[ONLINEPHARMACYCHEAPILLS]

Hosni Mubarak betrayed the legacy of Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_fZG6_SDus

[appleiphoneees]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir0df...eature=related

[PebydataFeents]

Well what kind of legacy is positive in the Arabic nationalism and socialism expounded by [Abd al-]Nasir and Sadat?...

(I haven't watched the video..).

[kertUtire]

Well what kind of legacy is positive in the Arabic nationalism and socialism expounded by [Abd al-]Nasir and Sadat?...

(I haven't watched the video..).

Both Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat were presidents for the people they worked very hard to better the situation for their people i am personally against secularism and it's ideologies but compared to Mubarak both were much better.

[yasmin]

Both Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat were presidents for the people they worked very hard to better the situation for their people i am personally against secularism and it's ideologies but compared to Mubarak both were much better.

al-Salamu 'Aleykum,

I was once a Nassrist, I left this matter and I tell you this:

1- Mubarak is a Zionist employee.

2- Sadat was a traitor and he hunted down the Naserists such as Hassanyn Haikal and Ibrahim Koleilat.

3- Gamal 'Abdul-Nasser was a secular dictator and the only good thing he did was fight Israel and try to unify the 'Arabs, that however is to be expected from any leader we elect, he failed in both.

[htDgExh8]

Both Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat were presidents for the people they worked very hard to better the situation for their people i am personally against secularism and it's ideologies but compared to Mubarak both were much better.

Both adhered to kufr ideologies to they are about on the same level in my eyes.

[SarSerceSaice]

Both adhered to kufr ideologies to they are about on the same level in my eyes.

Wich makes them?

[Foucceedo]

Wich makes them?

Arab Nationalist ideology is an ideology of kufr and they were tawagheet.

[JulieSmithXIV]

Arab Nationalist ideology is an ideology of kufr and they were tawagheet.

Interesting i am against Nationalism but what exactly makes them kuffar as you claim now i am referring to Anwar Sadat rahimahullah and Abdel Nasser.

[spamkillerf]

Interesting i am against Nationalism but what exactly makes them kuffar as you claim now i am referring to Anwar Sadat rahimahullah and Abdel Nasser.

Being in support of kufr does not automatically make one a kafir.

[boizzones]

Being in support of kufr does not automatically make one a kafir.

I am interested in the postion of the ulema regarding president Sadat and Abdel Nasser but one of the members here declared kufr on these two individuals and i am interested in his proof.

[Atmotteenrift]

sadat and abdul nasser promoters of ideologies at odds with islam.

[Qesomud]

Interesting i am against Nationalism but what exactly makes them kuffar as you claim now i am referring to Anwar Sadat rahimahullah and Abdel Nasser.

Again, arab nationalist ideology is an ideology of kufr, and they were tawagheet. Look at the tafseer of Surah al-Ma'idah and Surah an-Nisaa', ayahs 33 and 60 respectively.

Read Zainab al-Ghazali's memoirs of her time in Nasser's (lanatullah) prisons, where dogs were sicced on her, she was tortured and beaten, et cetera.

Anwar Sadat (lanatullah) was another taghoot and he spent much time murdering people and torturing and imprisoning them for calling for the Islamic Shari'a to be implemented, and then he (lanatullah) made peace with the Zionist Entity- how can you disrespect such a beautiful phrase as (rahimullah)- a phrase asking for Allah's mercy on the deceased, by polluting it with Anwar Sadat's vile name?

I would be extremely surprised if any members here disagreed with me on these points concerning those two disgusting men.

As for Nasser's other efforts, they were all failures! He was a massive, vile failure with a lot of flashy rhetoric and a handsome face.

[Leczyslaw]

Again, arab nationalist ideology is an ideology of kufr, and they were tawagheet. Look at the tafseer of Surah al-Ma'idah and Surah an-Nisaa', ayahs 33 and 60 respectively.

Read Zainab al-Ghazali's memoirs of her time in Nasser's (lanatullah) prisons, where dogs were sicced on her, she was tortured and beaten, et cetera.

Anwar Sadat (lanatullah) was another taghoot and he spent much time murdering people and torturing and imprisoning them for calling for the Islamic Shari'a to be implemented, and then he (lanatullah) made peace with the Zionist Entity- how can you disrespect such a beautiful phrase as (rahimullah)- a phrase asking for Allah's mercy on the deceased, by polluting it with Anwar Sadat's vile name?

I would be extremely surprised if any members here disagreed with me on these points concerning those two disgusting men.

As for Nasser's other efforts, they were all failures! He was a massive, vile failure with a lot of flashy rhetoric and a handsome face.

Anwar Sadat wasn't against the Ikhwan that's for sure he said and even wrote that he admired Sh Hassan al Banna and even collaborated with him as for Gamal Abdel Nasser again i disagree with Nationalism and Socialism but on what grounds can you declare kufr upon them it's well known that in Sadat's days the role of the Sharia became more important and Sadat was known to be a practicing Muslim now i am not blindly following individuals but i am not hasty with takfeer either and i cant remember any scholar from Al Azhar declaring takfeer on Sadat or Abdel Nasser or any scholar in the Islamic world i heard that Shaykh Kishk criticized both of them but takfeer i dont know but if you can proof me wrong go ahead.

[Adiamant]

Anwar Sadat wasn't against the Ikhwan that's for sure he said and even wrote that he admired Sh Hassan al Banna and even collaborated with him as for Gamal Abdel Nasser again i disagree with Nationalism and Socialism but on what grounds can you declare kufr upon them it's well known that in Sadat's days the role of the Sharia became more important and Sadat was known to be a practicing Muslim now i am not blindly following individuals but i am not hasty with takfeer either and i cant remember any scholar from Al Azhar declaring takfeer on Sadat or Abdel Nasser or any scholar in the Islamic world i heard that Shaykh Kishk criticized both of them but takfeer i dont know but if you can proof me wrong go ahead.

This is the state we are in, it is 'being hasty with takfeer' to declare takfeer on Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat!

Read something about Tawheed! Allahu musta'an.

I say, I spit on him, I spit on Anwar al-Sadat, May Allah cause the screams of those they murdered whose only 'crime' was calling for the Shari'a to echo in their ears, mingled with the happy laughter of the martyrs, to follow them into the depths of the Blazing Fire.

[Knillagrarp]

Anwar Sadat wasn't against the Ikhwan that's for sure he said and even wrote that he admired Sh Hassan al Banna and even collaborated with him as for Gamal Abdel Nasser again i disagree with Nationalism and Socialism but on what grounds can you declare kufr upon them it's well known that in Sadat's days the role of the Sharia became more important and Sadat was known to be a practicing Muslim now i am not blindly following individuals but i am not hasty with takfeer either and i cant remember any scholar from Al Azhar declaring takfeer on Sadat or Abdel Nasser or any scholar in the Islamic world i heard that Shaykh Kishk criticized both of them but takfeer i dont know but if you can proof me wrong go ahead.

bro,you have to read zainab al ghazali's heart wrenching memoir of her ordeal while in prison.. http://www.kalamullah.com/Books/Retu...%20Pharaoh.pdf

[aideriimibion]

This is an example of the kind of legacy someone was trying to uphold here:

Jews were victorious in that war,not because of arms....but because of our own weaknesses.

The great champion of Arab cause Nasir,was proudly proclaiming himself to be the inheritor of Pharaoh,while the Jews soldiers were reciting the old testament even in their trenches when free of fighting.Nasir,s full attention was to win the war through 'Soath al Arab',while the Jews were actively contemplating how to destroy the whole Arab air Force in one single strike.The motivating force behind Arabs was 'Arab Nationalism' (not Islam),for Jews it was a matter of survival of their faith,race and community.

Iqbal has very beautifully stated:

[I]"Muhammade Arabi se he Alame Arabi"

The Arab world exists because of their spiritual and emotional connection with Muhammade Arab,sallaho alai he wa sallam.

How easily this lesson was forgotten by the then Arab leaders !

Let me quote,what was written,on the death of Nasir,in 'Aljamhooria',the date Octor 1st 1970.

"The prophet of this new age has passed away.Jamal Nasir died on the same day of the year,when Tajalli of 'Meraj' was granted to Muhammad Rasoolullah saas,and He (Nasir) was invited to sidrat ul muntaha,to mend his broken heart,just like it was done for Prophet Muhammad Saas.Nasir has not died,he is on a journey to the skies like the Prophets and Quddisi,s"

"O,Jamal Abdul Nasir...O,Prophet of Arab nationalism,O,Prophet of Freedom,your name and your body reached the skies on the blessed night of 'Meraj'...you met Quddosi,s,and you became a part of those blessed souls who create life in the skies and on earth"

"O,The one,the like of whom this world has never seen,steadfast in front of problems,and mending them whenever and in whatever way he wanted"

"New Kalima La ilaha Illallah-Nasir Habib ul ah.Our ancestors used to sing your songs,you were like a dream to them,they waited for 4000 years for you,till you came"

These were just a few glimpses of the personality cult culture,in which Arabs were illogically but emotionally involved,while the Jews were preparing for the war with a cool mind.

Now let us see a few examples of how,in the emotional turmoil of Nationalism,the Arabs rebelled against Islam and the Nabuwwat of Muhammad sallaho alai he wa sallam.:

The Arab nation asked for help from Ilah,looked into the old traditions of Islam and Christinity,tried to take some comfort from the capitalist system,but to no avail...then the Arab nation took heart,raised his head and fixed his eyes on the newly born 'communist Arab individual'.

"The traditions which has made an Arab young man as a useless guy,who bows his head before taqqdeer,and who can only recite La bola wa la quasars ill a billah"

"The creation of a new Arab society demands the creation of a new Arab communist individual,who believes that ALLAH,RELIGION,CAPITALISM...in short all those traditions which ruled the Arabs,are to be put as Mummies in history museum".

Much more can be written,but I think these are sufficient reasons for an Arab Muslim nation to be put to the worst kind of defeat,not by the hands of Jews....but by our own hands,as we had gone faraway from our life source ie ISLAM