[StanWatts]

Whatever dude! Books of najdi's are full of dis-respect to ahle-bayt.

So shut up okay.

and how did bashr come into power.. 76% sunnis are in syria . were they sleeping ????

Sunnis are always dumb and stupid... you know why because there are sunni's who say shia-sunni unity etc and think shia are our brothers..

Death to shia , Kill a shia u will get a reward of killing 2 jews.

they are the one spoiling ahlus sunnah wal jamah from its roots , then we have najdi wahabies who are convincing people that they r ahlus sunnah wal jamah.. But hey danny they are not !

then we have a sect in the sub continent (deobandi's ) who thinks the najdi's are our brothers.... many deobnadi's dont but many do ..... they are totaaly essed up in their heads. different opinions

Let me tell you openly on this forum what The problem with deobandi's is

1) it doesn't know what it has to eat and what it has to throw up

2) have you heard the saying " kutta apne maalik ka wafadaar hota hai " The Dog ( deobandi ) is faithful to his master ( saudi sheikhs) since many madarsah of deobandi's are runned by them and yes they provide money to them so yessssssssssss they have to speak good about saudi scholars. where as you if you look at the opinions of early deobandi scholars they were against the beliefs of najdi's.

Shaykh Abd
al-Aziz al-Dehlawi (Allah have mercy on him), after studying Ibn Taymiyya�s Minhaj
al-Sunnah, was immensely distressed by his undermining of the Ahl al-Bayt (members
of the Prophet's family) and the Sufis.
Imam Anwar Shah al-Kashmiri then mentioned that his teacher Shaykh Mawlana
Husayn Ahmad al-Madani (Allah have mercy on him) was quite unsympathetic towards
Imam Ibn Taymiyya. He even disliked the title of �Shaykh al-Islam� being used for
him, hence he became upset when Shaykh Muhammad Zakariyya al-Kandahlawi (Allah
have mercy on him) used this title for Imam Ibn Taymiyya in one his works.
He then goes on to say that the most balanced approach with regards to Imam Ibn
Taymiyya is the approach of Imam Dhahabi, Imam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani and others, in
that one may benefit from his great and extensive works, but be wary of his isolated
positions that number many in matters of Creed (usul) and particulars of Islamic
jurisprudence (furu�). This is the position of our (Deobandi) scholars. (Malfuzat
Muhaddith Kashmiri, P: 413-414)


see both attachments if you got the guts & dare to reply back


so things are very much messed up ...

That's the reason i don't give a damn to these immature deobandi scholars whom you see giving opinions here & there.

They are all sold out

The likes of Maulana ashraf ali thanwi ra , Maulana Qasim Nanotwi ra will always be missed ....

Infact these immature deobandi scholars should wash their mouth 3 times with the Holy ZamZam water before taking the name of Maulana Ashraf ali thanvi ra , Maulana Qasim nanotwi ra from their rotten mouths.

First of all, you need to calm down if we're going to have an intelligible conversation. Secondly, I'm not a deobandi nor a najdi, so the post above was utterly irrelevant.

Thirdly, would you please respond to my previous post.

Essentially, if you support rebellion against a non-shar'i Imam (I support it), and thus you support Imam al-Husayn against yazid (as I do), why not support the Syrians against their dictator who has not been given bay'ah, and is a secularist and who has committed wholesale murder of his population which justifies rebellion according to Radd al-Muhtar of the Hanafis?

Yes, those who are against Imam al-Husayn may appear to be hypocritical when it comes to this revolution, but why do you have to learn hypocrisy from them? Why can't you support both?
Shukran.