[drgshmcm]

The Saudi leader rebelled against the khalifah after giving his allegiance to him. This indicates that they were treacherous and untrustworthy. The Grand Mufti of the Osmanli Khalifah declared him to be a rebel and a murtad to be executed, they did not even allow him to pray his 2 raka nawafil.

What will you say if a saudi said this to you :
"Of course, it must be remembered that the history written by those who oppose the da'wa of the Shakh cannot be trusted for its authenticity, they wanted to [put here what ever reasons he could give you]... and to achieve this they have to exagerate some mistakes which the Shaykh or his followers may have made. Of course by doing this, they had to obtain a scholarly opinion to sustain them and so they presetend distorted facts or quotes to scholars so that they call the Shaykh and his followers as deviant."

My point is just that if it must be remembered that the Saudis may have shortcomings in relating what happened during this era, the same can and must be said for those who opposed them.

[Yswxomvy]

Regardless of the differences - we will have to give Shaykh Muhammad ibn al-Wahhaab (ra) this - he was one of the revivers of the sunnah who eradicated bid'ah to a great extent in the Arab peninsula mashaAllah.

If one reads that extract - one will be shocked at the level of degeneration in the Arab society at his time.

[Zebrabitch]

WAHHABI FABRICATED MYTH ON THE HISTORY OF*ARABIA
http://hornofsatan.wordpress.com/201...ory-of-arabia/