[draigenia]

Assalamu alaikum. Yesterday i was present in a program viz. TEHREEK E RESHMI RUMAAL(SHEIKH UL HIND) KE SAU SAAL(SILKEN KERCHIEF MOVEMENT). the bayaan was presented by maulana hakeemuddeen qami sahab secrty jamiatul uluma hind. He told in brief about this tehreek. But I DIDN'T GET WHY SHIEKHUL HIND (RA) WAS ARRESTED IN MAKKAH MUKARAMMAH. he also told there was bombardment in madeena munawwara at that time. Why this happened. Please clarify my doubts specially bro maripat.

[UrUROFlS]

Assalamu alaikum. Yesterday i was present in a program viz. TEHREEK E RESHMI RUMAAL(SHEIKH UL HIND) KE SAU SAAL(SILKEN KERCHIEF MOVEMENT). the bayaan was presented by maulana hakeemuddeen qami sahab secrty jamiatul uluma hind. He told in brief about this tehreek. But I DIDN'T GET WHY SHIEKHUL HIND (RA) WAS ARRESTED IN MAKKAH MUKARAMMAH. he also told there was bombardment in madeena munawwara at that time. Why this happened. Please clarify my doubts specially bro maripat.

To my cursory knowledge Shaikh-ul-Hind (RA) was not arrested in Haram Shareef but while returning and the reason was of course the said movement his efforts to establish the Islamic state. I think Madinah bombardment might be the one when Shiias tried to take over. But it will be better to read the book called Reshmi Rumaal Tehreek. We have to know these things and we have to communicate them. That is why I have a thread called Translate, Translate here at SF. My apology that I can not provide more details at the moment.

[draigenia]

Is there any hand of saud family in arrest of sheik ul hind(ra).

[UrUROFlS]

Is there any hand of saud family in arrest of sheik ul hind(ra).

I would not know one way or other.
We got to read the relevant literature.

Can you find time to translate this - it is relevant.

I did not know that we have such clear statements from Dar-ul-Uloom in present times.

[Biassasecumma]

Is there any hand of saud family in arrest of sheik ul hind(ra).

The Saud Family were to arrive at the scene after nearly 10 years from this incident. Shaikh ul Hind left for Hijaz in 1914 with the intent to garner support from the Turks, who ruled over the Hijaz at that time. He then intended to reach Istanbul, The Dar ul Khilafah for the same. But He was turned over to the British by the Sharif of Makkah who had formed an Alliance with the British to dismantle the Khilafah.

[NKUDirectory]

I would not know one way or other.
We got to read the relevant literature.

Can you find time to translate this - it is relevant.

I did not know that we have such clear statements from Dar-ul-Uloom in present times.

i am listening to it.
now i know exactly why secularism is the best option for muslims in india and the worst for muslims in pakistan.

[UrUROFlS]

i am listening to it.
now i know exactly why secularism is the best option for muslims in india and the worst for muslims in pakistan.

I can not tell you how happy I am akhi.
Ground beneath my feet moves completely when I perceive the situation we have on - the ground.
At the time of partition it was impossible to move all Muslims to Pakistan - we are human and we have limitations. How can you transport Muslims from Kerala and Tamilnadu to either east or west Pakistan?
One has to think of the situation in view of the fact that everybody in the train get murdered when moving from Punjab to Punjab and then you have to imagine the movement from south India to east or west Pakistan. You know in one of recent LA Times or Washington Post articles it was leaked the people around Obama are usually at a loss because of one of his habits. He just takes decisions without thinking about the difficulties of its physical implementations. Now partition stands physically implemented. The next problem is to design an interface between Muslims and the rest of India - mainly Hindus. A smooth interface will be desirable. High tension interface is absolutely suicidal for the Muslims of India. I'll talk about these things later, IA, but I'll add one curious comment from You Tube. Brother uploading Jihadi Taranas made a statement a few years ago that Indian Mullah Arshad Madani is making noise about living peacefully with Hindus. For me Hazrat Madani (DB), statement was completely sane it is pragmatism and it is real politik.
Just to cover the whole spectrum I did not like his snubbing of Pervez Musharraf during latter's India visit. There has to be a middle way in this case also. (Of course no one remains a Musharraf fan by now.)

[Trientoriciom]

I can not tell you how happy I am akhi.
Ground beneath my feet moves completely when I perceive the situation we have on - the ground.
At the time of partition it was impossible to move all Muslims to Pakistan - we are human and we have limitations. How can you transport Muslims from Kerala and Tamilnadu to either east or west Pakistan?
One has to think of the situation in view of the fact that everybody in the train get murdered when moving from Punjab to Punjab and then you have to imagine the movement from south India to east or west Pakistan. You know in one of recent LA Times or Washington Post articles it was leaked the people around Obama are usually at a loss because of one of his habits. He just takes decisions without thinking about the difficulties of its physical implementations. Now partition stands physically implemented. The next problem is to design an interface between Muslims and the rest of India - mainly Hindus. A smooth interface will be desirable. High tension interface is absolutely suicidal for the Muslims of India. I'll talk about these things later, IA, but I'll add one curious comment from You Tube. Brother uploading Jihadi Taranas made a statement a few years ago that Indian Mullah Arshad Madani is making noise about living peacefully with Hindus. For me Hazrat Madani (DB), statement was completely sane it is pragmatism and it is real politik.
Just to cover the whole spectrum I did not like his snubbing of Pervez Musharraf during latter's India visit. There has to be a middle way in this case also. (Of course no one remains a Musharraf fan by now.)

All those Jihadists dreaming for the Islamic state must come out of idealism ( aka fantasy ) and learn pragmatism from the
Deobandi elders. If the bloodshed of the India partition do not give them a wake-up lesson , you will surely see the same mistakes repeating again and again.

The satanic central bankers are using the ruse of Islamism for a long time starting with the freemason Jamal-Ad-Din Afgani. These people deceived many sincere Muslims.

After 1947 , a central bank was established in the Islamic state of Pakistan.
In 2011 , another central bank was established in Bengazi - the part of Libya liberated by the holy (!) warriors (aka Mujahedins ).

Long live bankers' financed Islamic states !!!!!!!! Pakistan Zindabad !!

Check this
###############

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...oman-Caliphate

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...plement-Sharia
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...ressed-Muslims

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...-global-empire
##########