[Glanteeignile]

The political administration of Khyber Agency on Wednesday convicted Dr Shakil Afridi, the man who helped the CIA track down Osama bin Laden, and awarded him 33 years in jail on charges of treason, officials said.

Dr Afridi was accused of running a fake vaccination campaign in which he collected DNA samples, which may have helped the American intelligence agency find Osama bin Laden in the garrison city of Abbottabad.

An official of political administration in Khyber Agency told The News that the court of Assistant Political Agent (APA), Bara, Mohammad Nasir Khan, found Dr Shakil Afridi guilty and awarded him 33 years imprisonment under Section 11 of the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR) and sections 121-A (conspiracy to commit offence against the state), 123 (concealing with intent to facilitate design to wage war against state), 123-A (condemnation of the creation of the state and advocacy of abolition of its sovereignty) and 124 (assaulting president, governor, etc, with the intention to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

The APA awarded 10-year sentence and imposed Rs100,000 fine on the accused under Section 121-A PPC, 11-year sentence and Rs100,000 fine under Section 123 PPC, 10-year sentence with a fine of Rs100,000 under Section 123-A PPC and a three-year sentence with fine of Rs20,000 under Section 124 PPC, read with Section 11 of the FCR.

The APA, who was acting as executive and judicial officer at the same time, on the recommendations of the Qaumi Jirga, also announced a fine of Rs320,000 on the accused. Dr Shakil will have to undergo an additional term of three years if he fails to pay the fine.

After the sentence, the political administration shifted the convict to the Central Prison, Peshawar, amid tight security. The APA said that Shakil Afridi had been in the custody of political administration and his trial was held under the FCR within two weeks.

On March 29, the Health Department terminated Dr Shakil Afridi from service for organising an unauthorised US-sponsored vaccination campaign in Abbottabad to collect the DNA samples of the people living in the compound where al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden lived with his family. The provincial government acted on a summary received in August from the health directorate of Federally Administered Tribal Areas, which was not authorised to initiate an inquiry against an officer above Grade 18.

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Health Department, in its notification, stated that Shakil Afridi had been terminated under the Efficiency & Disciplinary (E&D) Rules for being involved in anti-state activities. Prior to his termination, 15 lady health workers, who were a part of the vaccination campaign, were also terminated from their jobs.

Dr Shakil Afridi was arrested by security agencies in July 2011, about two months after Osama bin Laden was killed by US commandos in Abbottabad, and his whereabouts were unknown to his family members. After his conviction, the authorities in Khyber Agency claimed that he was in their custody.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-New...rs-for-treason

[Lymneterfeiff]

We should feel happy about it, I guess..

[JulieSmithdccd]

Iran deals with them better.

[nicktender]

What about the napak army that has been treasoning for years, including the government?

[Lypepuddyu]

Did read about this today...

[Maryjasmine]

So which one is it then?

1. americans faked the killing and sea burial of usama bin laden, hence they could not and did not provide actual solid proof of the incident?

2. americans did not fake the killing of usama bin laden and actually did find him with the help of the accused?

3. the accused and the public are just made to think that activities of the accused lead to the killing of usama bin laden?

[Ubgvuncd]

So which one is it then?

1. americans faked the killing and sea burial of usama bin laden, hence they could not and did not provide actual solid proof of the incident?

2. americans did not fake the killing of usama bin laden and actually did find him with the help of the accused?

3. the accused and the public are just made to think that activities of the accused lead to the killing of usama bin laden?

I think the whole "killing" was one big drama. Remember the Taliban renaissance in 2010-2011?... ameerul muSHRIKeen Obama prob. needed sth to occupy the journalists with. Otherwise everyday they would be asking, "How many more coffins from Afghanistan b4 we concede defeat?"

This is what Hadhrat Mufti A S Desai's Majlisul Ulama of S Africa wroote about the "killing"

Osama Bin Laden; Massive Deception
Monday, May 09 2011 Written by Administrator

4 Jumadal Ukhra 1432 (9 May 2011)

OSAMA BIN LADEN

THE MASSIVE DECEPTION AND FRAUD OF HIS CAPTURE AND KILLING


“VERILY, THEY CONSPIRED THEIR PLOTS WHILST (THE ULTIMATE RESULT) OF THEIR PLOTS IS WITH ALLAH EVEN THOUGH THEIR

PLOTS (ARE OF SUCH A MASSIVE NATURE) THAT MOUNTAINS COULD BE DISPLACED.” (Ibraaheem, Aayat 46)


THE ‘24-HOUR’ DECEPTION

The date was 17 August 1988 when the Pakistan Air Force aircraft in which President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan was travelling, was destroyed by an act of sabotage conspired by the U.S.A. who was not prepared to see Ziaul Haq aid the Afghan Mujahideen who had routed and expelled the Russians, to establish an Islamic government in Kabul. No autopsies and investigations were allowed. Brigadier Mohammed Yusuf of the Pakistan army, stated: “A U.S. official was to announce that the bodies were not available for autopsy as Muslim custom requires burial within 24 hours. While this is true in normal circumstances, it never applies within the Services, as shown by Army medical staff at Bahawalpur when they automatically made preparations to proceed. ….So it was an act of mass murder (More than 31 people were murdered by this act of U.S. sabotage). ….Assistant Defence Secretary Richard Armitage justified the lack of any serious investigations into the sabotage by claiming, (“we were”) hopefully moving Pakistan in a more democratic manner…” The State Department did four things immediately after the crash which, taken together, point unerringly at a cover-up. First, within hours, it sent a team of purely technical airforce advisers to assist the PAF Board of Inquiry. Secondly, it did not insist, through its embassy, on autopsies on the bodies of the victims, particularly the crew, but rather allowed them to be buried knowing that essential evidence as to how the crash was caused was being buried with them. Thirdly, it sent a deputy National Security Adviser, Robert Oakley, to take over Raphel’s post. He could be relied on to sit on the lid of the can. Fourthly, and most importantly, it vetoed the FBI’s request to go to Pakistan. Oliver Revell, FBI’s Assistant had requested clearance and on 21 August had been given it verbally, but within hours, it had been withdrawn”

Regurgitating the same 24 hour deception, it is currently reported:

“Pentagon officials said Monday that Bin Laden’s body was handled in accordance with Muslim traditions, which include strict rules on burial taking place 24 hours after death.” Sources confirmed to CBS News national security correspondent David Martin that his body was released into the sea from a U.S. Navy vessel on Monday, likely into the Indian Ocean.”

True to form, the U.S. Shaitaan and Arch-Terrorist, pretending to respect Islamic rites to conceal its barbarism, once again concocted its ’24-Hour’ Deception to cover up the evidence of its massive LIE and conspiracy. The 24-Hour conspiratorial stunt was presented to cover up and bury the evidence related to the US murder of President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan in 1988. Today this Master Plotter again resurrected the same 24-Hour Lie and Deception in its clumsy attempt to bury or sink the evidence which would have exploded the myth of the ‘capture and killing’ of Osama Bin Laden.

That Osama is dead, there is hardly any doubt. That he was captured and killed by US forces is a massive LIE which even the baboons inhabiting the Amazon jungle will reject with mirth and contempt. The much-advertized circumstances surrounding his alleged capture, killing and ‘burial’ at sea may be swallowed by the U.S. public famous for its donkey mentality, but people of intelligence outrightly reject the brazenly conspicuous lies and stunts with which the US is now vainly attempting to convince the world.

Either a dead donkey was thrown into the sea for the mental consumption of a donkey public or no such mock sea burial ever took place. Who witnessed the event which in terms of western understanding is supposed to be a momentous occasion? What evidence is there that if any such alleged ‘burial’ occurred, it was Osama’s body? His alleged capture, the events during the confrontation, his killing, the area where he was allegedly captured and numerous other facts are all clouded with an illogical mystery which is unacceptable to people who possess rational brains.

If Osama was captured ‘alive’ as one version of the murtad, Obama’s story goes, he would have been very unceremoniously and with great fanfare and jubilation taken to America where the US government would have extracted maximum publicity to bolster the plummeting ratings of the murtad, Obama and his party of plotters. It would be the ideal scenario of the US conspirators to parade Osama at a mock trial in US courts where a system of jungle law reigns, in the same way as they had abducted Sister Aafiyah from Afghanistan, tortured her brutally, put her on a mock and farcical trial in a US kangaroo court where the US jungle judge refused to listen to her testimony, then sentenced her to spend her life in a US dungeon.


THE DISCREPANCIES

(1) The BBC News reported: “The US military took this requirement (of burying as soon as possible according to Islamic tradition) seriously, burying the body within hours. Religious rites were carried on the deck of a US aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson. The body, shrouded in a white sheet and placed in a weighted bag, was then placed on a flat board, tipped up, and eased into the Arabian Sea.

This occurred at 0600GMT, approximately 12 hours after the fire fight during which Osama Bin Laden was shot in the head. After this first shot, he was shot again, to make sure that he was dead. The body was then flown to Afghanistan and Bin Laden’s identity was confirmed.

The US has also claimed that no one in the Muslim world was prepared to accept the body of Osama. Both claims are blatant lies. The one report released by US authorities say that the body was dumped in the Arabian sea. The other report states the Indian Ocean. Almost the entire Muslim world would have been prepared to accept his body. But the US could make no such request because there simply was no body of Osama. Osama had died years ago and was buried in some unmarked grave in Afghanistan as is the normal practice for burying the Shuhada (Martyrs) in Afghanistan.


(2) The US claims that Osama was captured after a ‘fire fight’. He was shot once, then again a second time to ‘ensure’ he was dead. The 12 year old daughter of Osama has allegedly said that she was present went her unarmed father was killed by US forces. The Daily News of Pakistan contradicting the US claim that its ‘Seals’ had tried to capture Osama alive, but killed him when he resisted, said that US forces killed Osama within the first few minutes of the midnight operation. The US, however, has also said that Osama was ‘unarmed’. Yet they have no clear explanation why he was ‘killed’ when he was unarmed.

So many lies have emanated from the US government, that amendments were being made to the original story within hours. There is not a stitch of evidence to prove that a raid had taken place on the alleged hideout of Osama in the military cantonment ‘city’ of Abbotabad.


(3) The alleged hideout is located inside a Pakistani military cantonment. It is a virtual military barracks. The ‘hideout’ house was in close proximity to Pakistan’s top military academy. The place teems with military personnel, army generals, etc. . The design of the supposed ‘hideout’ was not different from numerous houses in Abbottabad, including the high walls and barbed wire. How was is possible for the world’s most wanted man with a $25 million award on his head to have lived and concealed himself for a decade in the heart of Pakistan’s elite military barracks without the huge US, and Pakistan’s ISI and the many other security establishment having the faintest idea?

(4) A reporter in London wrote: “Almost as strange as the location of Bin Laden’s final sanctuary was the scant evidence of fighting during the raid. The house appears untouched by violence. A cypress and a maple grow in the garden, but not a leaf out of place. Beyond the compound walls potatoes and cabbages spring from allotment fields uncrushed by soldiers’ boots. Dagga plants burst from the verges in reckless abandon, adding to the sense of bucolic tranquillity. From the outside at least, the aftermath of the historic struggle in house 254 appears chronically underwhelming and quite uncanny.”


These facts - the lies emanating from America, the surreptitious dumping or alleged dumping of a ‘donkey’s’ body into an unknown sea so secretively, leaving no evidence whatsoever of the world’s most hunted, most dangerous ‘terrorist’, to soothe the palates of a public with donkey mentality in the US, and the glaring discrepancies, all indicate that there was no raid by the American cowboys, and no Bin Laden at House No.254. It is inconceivable that a man wanted so much as Osama, could ever have been at the most inconceivable place.

Dr.Paul Craig Roberts, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s term, and also an editor of the Wall Street Journal, writes about the alleged raid: “No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed Bin Laden, in the absence of a fire fight, was murdered by the SEALS with a shot to the head. For those who believe the government’s story that “we got bin Laden”, the operation can only appear to be the most botched operation in history. What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet?”

Debunking the palpably false story of the U.S.A., Dr.Craig says: “The White House has also had to abandon the story that President Obama and his national security team watched tensely as events unfolded in real time (despite the White House having released photos of the team watching tensely), with the operation conveyed into the White House by cameras on the Seals’ helmets. If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no fire fight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a fire fight. Another reason the story had to be abandoned is that if the event was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theatre, there would be no video.”

“The fire fight story was instantly suspicious as not a single SEAL got a scratch, despite being up against al-Qaeda, described by former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld as “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the planet.” Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war”. But there was no fire fight, so where did “the fog of war” come from?”

Continuing, Dr.Paul Craig says: “When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged “discrepancies” that require fundamental alterations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place. The entire episode could just be another event like the August 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against North Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans……..Who can believe that the US would quickly dispose of the evidence that bin Laden had been terminated? The government’s story is not believable that the government dumped the proof of its success into the ocean, but has some photos that might be released someday.”

Another self-contradiction by Obama is his claim that the reason for not releasing the photos of the ‘killed’ Osama was that it is too ‘gruesome’ and that it would be inflammatory to release it. Yet Obama first claimed that Bin Laden was killed by a single shot in his head. How did single bullet render the ‘corpse gruesome’ to prevent its publication - a publication which would give credence to the American story? Writing in the Herald, reporter Stephen Collinson says: “Obama will be aware that the publication of a picture of a dead Bin Laden would lay to rest any conspiracy theories in the wider world that Washington somehow faked his killing. ….US enemies are already beginning to cast doubt on Washington’s word, questioning Bin Laden’s death for propaganda purposes.”

Since there was no dead Bin Laden, Obama could not publish a picture of his corpse.

What then is the dark motive of the US for having resurrected Bin Laden in this childish manner conspicuous for its puerility, clumsiness and incompetency? They (the US plotters) were just as childish and stupid when they perpetrated the massive treachery of blowing up their own World Trade Centre and laying the blame on Osama who was living in the mountains of Afghanistan. The vile agenda was to create justification for the invasion of Afghanistan.

The sinister agenda underlying the clumsy resurrection of Bin Laden is almost certainly to give Obama’s plunging ratings a massive injection of donkey-public support. Fearing defeat in the forthcoming elections, Obama and his clique of pirates were desperate for something spectacular. They are fully aware that Osama had died years ago, hence they felt confident to manipulate his death in order to resurrect him in pursuance of their sinister objective. But, the plot was executed too clumsily. The veneer is too thin and cannot conceal the muck and the fraud. Even the CIA had several years ago said that they “had managed to get the names of some of the medications bin Laden is taking” and they concluded that he was dying of kidney failure.

It is inconceivable that Osama was hiding inside the headquarters of Pakistan’s military organization, a 100 metres from Pakistan’s top military academy, without the military and the intelligence agency being aware thereof. Besides the local intelligence agencies, the place is also covered by the CIA, FBI and other murky outfits such as the U.S.A.’s mercenary murderers, e.g. Blackwater, etc.

If the Pakistani intelligence agency which works closely with its US counterparts had captured Osama and was detaining him, then too, it is not at all feasible to believe that they would keep him in an unguarded house in the elite military area of Abbottabad. It is also highly improbable that the ISI was playing a double game, protecting Osama right within their midst so flagrantly. There is no dearth of American black torture centres in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere where Osama would have been shipped to.

The question remains: Why did the US and Pakistan select the military cantonment area for the fake raid. The simple answer is: They just had no other safe place for staging a fake operation. The military personnel in the cantonment could be relied on to maintain silence whereas in any other area, the people would speak up and inform that there was no such raid in their locality. The US claims that a helicopter carrying its stupid SEALS landed in the backyard of the house, and after the ‘raid’ the US team, before departing detonated and destroyed the helicopter. All of this rubbish happening in the army barracks without the military, intelligence agencies and others having the slightest awareness. The lies are too clumsy and too contradictory to believe anything that emanates from the US government and the security agencies of Napakistan (the Impure Land of treachery and traitors).

The preposterousness of this saga of deceit and deception prompted a businessman, Jehangir Khan who is a close neighbour of house No.254, the alleged ‘hideout house’, to say: “He just could not have lived here among us. Its impossible. He was a huge man hunted by the world. Why would he have chosen to live here, in a military restricted area, so close to the academy and to so many barracks, without proper security detail of his own?”

Commenting on these questions, Anthony Loyd a reporter in London writes: “These are the questions now haunting Pakistan’s government and intelligence agencies. Despite top-level denials of collusion in giving sanctuary to al-Qaeda’s founder, the country’s authorities are nevertheless struggling to explain how the terrorist chief and mass murderer lived unmolested alongside the stalwarts of their security establishment. Many Pakistanis have simply elected to disbelieve that Bin Laden had lived and died among them.”

A local ‘anti-terrorist’ commando on a nearby rooftop commented: “I can’t believe that he was here.” Police officers, government officials and the people in general all reject the idea that Osama was living in house No.254, that there had been a raid and that he was killed there.

The house resembles many other houses in the areas and is quite different from the ‘reinforced stronghold’ described by the US liars in Washington.

It was also claimed about the house: “That gate remained closed almost 24 hours a day. Just occasionally I used to see one man come out, driving a car with tinted windows. We heard that the family who owned it were involved in a feud with another tribe near Peshawar, and had come here to escape. It explained how careful and hidden they were.”

Another person said: “Two more vehicles, a Toyota Corolla and a minibus, sometimes emerging from the green gates. The people within remained more or less hermetically sealed from the community around them. The men never prayed with us or shared any celebration or worry. They bought their supplies elsewhere.”

This furtive setting and aura of intrigue enveloping house 254 were the perfect ingredients to attract the attention of the security and military apparatus. It is inconceivable that despite all the suspicion surrounding the house with the logical consequences of rumour and gossip which generally accompany this type of scenario, the intelligence agencies of Pakistan and the U.S.A. and the military under whose nose Osama allegedly lived for a decade and conducted his so-called ‘international terrorism’ activities, had remained blissfully ignorant and unaware. It is pure lies compounded with more lies. How is it ever possible to believe what Pakistan’s Intelligence officers are now saying, namely: “The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency had no idea Bin Laden was holed up here despite having searched the compound of house 254 in 2003.” In addition to the baboon and donkeys in the U.S.A., there are numerous similar asses and baboons in Pakistan as well. Perhaps, and it is a remote possibility, that the donkeys and apes of Napakistan may swallow this rubbish explanation. Even the senior counter-terrorism official in the U.S.A. commented that it was “inconceivable” that Osama had lived in that house without enjoying “support network” in Pakistan. Yes, that is so if Osama was in fact living there. But high profile brains are not a requisite for dismissing the Lie of the century – a lie just as stupendous as the lie that Osama had engineered the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings.

http://themajlis.co.za/index.php?opt...haqq&Itemid=55

[Cheaperisdeeper]

Just a failed attempt to wash their hands off the martyrdom of Sheikh Usama ru.

[chadnezzrr]

What about the napak army that has been treasoning for years, including the government?

Well, they are the most angelic creatures in Pakistan. Army General Kayani is one of our 'national' heroes while Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani and Zardari are 'elected' representatives! Whatever they do and say is in the 'national' interest of the Pakistanis even if it means selling one's own deen for petty cash! (*Saracastic*).

[Ubgvuncd]

Well, they are the most angelic creatures in Pakistan. Army General Kayani is one of our 'national' heroes while Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani and Zardari are 'elected' representatives! Whatever they do and say is in the 'national' interest of the Pakistanis even if it means selling one's own deen for petty cash! (*Saracastic*).

Bhai

good to hear the truth coming from a Pakistani... Unfortunately most seem to be brainwashed by the media's lies nowadays, do make shukr you have been saved from that deadly trap.

Allah Hafiz

[chadnezzrr]

Bhai

good to hear the truth coming from a Pakistani... Unfortunately most seem to be brainwashed by the media's lies nowadays, do make shukr you have been saved from that deadly trap.

Allah Hafiz

brother!
Alhamdulillah, I make sincere dua for everyone! May Allah save them from being fooled by this Dajjali media. And to save us from the fitna of Nationalism and Democracy which is ruining us right now! Ameen ya rabbal aalameen!

[rolex-buy]

I think the whole "killing" was one big drama. Remember the Taliban renaissance in 2010-2011?... ameerul muSHRIKeen Obama prob. needed sth to occupy the journalists with. Otherwise everyday they would be asking, "How many more coffins from Afghanistan b4 we concede defeat?"

This is what Hadhrat Mufti A S Desai's Majlisul Ulama of S Africa wroote about the "killing"

Osama Bin Laden; Massive Deception
Monday, May 09 2011 Written by Administrator

4 Jumadal Ukhra 1432 (9 May 2011)

OSAMA BIN LADEN

THE MASSIVE DECEPTION AND FRAUD OF HIS CAPTURE AND KILLING


“VERILY, THEY CONSPIRED THEIR PLOTS WHILST (THE ULTIMATE RESULT) OF THEIR PLOTS IS WITH ALLAH EVEN THOUGH THEIR

PLOTS (ARE OF SUCH A MASSIVE NATURE) THAT MOUNTAINS COULD BE DISPLACED.” (Ibraaheem, Aayat 46)


THE ‘24-HOUR’ DECEPTION

The date was 17 August 1988 when the Pakistan Air Force aircraft in which President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan was travelling, was destroyed by an act of sabotage conspired by the U.S.A. who was not prepared to see Ziaul Haq aid the Afghan Mujahideen who had routed and expelled the Russians, to establish an Islamic government in Kabul. No autopsies and investigations were allowed. Brigadier Mohammed Yusuf of the Pakistan army, stated: “A U.S. official was to announce that the bodies were not available for autopsy as Muslim custom requires burial within 24 hours. While this is true in normal circumstances, it never applies within the Services, as shown by Army medical staff at Bahawalpur when they automatically made preparations to proceed. ….So it was an act of mass murder (More than 31 people were murdered by this act of U.S. sabotage). ….Assistant Defence Secretary Richard Armitage justified the lack of any serious investigations into the sabotage by claiming, (“we were”) hopefully moving Pakistan in a more democratic manner…” The State Department did four things immediately after the crash which, taken together, point unerringly at a cover-up. First, within hours, it sent a team of purely technical airforce advisers to assist the PAF Board of Inquiry. Secondly, it did not insist, through its embassy, on autopsies on the bodies of the victims, particularly the crew, but rather allowed them to be buried knowing that essential evidence as to how the crash was caused was being buried with them. Thirdly, it sent a deputy National Security Adviser, Robert Oakley, to take over Raphel’s post. He could be relied on to sit on the lid of the can. Fourthly, and most importantly, it vetoed the FBI’s request to go to Pakistan. Oliver Revell, FBI’s Assistant had requested clearance and on 21 August had been given it verbally, but within hours, it had been withdrawn”

Regurgitating the same 24 hour deception, it is currently reported:

“Pentagon officials said Monday that Bin Laden’s body was handled in accordance with Muslim traditions, which include strict rules on burial taking place 24 hours after death.” Sources confirmed to CBS News national security correspondent David Martin that his body was released into the sea from a U.S. Navy vessel on Monday, likely into the Indian Ocean.”

True to form, the U.S. Shaitaan and Arch-Terrorist, pretending to respect Islamic rites to conceal its barbarism, once again concocted its ’24-Hour’ Deception to cover up the evidence of its massive LIE and conspiracy. The 24-Hour conspiratorial stunt was presented to cover up and bury the evidence related to the US murder of President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan in 1988. Today this Master Plotter again resurrected the same 24-Hour Lie and Deception in its clumsy attempt to bury or sink the evidence which would have exploded the myth of the ‘capture and killing’ of Osama Bin Laden.

That Osama is dead, there is hardly any doubt. That he was captured and killed by US forces is a massive LIE which even the baboons inhabiting the Amazon jungle will reject with mirth and contempt. The much-advertized circumstances surrounding his alleged capture, killing and ‘burial’ at sea may be swallowed by the U.S. public famous for its donkey mentality, but people of intelligence outrightly reject the brazenly conspicuous lies and stunts with which the US is now vainly attempting to convince the world.

Either a dead donkey was thrown into the sea for the mental consumption of a donkey public or no such mock sea burial ever took place. Who witnessed the event which in terms of western understanding is supposed to be a momentous occasion? What evidence is there that if any such alleged ‘burial’ occurred, it was Osama’s body? His alleged capture, the events during the confrontation, his killing, the area where he was allegedly captured and numerous other facts are all clouded with an illogical mystery which is unacceptable to people who possess rational brains.

If Osama was captured ‘alive’ as one version of the murtad, Obama’s story goes, he would have been very unceremoniously and with great fanfare and jubilation taken to America where the US government would have extracted maximum publicity to bolster the plummeting ratings of the murtad, Obama and his party of plotters. It would be the ideal scenario of the US conspirators to parade Osama at a mock trial in US courts where a system of jungle law reigns, in the same way as they had abducted Sister Aafiyah from Afghanistan, tortured her brutally, put her on a mock and farcical trial in a US kangaroo court where the US jungle judge refused to listen to her testimony, then sentenced her to spend her life in a US dungeon.


THE DISCREPANCIES

(1) The BBC News reported: “The US military took this requirement (of burying as soon as possible according to Islamic tradition) seriously, burying the body within hours. Religious rites were carried on the deck of a US aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson. The body, shrouded in a white sheet and placed in a weighted bag, was then placed on a flat board, tipped up, and eased into the Arabian Sea.

This occurred at 0600GMT, approximately 12 hours after the fire fight during which Osama Bin Laden was shot in the head. After this first shot, he was shot again, to make sure that he was dead. The body was then flown to Afghanistan and Bin Laden’s identity was confirmed.

The US has also claimed that no one in the Muslim world was prepared to accept the body of Osama. Both claims are blatant lies. The one report released by US authorities say that the body was dumped in the Arabian sea. The other report states the Indian Ocean. Almost the entire Muslim world would have been prepared to accept his body. But the US could make no such request because there simply was no body of Osama. Osama had died years ago and was buried in some unmarked grave in Afghanistan as is the normal practice for burying the Shuhada (Martyrs) in Afghanistan.


(2) The US claims that Osama was captured after a ‘fire fight’. He was shot once, then again a second time to ‘ensure’ he was dead. The 12 year old daughter of Osama has allegedly said that she was present went her unarmed father was killed by US forces. The Daily News of Pakistan contradicting the US claim that its ‘Seals’ had tried to capture Osama alive, but killed him when he resisted, said that US forces killed Osama within the first few minutes of the midnight operation. The US, however, has also said that Osama was ‘unarmed’. Yet they have no clear explanation why he was ‘killed’ when he was unarmed.

So many lies have emanated from the US government, that amendments were being made to the original story within hours. There is not a stitch of evidence to prove that a raid had taken place on the alleged hideout of Osama in the military cantonment ‘city’ of Abbotabad.


(3) The alleged hideout is located inside a Pakistani military cantonment. It is a virtual military barracks. The ‘hideout’ house was in close proximity to Pakistan’s top military academy. The place teems with military personnel, army generals, etc. . The design of the supposed ‘hideout’ was not different from numerous houses in Abbottabad, including the high walls and barbed wire. How was is possible for the world’s most wanted man with a $25 million award on his head to have lived and concealed himself for a decade in the heart of Pakistan’s elite military barracks without the huge US, and Pakistan’s ISI and the many other security establishment having the faintest idea?

(4) A reporter in London wrote: “Almost as strange as the location of Bin Laden’s final sanctuary was the scant evidence of fighting during the raid. The house appears untouched by violence. A cypress and a maple grow in the garden, but not a leaf out of place. Beyond the compound walls potatoes and cabbages spring from allotment fields uncrushed by soldiers’ boots. Dagga plants burst from the verges in reckless abandon, adding to the sense of bucolic tranquillity. From the outside at least, the aftermath of the historic struggle in house 254 appears chronically underwhelming and quite uncanny.”


These facts - the lies emanating from America, the surreptitious dumping or alleged dumping of a ‘donkey’s’ body into an unknown sea so secretively, leaving no evidence whatsoever of the world’s most hunted, most dangerous ‘terrorist’, to soothe the palates of a public with donkey mentality in the US, and the glaring discrepancies, all indicate that there was no raid by the American cowboys, and no Bin Laden at House No.254. It is inconceivable that a man wanted so much as Osama, could ever have been at the most inconceivable place.

Dr.Paul Craig Roberts, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s term, and also an editor of the Wall Street Journal, writes about the alleged raid: “No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed Bin Laden, in the absence of a fire fight, was murdered by the SEALS with a shot to the head. For those who believe the government’s story that “we got bin Laden”, the operation can only appear to be the most botched operation in history. What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet?”

Debunking the palpably false story of the U.S.A., Dr.Craig says: “The White House has also had to abandon the story that President Obama and his national security team watched tensely as events unfolded in real time (despite the White House having released photos of the team watching tensely), with the operation conveyed into the White House by cameras on the Seals’ helmets. If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no fire fight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a fire fight. Another reason the story had to be abandoned is that if the event was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theatre, there would be no video.”

“The fire fight story was instantly suspicious as not a single SEAL got a scratch, despite being up against al-Qaeda, described by former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld as “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the planet.” Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war”. But there was no fire fight, so where did “the fog of war” come from?”

Continuing, Dr.Paul Craig says: “When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged “discrepancies” that require fundamental alterations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place. The entire episode could just be another event like the August 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against North Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans……..Who can believe that the US would quickly dispose of the evidence that bin Laden had been terminated? The government’s story is not believable that the government dumped the proof of its success into the ocean, but has some photos that might be released someday.”

Another self-contradiction by Obama is his claim that the reason for not releasing the photos of the ‘killed’ Osama was that it is too ‘gruesome’ and that it would be inflammatory to release it. Yet Obama first claimed that Bin Laden was killed by a single shot in his head. How did single bullet render the ‘corpse gruesome’ to prevent its publication - a publication which would give credence to the American story? Writing in the Herald, reporter Stephen Collinson says: “Obama will be aware that the publication of a picture of a dead Bin Laden would lay to rest any conspiracy theories in the wider world that Washington somehow faked his killing. ….US enemies are already beginning to cast doubt on Washington’s word, questioning Bin Laden’s death for propaganda purposes.”

Since there was no dead Bin Laden, Obama could not publish a picture of his corpse.

What then is the dark motive of the US for having resurrected Bin Laden in this childish manner conspicuous for its puerility, clumsiness and incompetency? They (the US plotters) were just as childish and stupid when they perpetrated the massive treachery of blowing up their own World Trade Centre and laying the blame on Osama who was living in the mountains of Afghanistan. The vile agenda was to create justification for the invasion of Afghanistan.

The sinister agenda underlying the clumsy resurrection of Bin Laden is almost certainly to give Obama’s plunging ratings a massive injection of donkey-public support. Fearing defeat in the forthcoming elections, Obama and his clique of pirates were desperate for something spectacular. They are fully aware that Osama had died years ago, hence they felt confident to manipulate his death in order to resurrect him in pursuance of their sinister objective. But, the plot was executed too clumsily. The veneer is too thin and cannot conceal the muck and the fraud. Even the CIA had several years ago said that they “had managed to get the names of some of the medications bin Laden is taking” and they concluded that he was dying of kidney failure.

It is inconceivable that Osama was hiding inside the headquarters of Pakistan’s military organization, a 100 metres from Pakistan’s top military academy, without the military and the intelligence agency being aware thereof. Besides the local intelligence agencies, the place is also covered by the CIA, FBI and other murky outfits such as the U.S.A.’s mercenary murderers, e.g. Blackwater, etc.

If the Pakistani intelligence agency which works closely with its US counterparts had captured Osama and was detaining him, then too, it is not at all feasible to believe that they would keep him in an unguarded house in the elite military area of Abbottabad. It is also highly improbable that the ISI was playing a double game, protecting Osama right within their midst so flagrantly. There is no dearth of American black torture centres in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere where Osama would have been shipped to.

The question remains: Why did the US and Pakistan select the military cantonment area for the fake raid. The simple answer is: They just had no other safe place for staging a fake operation. The military personnel in the cantonment could be relied on to maintain silence whereas in any other area, the people would speak up and inform that there was no such raid in their locality. The US claims that a helicopter carrying its stupid SEALS landed in the backyard of the house, and after the ‘raid’ the US team, before departing detonated and destroyed the helicopter. All of this rubbish happening in the army barracks without the military, intelligence agencies and others having the slightest awareness. The lies are too clumsy and too contradictory to believe anything that emanates from the US government and the security agencies of Napakistan (the Impure Land of treachery and traitors).

The preposterousness of this saga of deceit and deception prompted a businessman, Jehangir Khan who is a close neighbour of house No.254, the alleged ‘hideout house’, to say: “He just could not have lived here among us. Its impossible. He was a huge man hunted by the world. Why would he have chosen to live here, in a military restricted area, so close to the academy and to so many barracks, without proper security detail of his own?”

Commenting on these questions, Anthony Loyd a reporter in London writes: “These are the questions now haunting Pakistan’s government and intelligence agencies. Despite top-level denials of collusion in giving sanctuary to al-Qaeda’s founder, the country’s authorities are nevertheless struggling to explain how the terrorist chief and mass murderer lived unmolested alongside the stalwarts of their security establishment. Many Pakistanis have simply elected to disbelieve that Bin Laden had lived and died among them.”

A local ‘anti-terrorist’ commando on a nearby rooftop commented: “I can’t believe that he was here.” Police officers, government officials and the people in general all reject the idea that Osama was living in house No.254, that there had been a raid and that he was killed there.

The house resembles many other houses in the areas and is quite different from the ‘reinforced stronghold’ described by the US liars in Washington.

It was also claimed about the house: “That gate remained closed almost 24 hours a day. Just occasionally I used to see one man come out, driving a car with tinted windows. We heard that the family who owned it were involved in a feud with another tribe near Peshawar, and had come here to escape. It explained how careful and hidden they were.”

Another person said: “Two more vehicles, a Toyota Corolla and a minibus, sometimes emerging from the green gates. The people within remained more or less hermetically sealed from the community around them. The men never prayed with us or shared any celebration or worry. They bought their supplies elsewhere.”

This furtive setting and aura of intrigue enveloping house 254 were the perfect ingredients to attract the attention of the security and military apparatus. It is inconceivable that despite all the suspicion surrounding the house with the logical consequences of rumour and gossip which generally accompany this type of scenario, the intelligence agencies of Pakistan and the U.S.A. and the military under whose nose Osama allegedly lived for a decade and conducted his so-called ‘international terrorism’ activities, had remained blissfully ignorant and unaware. It is pure lies compounded with more lies. How is it ever possible to believe what Pakistan’s Intelligence officers are now saying, namely: “The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency had no idea Bin Laden was holed up here despite having searched the compound of house 254 in 2003.” In addition to the baboon and donkeys in the U.S.A., there are numerous similar asses and baboons in Pakistan as well. Perhaps, and it is a remote possibility, that the donkeys and apes of Napakistan may swallow this rubbish explanation. Even the senior counter-terrorism official in the U.S.A. commented that it was “inconceivable” that Osama had lived in that house without enjoying “support network” in Pakistan. Yes, that is so if Osama was in fact living there. But high profile brains are not a requisite for dismissing the Lie of the century – a lie just as stupendous as the lie that Osama had engineered the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings.

http://themajlis.co.za/index.php?opt...haqq&Itemid=55

aoa,
superb.
respect for desai sahab

though one more question: why did al qaida admit bin laden was dead after US 'killed' him and not after he had actually died in afghanistan as it is said here?

[Ubgvuncd]

aoa,
superb.
respect for desai sahab

though one more question: why did al qaida admit bin laden was dead after US 'killed' him and not after he had actually died in afghanistan as it is said here?

Bro mh16388

Al CIAda will admit whatever ameerul muSHRIkeen Obama tells them to admit. I have had enough of being fooled by "Fake CIA Osama videos" for 10 years. "Osama" repotedly "confessed" to 911 as well!!!

We must distinguish between the foreign Arab mujahideen fighting in Afghan v "Al CIAda"...

[rolex-buy]

Bro mh16388

Al CIAda will admit whatever ameerul muSHRIkeen Obama tells them to admit. I have had enough of being fooled by "Fake CIA Osama videos" for 10 years. "Osama" repotedly "confessed" to 911 as well!!!

We must distinguish between the foreign Arab mujahideen fighting in Afghan v "Al CIAda"...

so ur saying al-qaeda is CIA funded terrorist organisation that announced bin laden's death last year?

[JulieSmithdccd]

I think the whole "killing" was one big drama. Remember the Taliban renaissance in 2010-2011?... ameerul muSHRIKeen Obama prob. needed sth to occupy the journalists with. Otherwise everyday they would be asking, "How many more coffins from Afghanistan b4 we concede defeat?"

Indeed Taliban resistance has left some impression on US psyche - at the top level even if they have managed to shield, I mean deceive, the public. But one can not also ignore the fact that they have managed to do all they wanted. Killed all of their high profile targets and perhaps most of the low profile targets. BBC had a news item a few years back in which identities of two British snipers who were employed in Af-Pak leaked accidentally. In another report another similar sniper had managed to kill many scores of targets. In view of that our efforts in trying to explore all the diverse Bin Laden scenarios seems like a wastage of time and effort on our parts.
This is what Hadhrat Mufti A S Desai's Majlisul Ulama of S Africa wroote about the "killing"

Osama Bin Laden; Massive Deception
Monday, May 09 2011 Written by Administrator

4 Jumadal Ukhra 1432 (9 May 2011)

OSAMA BIN LADEN

THE MASSIVE DECEPTION AND FRAUD OF HIS CAPTURE AND KILLING


“VERILY, THEY CONSPIRED THEIR PLOTS WHILST (THE ULTIMATE RESULT) OF THEIR PLOTS IS WITH ALLAH EVEN THOUGH THEIR

PLOTS (ARE OF SUCH A MASSIVE NATURE) THAT MOUNTAINS COULD BE DISPLACED.” (Ibraaheem, Aayat 46)


THE ‘24-HOUR’ DECEPTION

The date was 17 August 1988 when the Pakistan Air Force aircraft in which President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan was travelling, was destroyed by an act of sabotage conspired by the U.S.A. who was not prepared to see Ziaul Haq aid the Afghan Mujahideen who had routed and expelled the Russians, to establish an Islamic government in Kabul. No autopsies and investigations were allowed. Brigadier Mohammed Yusuf of the Pakistan army, stated: “A U.S. official was to announce that the bodies were not available for autopsy as Muslim custom requires burial within 24 hours. While this is true in normal circumstances, it never applies within the Services, as shown by Army medical staff at Bahawalpur when they automatically made preparations to proceed. ….So it was an act of mass murder (More than 31 people were murdered by this act of U.S. sabotage). ….Assistant Defence Secretary Richard Armitage justified the lack of any serious investigations into the sabotage by claiming, (“we were”) hopefully moving Pakistan in a more democratic manner…” The State Department did four things immediately after the crash which, taken together, point unerringly at a cover-up. First, within hours, it sent a team of purely technical airforce advisers to assist the PAF Board of Inquiry. Secondly, it did not insist, through its embassy, on autopsies on the bodies of the victims, particularly the crew, but rather allowed them to be buried knowing that essential evidence as to how the crash was caused was being buried with them. Thirdly, it sent a deputy National Security Adviser, Robert Oakley, to take over Raphel’s post. He could be relied on to sit on the lid of the can. Fourthly, and most importantly, it vetoed the FBI’s request to go to Pakistan. Oliver Revell, FBI’s Assistant had requested clearance and on 21 August had been given it verbally, but within hours, it had been withdrawn”

Regurgitating the same 24 hour deception, it is currently reported:

“Pentagon officials said Monday that Bin Laden’s body was handled in accordance with Muslim traditions, which include strict rules on burial taking place 24 hours after death.” Sources confirmed to CBS News national security correspondent David Martin that his body was released into the sea from a U.S. Navy vessel on Monday, likely into the Indian Ocean.” I suppose it will be fair to assume that US and CIA had some thing to do with General's death including the 30 others. CIA had on its website that they do take operations in foreign lands - I do not know whether they still have it.

And it is indeed silly move on their part to assert that they honour Islamic sentiments. Us in particular and the west in general are by and large anti-Islamic. Unfortunately there is enough number of our brothers and sisters who assure them that their attempts and efforts and ideas towards reforming and reshaping Islam are the right thing to do. They reinforce each other and thus have created a cycle that is virtuous for them and vicious for Muslims.


If Osama was captured ‘alive’ as one version of the murtad, Obama’s story goes, he would have been very unceremoniously and with great fanfare and jubilation taken to America where the US government would have extracted maximum publicity to bolster the plummeting ratings of the murtad, Obama and his party of plotters. Though not directly related to the present topic but the fact that Obama is a murtad does not get its due recognition in Muslim circles.
It would be the ideal scenario of the US conspirators to parade Osama at a mock trial in US courts where a system of jungle law reigns, in the same way as they had abducted Sister Aafiyah from Afghanistan, tortured her brutally, put her on a mock and farcical trial in a US kangaroo court where the US jungle judge refused to listen to her testimony, then sentenced her to spend her life in a US dungeon. And Dr Aafia Siddiqui's is the most horrific of civil cases. She was handed 86 years for an even in which a frail woman takes on the mighty interrogators and she is the only one who is badly hurt. Faiy tale does not get better even in the life of Angelina Jolie.

I'll leave the rest of the article unread in view of the fact that since we are living in extremely difficult times we must make every effort to cling on to the reality for that is the only thing that can provide us ground to plant our feet. If we have not seen Bin Laden body disposal videos then it does not prove that they do not have them. All they have to do do to shut us up is to release them.

[Enfotanab]

Al Qaeda have a media arm called As Sahab where reliable video's are released. These video's inform you that Shaykh was martyred in a raid at the time claimed by the US. Taliban have a well known website which ALSO released a statement within a few days, claiming they had verified Shaykh's martydom. If the words of these two groups is not enough for you, then what is?

[Ubgvuncd]

Al Qaeda have a media arm called As Sahab where reliable video's are released. These video's inform you that Shaykh was martyred in a raid at the time claimed by the US. Taliban have a well known website which ALSO released a statement within a few days, claiming they had verified Shaykh's martydom. If the words of these two groups is not enough for you, then what is?

Is it the same As sahab that glorified the (haraam) London and Madrid bombings?

[Ubgvuncd]

Al Qaeda have a media arm called As Sahab where reliable video's are released. These video's inform you that Shaykh was martyred in a raid at the time claimed by the US. Taliban have a well known website which ALSO released a statement within a few days, claiming they had verified Shaykh's martydom. If the words of these two groups is not enough for you, then what is?

Bro

how about the dozens of "Al Qaeda videos" where Shaikh Osama supposedly takes "credit" for 911? Even the kuffaar don't believe it...

Btw Osama's face kept changing throughout the past decade. May be their software kept malfunctioning so they to edit his face a little...

[Enfotanab]

Bro

how about the dozens of "Al Qaeda videos" where Shaikh Osama supposedly takes "credit" for 911? Even the kuffaar don't believe it...

Btw Osama's face kept changing throughout the past decade. May be their software kept malfunctioning so they to edit his face a little...

Those aren't the video's I'm talking about and they weren't video's released by As Sahab as far as I'm aware. As Sahab even interviewed Al Awlakhi and this is available on youtube. Check what As Sahab has been saying regarding the martydom of Bin Laden. And check the Taliban's website, I'm sure you don't doubt the authenticity of that

[Enfotanab]

Is it the same As sahab that glorified the (haraam) London and Madrid bombings?

I don't know, I don't keep up with their video's and stuff. The only video's of As Sahab I have seen are those of TTP interviews, interviews of Ayman Al zawahiri and Al Awlakhi