[CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE]

(ARABIC) Kuwaiti Shia donate 23 Million Dinar to Bashar Al-Assad in Syria

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me0it469nP4

[SerycegeBunny]

why? dont they see the atrocities he and his henchmen are committing in syria? is this what their sect teaches?

[medprof]

why? dont they see the atrocities he and his henchmen are committing in syria? is this what their sect teaches?

See there is no such things shia - sunni unity.

You have to kill this snake shia.....

[marcusdexz]

why? dont they see the atrocities he and his henchmen are committing in syria? is this what their sect teaches?

The guy sitting behind with a black turban is called al-Dashti, he is a Kuwaiti Shia member of parliament and scholar, he is originally from Iran, not sure how he received Kuwaiti nationality.

As usual the Jewish Shia support their allies...nothing strange in this picture.

[ttiokjbnhjjillp]

The guy sitting behind with a black turban is called al-Dashti, he is a Kuwaiti Shia member of parliament and scholar, he is originally from Iran, not sure how he received Kuwaiti nationality.

As usual the Jewish Shia support their allies...nothing strange in this picture.

Salaam brother.

I pray you keep well. I heard there is fighting in Tripoly. Is it settling or escalating? Alhamdulillah Syria is uniting many Muslims from lots of places who want to help their brothers and sisters in Syria

[marcusdexz]

Salaam brother.

I pray you keep well. I heard there is fighting in Tripoly. Is it settling or escalating? Alhamdulillah Syria is uniting many Muslims from lots of places who want to help their brothers and sisters in Syria

Salam `Aleykum,

Alhamdulillah, the fighting stopped a couple of days ago, may Allah protect the Muslim lands and ward off the evils of the tyrant.

Thanks keep us in your Du`a!

[Injurnerona]

(ARABIC) Kuwaiti Shia donate 23 Million Dinar to Bashar Al-Assad in Syria

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me0it469nP4

Laanat beshumaar!

[leangarance]

revolting ... looks like ppl have forgotton the 90s gulf war .. that was a form of Allah's azab on them n these kinds of acts r ways of inviting Allah's anger ..
May Allah protect the ppl of Syria n other Muslim countries from the zulm of kuffar n their alliances ..

[StanWatts]

let those who symtapthize with shi'ah revolutions elsewhere take lesson from this. . . the shi'ah tend to have onlys sectarian interests in mind.

[Injurnerona]

let those who symtapthize with shi'ah revolutions elsewhere take lesson from this. . . the shi'ah tend to have onlys sectarian interests in mind.

To everyone of those who think Shias and Sunnis must unite. Let them know that Syria is going through a Shia-Sunni war, rather a revolt against the regime and the regime retaliating. This is a fake propaganda by the media to protect the image of Alawite Shia who are worst than Animals, they are the most deviant of Shias! May Allah protect our dear brothers and sisters in Syria!
I weep sometimes at my heedlessness and self centered nature, but its always in vain unfortunately!

[CruzIzabella]

To everyone of those who think Shias and Sunnis must unite. Let them know that Syria is going through a Shia-Sunni war, rather a revolt against the regime and the regime retaliating. This is a fake propaganda by the media to protect the image of Alawite Shia who are worst than Animals, they are the most deviant of Shias! May Allah protect our dear brothers and sisters in Syria!
I weep sometimes at my heedlessness and self centered nature, but its always in vain unfortunately!

brother,

we need to know how the far away Muslims can help the brothers and sisters in Syria. We all are nothing but one body.

[VomsVomaMew]

why? dont they see the atrocities he and his henchmen are committing in syria? is this what their sect teaches?

they are glad for these atrocities because 1 it is ahlas sunnah being killed and 2 it is keeping a rafidhi in power of an entire nation of ahlas sunnah, adding to teh stregnth of the rawafidh. If we take syria back inshAllah, it will be a severely weakening factor for them and a stergthening factor for us inshAllah

[ricochettty]

I find it a bit surprising that such a sectarian monetary support is being done so brazenly. Am I missing some thing?

[illignocearia]

brother,

we need to know how the far away Muslims can help the brothers and sisters in Syria. We all are nothing but one body.

Assalamu alaikum. Duaa is the weapon of the believers..

[VomsVomaMew]

I find it a bit surprising that such a sectarian monetary support is being done so brazenly. Am I missing some thing?

the shia dont claim to support assad due to sectarianism.

They give the same old lines of "opposing israel", zinoist plot against syria etc

[Injurnerona]

brother,

we need to know how the far away Muslims can help the brothers and sisters in Syria. We all are nothing but one body.

Forget with helping with our hands and going out to help them in Jihad. We ONLY claim to be one body, at least this goes true for me. Claiming and believing in it are two different things. Most of us are so engrossed in our worldly routines and pursuits that we have forgotten about anyone else. Although having a worry about the Ummah and helping them is a sign of Imaan. Our Imaan is so weak.
Yeah, we do help with our money but that is not enough especially we cannot be fully sure whether the supplies and resources reach the desired people who need it or not. We are selfish we have to accept it!

[illignocearia]

the shia dont claim to support assad due to sectarianism.

They give the same old lines of "opposing israel", zinoist plot against syria etc

Yes, but the Shias call other Shias brothers & Alawis cousins.
And vice versa. They are fom the same deviant sect & have a lot of similar deviant beliefs.

[golozhopik]

Shias have always back stabbed the ummah.

This is what they did in Iraq recently and are now doing it in syria.

[SerycegeBunny]

1st nov, 2005.
President George W. Bush recently presented an enlarged rationale for the war on terror, defining the enemy not as a tactic – terrorism – but rather as a discreet category of individuals and organisations united in pursuit of a “radical Islamic empire that spans from Spain to Indonesia”.

The US president noted that these jihadists often associate themselves with separatist movements and nationalist insurgencies in places such as Somalia, Pakistan, Chechnya, Kashmir, the Philippines and Algeria. Their object, he said, was to seize control of one or more of these states, as Osama bin Laden was able to do with Afghanistan in the late 1990s, in order to build a base to promote the overthrow of other non-radical Muslim governments.

The president argued that the war on radical jihadism resembles the west's half-century long struggle against communism. Like the jihadists, the communists sought to identify with local grievances and nationalist insurgencies in order to expand their influence and curb that of the western democracies.

As a rationale for the war on terror, this explanation represents a substantial improvement over earlier administration arguments, which tended either to focus too exclusively on al-Qaeda or, at other times, to suggest that the US was committed to fight against all terrorism everywhere. This new rationale draws a carefully considered median point, recognising that al-Qaeda has changed into a network of largely independent groups operating toward a common objective. Working with others to defeat these groups is now the US's primary objective.

As a rationale for the war in Iraq, this new explanation works only up to a point. The US did not invade Iraq, as the president almost seemed to suggest, in order to save that country from takeover by radical jihadists. Nor is it likely that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the al-Qaeda leader in Iraq, and Mr bin Laden would seize “control of Iraq, its people and its resources” if the US left, as Mr Bush warned.

On the other hand a precipitate American withdrawal from Iraq would risk intensified civil war, large-scale ethnic cleansing and the intervention of neighbouring states, which in turn could create the risk of a wider war. From such chaos the radical jihadists would indeed have much to gain, just as the communists did from the chaos of the first and second world wars.

The analogy between communism and Islamic jihadism leads one to the Vietnam comparison. The reasons for staying in Iraq are similar to those put forward 30 years ago by presidents Johnson and Nixon. The loss of Iraq to the jihadists, Mr Bush stated, would allow Mr Zarqawi, Mr bin Laden and their ilk better to target other states of the region for takeover. This is the domino theory in modern dress.

Of course, in the end, most of the south-east Asian dominos did not fall. That does not mean, however, that the consequences of American withdrawal from Vietnam were not grave. The US suffered a blow to its prestige and self-confidence from which it took at least half a decade to recover. America abandoned 20m South Vietnamese to *decades of fairly brutal repression.

The US did not, in any case, win the cold war by waging a global crusade against communism. On the contrary, successive administrations identified the Soviet Union, not communism, as their main adversary. Washington co-operated with any government, however repressive and communist, that was prepared to resist Soviet influence.

This policy took distinct form under Richard Nixon and was carried forward under all his successors until the Soviet Union disintegrated. Romania, the most corrupt and brutal dictatorship in eastern Europe, became a US favourite because Nicolae Ceausescu, the president, was prepared to buck the Moscow line. China under Mao Zedong was courted by Washington as a counterweight to Moscow. The newly redefined war on terror calls for a comparable exercise in realpolitik. Iraq will never be stabilised without the co-operation of its neighbours, including unsavoury ones such as Syria and Iran.

To stabilise Bosnia, the Clinton administration had to deal with Slobodan Milosevic and Franjo Tudjman, the two men personally responsible for the genocide Washington was trying to stop. To put together a successor regime to the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Bush administration had to deal with the regional states that had been tearing that country apart for 20 years, including Russia, Pakistan, India and Iran. The time has come for a similarly inclusive effort on Iraq.

Iran – a predominantly Shia Muslim nation – may have its own imperial ambitions but these do not encompass a Sunni Muslim empire stretching from Spain to Indonesia. Iran collaborated with the US in overthrowing the Taliban. Iran is, after the US, the most important foreign sponsor of the current government in Baghdad. Tehran is, indeed, as strongly opposed to an Iraq controlled by Mr Zarqawi and Mr bin Laden as is Washington.

Winston Churchill, Britain's wartime prime minister, speaking in justification of his alliance with the Soviet Union, said: “If Hitler had invaded hell, I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil.” Now the Islamic jihadists have invaded Iraq, perhaps it is time for a favourable reference to our main enemy's bitterest rival.

source

[CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE]

Shiism is an Takfiri and voilent sect. Their whole sect is based on hatred, revenge and emotions.

Shia Book "Anwar Numania page 211":
"It is narrated that sparrow loves fulan (Abubakr) and fulan (Umar) and it is a Sunni. It should be killed in any way possible and executed and then eaten".