Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Assalamu alaykum |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
![]() There is a reason to be happy here. How? There is a clear polarization (along religious lines) happening over there and Muslims will want to unite more than ever ![]() “One man may hit the mark, another blunder; but heed not these distinctions. Only from the alliance of the one, working with and through the other, are great things born.” - Antoine de Saint-Exupery |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
![]() It's sad that our ulama are not out in front on this issue about Islam Karimov and quite a few other rulers in Asia. This Communists hypocrite rulers were trained and adhered to Soviet style communism. They hid their kufr when their false gods collapsed. But they rule the same way, propping up statues of themselves everywhere, promoting their kufr interpretations, repressing the masajid of Allah. Islam Karimov in particular should be declared illegitimate, or a kafir. He killed nearly 1000 men, women, children Andijan in 2005 simply for protesting him. There are likely mass graves in Andijan that will be dug up to reveal his evil once he is overthrown, insha Allah. But ulama are silent on him as they were on Bashar for years. Boiling men to death, outlawing Islam, murdering women and children, is all okay for Uzbekistan? Naqshbandi 'alim' joining with Islam Karimov |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Muslims find it easy to ban other religions so why the double standard when islam itself is banned. Maybe he's trying to be progressive and catch up to the modern world,and he thinks Islam is but a hinderence. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Muslims find it easy to ban other religions so why the double standard when islam itself is banned. Maybe he's trying to be progressive and catch up to the modern world,and he thinks Islam is but a hinderence. Islam does not ban other religions. If Islam banned other religions there would be no Hindus in India or Christians in the Arab world. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Abdul1234 may be you are right about them.
I knew about indirectly about paid agents on internet. US soldiers threw a puppy from a cliff. After some time there were many videos on YT with similar title but no real content. The strategy was clear - put so many fake videos so that any casual user does not get to the real one. Honest Americans. I found this when Wiki Leaks exploded on their head. I was on net when it was happening real time. I searched on YT and there a very short video with all the relevant tags but it had no relevant video content. After few minutes there was another video by the same user with the same tags and different but still irrelevant video content. His user location was India. After few minutes two more similar videos appeared with equally comprehensive tags but useless content. This time the user was from Malayasia - in all probability it was the same person. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Abdul1234 may be you are right about them. but in areas where it suits them the US military may be running public relations and propaganda work using the same techniques, I remember hearing some time ago that the American government had spent quite a lot of money buying specialist computer programs that allow users to have multiple fake online identities, hiding things that embarrass them wish to using fake yahoo videos etc would no doubt be easy for them US MILITARY BUYS FAKE ONLINE IDENTITIES The U.S. Military has purchased software designed to create and control false online personas in an attempt to use social media and other websites to counter anti-U.S. messaging. According to the contract between US Central Command (Centcom) and California company Ntrepid, the software would let each user control 10 personas, each "replete with background, history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographically consistent." The software would also be able to let personas "appear to originate in nearly any part of the world" and interact through "conventional online services and social media platforms," while using a static IP address for each persona to maintain a consistent online identity. These false online personas, also known as "sock puppets," would be equipped to seem like real people while entering online discussion through blogs, message boards, chats, and more. With a false persona, a user could discredit opponents, or create the semblance of consensus. Centcom spokesman Commander Bill Speaks told The Guardian that the software "supports classified blogging activities on foreign-language websites to enable Centcom to counter violent extremist and enemy propaganda outside the US." The technology would not be used in America, or by American owned companies--which include major social media sites like Facebook and Twitter. "We do not target U.S. audiences, and we do not conduct these activities on sites owned by U.S. companies," Speaks told the Washington Times. At a senate hearing March 1, Centcom commander James N. Mattis said, "Our enemies operate within cyberspace (and its associated relevant physical infrastructure) to plan, coordinate, recruit, train, equip, execute and garner support for operations against the U.S., its allies and interests. Clearly, in the information age, our military must adapt to this new domain of warfare." The online persona project is thought to fall under the domain of Operation Earnest Voice, which oversees Centcom's Information Operations, and in the words of Mattis, "seeks to ........ counter extremist ideology and propaganda." from the Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_837153.html I don't really know the US governments attitude towards the Deobandis, but I know that elements of the UK Government and chattering classes are persistently trying to class them as extremists (which is of course very unfair). As Sunniforum is largely frequented by Deobandis, who knows, it may one day even be a target of US government 'socks' if they start to take a similar intolerant view? |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
And then they ask, "Why do they hate us?" |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|