some help...

Whats your outlook on this mathematical proof of existence of God... Couldnt understand it much,cos severe memory loss,and lost touch with Descates/Set theory..

The interesting thing is , it disproves Russel..
http://kuday-eng.bloggum.com/post/Ma...ce-Of-God.html

[hwood]

Dear sapr333,

Set theory in mathematics is controversial - because it touches the realm of non computational mathematics. Again it operates on the defined logic.

The paradoxes arose, from what I understand out of the underlying assumptions of the construct of the theory. I am not competent enough to say whether the way the existence of God is defined in the attachment is correct or wrong, based on the foundations of set theory.

However, as a layman it seems to me that the existence of God is proved from the existence of humans over the progression of time. This, I suppose assumes that all that exist and not exist belong to a super set G.

I don't see how the 'existence' of God is proved this way. Seems to me that the author only proves that a set can exist which consists everything in the universe, whether it is well defined or not.

Regards,
KRS

Shri.KRS, need some help...

Whats your outlook on this mathematical proof of existence of God... Couldnt understand it much,cos severe memory loss,and lost touch with Descates/Set theory..

The interesting thing is , it disproves Russel..
http://kuday-eng.bloggum.com/post/Ma...ce-Of-God.html

[Thorwaywhobia]

Even Sakunam Pakkarathu may be termed mooda namikai,What about Rahu Kalam?

[DumbNelmcrece]

Even Sakunam Pakkarathu may be termed mooda namikai,What about Rahu Kalam?

I say we have lost the art of divining through 'sakuman', and hence, all such interpretations seem 'moodam' to us!