[DuePew]

Subahanallah, I used to listen his lectures but quite shocked that he accuses the oppressed Sunni-majority people in Syria as 'terrorists'.

He speaks very often about 'internal eyes' or 'spiritual eyes', however, it seems that he himself is blinded by the narrow sectarianism as
he has a soft corner for the Rafidi shias at the expense ahle sunnah. In a siting with Dr. Israr (ra), he (Imran Hosein) has spoken positive about satanic revolution in Iran and its leader devil Khomeini.

He has tons of lectures about Dajjal but he himself fails to identify that Butcher al-Kalb of Syria is a Dajjal and Qaddafi of Libya was a Dajjal. Bashar al-Kalb wants to be worshiped and so did Qaddafi.

See the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bllV6yY64G0&sns=fb

May Allah save us from the misguidance of such 'scholar'

[Lapsinuibense]

Subahanallah, I used to listen his lectures but quite shocked that he accuses the oppressed Sunni-majority people in Syria as 'terrorists'.

He speaks very often about 'internal eyes' or 'spiritual eyes', however, it seems that he himself is blinded by the narrow sectarianism as
he has a soft corner for the Rafidi shias at the expense ahle sunnah. In a siting with Dr. Israr (ra), he (Imran Hosein) has spoken positive about satanic revolution in Iran and its leader devil Khomeini.

He has tons of lectures about Dajjal but he himself fails to identify that Butcher al-Kalb of Syria is a Dajjal and Qaddafi of Libya was a Dajjal. Bashar al-Kalb wants to be worshiped and so did Qaddafi.

See the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bllV6yY64G0&sns=fb

May Allah save us from the misguidance of such 'scholar'

Salaamu alaiykum
Talk about something more productive bro. Insulting or "exposing" someone won't really do as much for you on the day of qiyaama than praising Allah and being grateful and learning more about his deen. Wallahu a'lam.

[TheBestCheapestOEM]

He talks more on Syria in this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD8Nj...1&feature=plcp

Jump to 10:30 and the end minutes.

[XzBZB2UV]

Very disappointing

[PemiaGefe]

Looks like quite a turn around by Sheikh. Just listen to the whole interview, why is he so bitter with Turks, especially the army that conquered Constantinople? Wasn't that a blessed army?

Why is he becoming so pro-Iran and Shia? How can a person who knows so much be blinded by what Iran has got going under the wraps?

Interesting times these are, not sure who to trust and who not to!

[nicktender]

Brother he denies rajm as death penalty. That alone would make him a misguided devil.

[Enfotanab]

Brother he denies rajm as death penalty. That alone would make him a misguided devil.

And isn't this kufr that takes one out of the millah? It would be best if someone contacts him regarding his stance on the issue. Does anyone know of his email address? I know at least a couple of people on this forum had emailed him and he gave very quick responses (this was on a different thread about dajjal I think)

[BorBitExatini]

Looks like quite a turn around by Sheikh. Just listen to the whole interview, why is he so bitter with Turks, especially the army that conquered Constantinople? Wasn't that a blessed army?

Why is he becoming so pro-Iran and Shia? How can a person who knows so much be blinded by what Iran has got going under the wraps?

Interesting times these are, not sure who to trust and who not to!

Don't forget bro- money can buy Imaan also (its not true for everyone).

[boiffrona]

And isn't this kufr that takes one out of the millah? It would be best if someone contacts him regarding his stance on the issue. Does anyone know of his email address? I know at least a couple of people on this forum had emailed him and he gave very quick responses (this was on a different thread about dajjal I think)

Salaam,
I have his email address.
I have emailed him a few times in the last few years and he has always given a reply.
I had an issue not too far back and a dispute with a shia about a certain interpretation of the Quran and bought it to IH attention, he kindly put me in contact with someone very fluent in the arabic language who was quick to clear the matter up.
If someone would like to write an email I am happy to froward it on but until I have listened to the lectures on Syria I am unable to compose the email myself.
Or I can pass on his email address via mods.

[JesikaFclq]

Have any of your read aqida tahawi? It says clearly in the end that rebellion is haram alayk. And this is what these people are doing, rebelling, and not even for allah's sake, but for this silly western abstraction called democracy. Traditionally the ulema said you should be patient, have sabr with the ruler, he won't live forever. Pray for a better ruler, don't rebel because what comes from that is way worse than the thulm of a tyrant.

[Enfotanab]

Have any of your read aqida tahawi? It says clearly in the end that rebellion is haram alayk. And this is what these people are doing, rebelling, and not even for allah's sake, but for this silly western abstraction called democracy. Traditionally the ulema said you should be patient, have sabr with the ruler, he won't live forever. Pray for a better ruler, don't rebel because what comes from that is way worse than the thulm of a tyrant.

Have you ever read Reliance of the Traveller or a similar book? Where the condition of not rebelling against a ruler is explained in more detail, including the permissibility of rebelling against a kafir ruler

[Enfotanab]

Salaam,
I have his email address.
I have emailed him a few times in the last few years and he has always given a reply.
I had an issue not too far back and a dispute with a shia about a certain interpretation of the Quran and bought it to IH attention, he kindly put me in contact with someone very fluent in the arabic language who was quick to clear the matter up.
If someone would like to write an email I am happy to froward it on but until I have listened to the lectures on Syria I am unable to compose the email myself.
Or I can pass on his email address via mods.

I wasn't going to email him on the Syrian issue, rather, I was emailing him on the issue of rajm to have his stance clarified. I have used his website to send him the question, for offering his email bro

[XzBZB2UV]

Have any of your read aqida tahawi? It says clearly in the end that rebellion is haram alayk.

This is regarding MUSLIM RULERS, not about KUFFAR RULERS.
As explained in pretty any Islamic manual.

Alawis are kuffar.

And this is what these people are doing, rebelling, and not even for allah's sake, but for this silly western abstraction called democracy.

There are Mujahidin fighting in Syria, and not for democracy.

Traditionally the ulema said you should be patient, have sabr with the ruler, he won't live forever. Pray for a better ruler, don't rebel because what comes from that is way worse than the thulm of a tyrant.

Asad is not just a "tyrant", he's a KAFIR.

[boiffrona]

I wasn't going to email him on the Syrian issue, rather, I was emailing him on the issue of rajm to have his stance clarified. I have used his website to send him the question, for offering his email bro

Let us know the response you get.
What is the issue with rajm and what exactly has he said wrong? I have heard others mention this but never looked into the issue?

[Enfotanab]

Let us know the response you get.
What is the issue with rajm and what exactly has he said wrong? I have heard others mention this but never looked into the issue?

From what I have heard (on this forum) is that he does not believe in stoning to death for the adulterer even though there are many ahadith on the topic, and the Ulema have a consensus on it. I think he believes in lashing only. This is a problem if rajm is considered something necessarily known in the religion, the denial of which is kufr. I don't know if that IS the case but even if not, it is a massive massive mistake that needs to be corrected. It is why I have asked him to clarify his stance on it and I will post his response back on here. Apparently he is in the middle of writing a new book on dajjal so it may take some time

[Chooriwrocaey]

, he has always seemed to me of the " Everyone-USA-is-against-is-a-mujahid" type..

[TheBestCheapestOEM]

, he has always seemed to me of the " Everyone-USA-is-against-is-a-mujahid" type..

That's because he believes that America and its world order is dajjals system. So one who opposes it is the martyr who identifies dajjal while the one who is seduced by the order, has jumped into the fire of dajjal that falsely appeared as heaven..

[Quiniacab]

Does anyone know how many times the stoning of adulterers was carried out in Islamic history?

I have heard it was very rare indeed, and Rasullulah salala ho alayhi wasalam wanted people who confessed to him about it, to keep it between themselves and Allah subhana wata ala and to do tawba. We by contrast seem to want to kill people first, we talk about this as if it is one of the important fundamentals of the deen, we have been misled by the kuffar into discussing these issues as framed by them...they accuse, we defend endlessly, in the end we make it appear as if Islam is only about punishment for sexual crimes, while the much bigger crime of riba goes on everyday in front of our eyes and very few people will speak about this crime and its punishment very often.

Brother he denies rajm as death penalty. That alone would make him a misguided devil.

[Enfotanab]

Does anyone know how many times the stoning of adulterers was carried out in Islamic history?

I have heard it was very rare indeed, and Rasullulah salala ho alayhi wasalam wanted people who confessed to him about it, to keep it between themselves and Allah subhana wata ala and to do tawba. We by contrast seem to want to kill people first, we talk about this as if it is one of the important fundamentals of the deen, we have been misled by the kuffar into discussing these issues as framed by them...they accuse, we defend endlessly, in the end we make it appear as if Islam is only about punishment for sexual crimes, while the much bigger crime of riba goes on everyday in front of our eyes and very few people will speak about this crime and its punishment very often.

Yes, we all know it's difficult to establish that zina occurred and hence the punishment isn't carried out much BUT we all have to agree that the punishment exists and is commanded by the Sharia, as proven through many hadith and fataawa. The point isn't how often it is carried out, the point is whether it is mandated by the Sharia or not and it IS. So what of the one who denies it?

[boiffrona]

Brother let me know what sort of a response you would get.
For those calling him this and that, please do not back bite if someone is wrong then pray for their guidance and inform them correct them.
May Allah guide us all.