LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-03-2009, 05:22 PM   #1
DJElizardo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
456
Senior Member
Default 2 rakats before Maghrib? Where does this come from?
As-Salamu Alaikum,

As far as I have ever learned there are no rakats before the fard of Maghrib. I have been on safari lately, a several masjids which I have visited had numerous individuals preforming two rakats after the Maghrib Azan was called. It must be something outside the Ahl Sunna wa Jaamat.
DJElizardo is offline


Old 06-03-2009, 05:32 PM   #2
Cnbaapuy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...hlight=maghrib
Cnbaapuy is offline


Old 06-03-2009, 05:32 PM   #3
muBXvWIC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
As-Salamu Alaikum,

As far as I have ever learned there are no rakats before the fard of Maghrib. I have been on safari lately, a several masjids which I have visited had numerous individuals preforming two rakats after the Maghrib Azan was called. It must be something outside the Ahl Sunna wa Jaamat.
Walikum-us-salam.

It is makrooh (disliked) to pray 2 rakats before the Maghrib salah according to the ahnaaf. That's why it is also disliked to have a long gap between the Maghrib azaan and salah, in which a person can offer 2 rakats.

However the salafi brothers do offer these 2 rakats, and we differ with them on this issue.
muBXvWIC is offline


Old 06-03-2009, 05:51 PM   #4
Unoloknovagog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default


I heard that Sahabah prayed these Rakatain before Maghrib, but Rasulullah did not. And the latter never rebuked them for praying them either. Is this correct?
Unoloknovagog is offline


Old 06-03-2009, 05:54 PM   #5
encumeterz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default

This is done by people from other madhhahib, like the maalikies, so it is from ahlus sunnah.
This is bound to happen when muslims from all over the world meet each other, the wisdom would be not to be too suspicious at every single difference.
encumeterz is offline


Old 06-04-2009, 12:53 PM   #6
FjFHQLJQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default


I heard that Sahabah prayed these Rakatain before Maghrib, but Rasulullah did not. And the latter never rebuked them for praying them either. Is this correct?
Walikum-us-salam.

In the early era, the Sahaabah used to read this Nafl Salaah, but during the latter time this was completely left out.
FjFHQLJQ is offline


Old 07-01-2012, 03:03 AM   #7
JosephEL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Volume 2, Book 21, Number 277:
Narrated 'Abdullah Al-Muzni:

The Prophet said, "Pray before the Maghrib (compulsory) prayer." He (said it thrice) and in the third time, he said, "Whoever wants to offer it can do so." He said so because he did not like the people to take it as a tradition.

Volume 2, Book 21, Number 278:
Narrated Marthad bin 'Abdullah Al-Yazani:

I went to 'Uqba bin 'Amir Al-Juhani and said, "Is it not surprising that Abi Tamim offers two Rakat before the Maghrib prayer?" 'Uqba said, "We used to do so in the life-time of Allah's Apostle." I asked him, "What prevents you from offering it now?" He replied, "Business."
JosephEL is offline


Old 07-01-2012, 05:20 AM   #8
br`lorance

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default

This is done by people from other madhhahib, like the maalikies, so it is from ahlus sunnah.
This is bound to happen when muslims from all over the world meet each other, the wisdom would be not to be too suspicious at every single difference.
It is not the mashhur madhhab of the Malikis as stated in their works.
br`lorance is offline


Old 07-01-2012, 05:35 AM   #9
Spalax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default

There is no salat during sunset and sunrise.
The two rakat performed may be after Maghrib adhan are perhaps could be according to the other school of Jurisprudance. But the lamadhabist couldn't careless and would like to show their superiorty by offering salaat.

Allahualam
Was your second sentence really necessary ?
You make a great remark when stating that it could be according to another madhhab (and indeed it is). But why add this on the lamadhabist ?
We must try to avoid useless comments on each groups...it's helping none of us.

wAllâhu A'lam.
Spalax is offline


Old 07-01-2012, 05:35 AM   #10
Si8jy8HN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
It is not the mashhur madhhab of the Malikis as stated in their works.

I cannot debate on it except to state what I see.
Si8jy8HN is offline


Old 07-01-2012, 06:25 AM   #11
mirex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
It is not the mashhur madhhab of the Malikis as stated in their works.
But this is the "Asahh" (correct opinion) in the Shafi'i School, that it is Mustahabb.

Check Sharh Muslim of al-Nawawi.

Wallahu A'lam.
mirex is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:38 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity