[Grorointeri]

Western Elites Secretly Still Building Islam?

#############
http://thedailybell.com/1691/Western...ing-Islam.html
##############

It is clear that what is currently taking place in Tunisia is not a popular revolution. There were no clear demands from the demonstrators, there was no organized opposition leading the masses, and even Islamic voices have so far been silent. [The fact that there was no full scale revolution] is a positive sign...so what actually happened, and led to President Ben Ali going into exile? Of course, this pressing question will continue to be asked during the coming phase, and may take a long time to answer, considering that we are now facing conflicting information, and Tunisia remains a country that is somewhat ‘closed' towards almost all of the Arab world, and its media. Our satellite channels seemed uninterested in reporting genuine facts. – India's Issy

Dominant Social Theme: The Muslims are coming and must be confronted. Never mind that we provide the funding.

Free-Market Analysis: Is the war on terror a success? The Anglo-American elite needs an enemy if the authoritarianism that is rising in the West is to continue – because despotism (and globalism) is more easily created when there is an outside enemy. But fighting against 100 Al Qaeda soldiers in Afghanistan is not anybody's idea of a substantive threat. And the Taliban are evidently and obviously fighting an occupying force.

What if the powers-that-be had decided to do what they could to expand the Muslim threat – and thus expand (in the Western mind anyway) the specter of resurgent, militant Islam? A cynical idea isn't it, dear reader. It is merely speculation, but there are reasons to explore it further. Bear with us.

Just yesterday, the Bell offered an article that was somewhat skeptical of the "Jasmine Revolution" playing out in Tunisia. Since we presented our speculation others have weighed in (in the Blogosphere) with even more cynical perspectives. There have been reports that the Tunisian revolution was actually a CIA-related operation related to securing oil supplies for the US and furthering its strategic dominance in terms of the larger "great game."

We believe such explanations are somewhat overwrought. The CIA does not call every tune. Oil in fact is present everywhere on earth and need not be secured by the West via revolution. The Tunisians evidently and obviously were not well-disposed to their (former) iron-handed ruler. And yet ... revolutions can be manipulated and often are. In fact, Tunisia's now-deposed president President Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali was firmly anti-Muslim and thus the Tunisian revolution seems to fit into a larger pattern of further Muslim-ifcation of that part of the world.

Is it a deliberate pattern? We would argue it might be, and that it is one that now serves the purposes of Western powers-that-be. The Anglosphere is notoriously unsentimental when it comes to overthrowing allies in pursuit of its large one-world objectives. Those who have ruled with America's backing for decades may suddenly they are unsupported in their further prospects.

Where is the evidence? Again, we note the pattern. In the strife-torn West African nation of Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) the West is supporting Alassane Ouattara, a former prime minister, banker and leader of the opposition over incumbent president, Laurent Gbagbo. Ouattara is Muslim; Gbagbo is Christian. The West advocates for the Muslim-linked faction over the Christian one.

Then there is the referendum in the Sudan, one of Africa's largest states and most Northern ones. The referendum, being conducted on the auspices of the United Nations, aims to split the country, creating a predominantly Muslim Northern Sudan. According to CNN, President Omar al-Bashir has reportedly said that if Southern Sudan votes in favor of separation, "sharia will become the main source of Sudan's Constitution, Islam the state religion and Arabic the official language." The West, under the auspices of the UN, is in the process of creating a fundamentalist Muslim state. Finally, there is the sorry saga of the War in Kosova in which the West backed Albanian Muslims over Serbian Christians.

All three of these examples might be termed "simplistic" in that there were (and are) many complexities involved in these confrontations that have nothing to do with religious affiliation. Nonetheless – inarguably – on three separate occasions, Western powers-that-be have thrown their weight behind Islam. Coincidence?

There is more to support the idea that the Anglosphere is covertly supporting resurgent Islam. The West has surely manipulated the price of oil to enrich Muslim countries for decades. And in return, Saudi Arabia has first created and then funded Wahhabism, a fierce fundamental strain of Islam that has found fertile soil in the Afghan-Pakistan region and in North Africa. Thus, we seem to see again that the West is funding the very enemies its leaders claim to be fighting against.

Dubai and the Arab Emirates should be mentioned within this paradigm. These Western-affiliated, Muslim countries have in our view been positioned to provide a "middle ground" between Islam and the West. They represent the fruition of an ongoing Hegelian dialectic – the model for a Westernized Islam. Al Jazeera is funded out of another tiny, Western-centric country, Qatar, and we have noted that initially Al Jazeera was staffed by BBC journos; Al Jazeera, far from being a radical Islamic mouthpiece, is in a sense another Western-controlled news outlet. You can see a previous article here:

http://www.thedailybell.com/383/Al-J...S-cities-.html

Those in the West, even close mainstream observers of the ongoing "war on terror," live with this cognitive dissonance without showing much consciousness of it – which is strange itself. You would think those with degrees and pedigrees in this area would ask themselves why the West is supporting the world's leading promoters of militant Islam all the while proclaiming undying resistance to "terrorists."

The Western power elite always utilizes the Hegelian dialectic – the creation of two sides to an argument so that the resolution is resolved as much as possible on elite terms. But while most observers of the elite believe the dialectic applies to rhetoric, the facts-on-the-ground show us clearly that the dialectic is applied to conflict as well. Thus, there is significant evidence that Wall Street funded the "Red" faction of the Russian revolution that led to the formation of the USSR and the USSR in turn helped fund the creation of Communist China.

It is now well-acknowledged that Operation Gladio in Europe (a CIA black ops) produced a slew of violent incidents and rising fear among Western middle classes that the "Red Plague" was spreading. This was no doubt helpful in the creation of the meme of a "united Europe" that would provide an antidote to violence.

Of course today Europe is "united" – but that unification only seems to spawned yet more violence – and this is possibly a larger problem. Wars and revolution in the Internet era are not nearly so controllable as they once were. The risk is that having begun the conflagration and now perhaps encouraging its growth, the elite will end up burning itself, though how badly remains to be seen.

Conclusion: We are proposing a new stage in the manipulated war on terror. Having built up the Middle East through enormous cash infusions, the Anglosphere is continually expanding the role of fundamental Islam and may even be prepared to overthrow old and trusted allies to do so. The war on terror so far has not proven very terrible (except to Afghan and Iraqi citizens) but if the Jasmine revolution "spreads" throughout the Middle East, resurgent, fundamentalist Islam may indeed become a reality. All this is highly speculative of course and merely an exercise analyzing elite promotions. The reality may be far more mundane – and simply the result of current events with no additional resonance or meaning. And yet ..

[Grorointeri]

Osama bin Laden ? Hero ? or , useful idiot ? or dupe ? Check these two versions of his biography -- official ( published in bankers-controlled media ) and unofficial.

##########
http://www.thedailybell.com/2722/Osama-bin-Laden
###########

Who was he: Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden is said to be the founder of al-Qaeda, the jihadist organization accused of having been responsible for the September 11 attacks on the United States and other large-scale attacks on civilian and military targets. Bin Laden was a part of the wealthy Saudi-based bin Laden family.

The founder of the clan, Mohammed bin Laden, was a native of southern Yemen and emigrated to Saudi Arabia at the beginning of the 20th century to set up a construction company. He became wealthy as a result of a franchise extended to him by the government to build religious structures in Saudi Arabia.

Osama bin Laden, one of dozens of children, became involved in the war in Afghanistan when the USSR invaded. It was then, apparently, that bin Laden became involved with the CIA, which was helping train and equip the resistance. They called the group being assembled al-Qaeda, or "the base."

The relationship apparently blossomed and bin Laden – under an assumed name – traveled to America where he recruited for "the base." Some of this recruiting was done in California; bin Laden also worked out of a mosque in Brooklyn.

Eventually, bin Laden returned to Afghanistan and according to the CIA and other official intelligence sources became radicalized – not just against the USSR, but against the West, as well. Bin Laden began to carry out armed actions against America and reportedly plotted the 9/11.

Eventually, Osama bin Laden was put on the American Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) lists of the Ten Most Wanted Fugitives and Most Wanted Terrorists for his involvement in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings. However, he was never listed by the FBI as wanted for the September 11th attacks.

From 2001 to 2011, bin Laden was a target of the War on Terror. He remained in hiding until May 2, 2011 when bin Laden was supposedly shot and killed in a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by US Navy SEALs. Bin Laden's body was immediately buried at sea. Al-Qaeda has vowed to retaliate.

This is the official version.

Another version – one more in line with directed history – claims that the CIA built Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda up from the remains of the resistance to the USSR. They did so to create a portable enemy that they could place anywhere in the world. The idea was to generate a pretext for attacking countries and individuals that were resistant to the planned one world order.

Bin Laden, in this version, was never an enemy of the US, did not participate in 9/11 and died of kidney failure in 2001, as reported in Egyptian and Pakistani newspapers. His name and background have been twisted for intelligence purposes. Like Hitler, bin Laden has been turned into the Enemy. He is a phantasmagorical construct, not a real one.

Background: Osama bin Laden came from a wealthy family intimately connected to the Saudi royal family. The bin Laden family is extraordinarily wealthy, having provided much of the construction for Saudi Arabia's mosques and other infrastructure. The financial interests of the bin Laden family are concentrated in the Saudi Binladin Group, grossing some US$5 billion annually.

[Grorointeri]

The bankers have a long history of using gullible Western citizens as useful idiots. Check this.

#############
http://www.henrymakow.com/a_self-app...e_that_hu.html

#############

The Left, including the communists have generally served as the useful idiots of international capital ... The Left, whether in its Fabian, communist or New Left varieties has been appropriated by the system it is supposedly exposing.






by Kerry Bolton
(henrymakow.com)



A self-appointed elite that Huxley called the 'World Controllers' and Caroll Quiqley described as 'an international network' has for generations been intent on establishing a 'World State' (Huxley) or what David Rockefeller calls a 'World Order' and and what President George W. Bush and others ...call the 'New World Order.'

In more common parlance it is called 'globalization' but it is seldom understood in its wider ramifications, as set forth here, especially by the Left, whose activists support aspects of the same globalization process: multiculturalism, feminism, marijuana liberalization, abortion rights, open borders, and feel-good causes in the name of democracy and 'human rights,' the results of which are further control by the global plutocracy.

The Left, including the communists have generally served as the useful idiots of international capital ... The Left, whether in its Fabian, communist or New Left varieties has been appropriated by the system it is supposedly exposing. A post- New Left has emerged since the dissolution of the Soviet Bloc, and takes the form of the so-called 'color revolutions' under the patronage of the Soros network, and others.

The strategy used by the international oligarchy is the same as that more generally recognized as being a major element in Marxist doctrine; namely dialectics, the conflict of opposing forces that generates a synthesis. This dialecto method is something that Sutton realized when he was trying to understand why the oligarchy so often seems to be backing opposing ideologies, governments, and policies.

The Marxist dialecticians stated that history is engaged in a process towards world communism that would arise out of the conflict of capitalism and socialism. The oligarchs, on the other hand, apparently operate on the dialectical premise that what will result from their "controlled conflict" will be a socialist-capitalist synthesis which we might call the "World Collectivist State;" a world order that will be Communistic in organization but run by oligarchs rather than commissars. Aaron Russo, after talking with Nick Rockefeller, alluded to this as "selling socialism as capitalism."

Over the past few generations, the "crises scenarios" used by the oligarchs to sell or impose their plan of a World Collectivist State have included the problems of war, famine, overpopulation, disparity between the wealth of the so-called "North" and "South" , and in our present time "the war on terrorism" (perpetual conflict) and the threat of "global warming."

In general, it can be stated that many of these problems are the direct result of the debt-finance, trade and economic system that is operated by the oligarchs. Now the oligarchs present themselves as the solvers of the problems of their own making. A global "pincer movement" of agitation from "below" (the "Left") and manipulation from "above" (the "oligarchs") dialectically operates to shift the center of mass political gravity towards an acceptance of, if not support for, a World State to end the crises that have been created by our self-appointed "world saviors."


--
This is the conclusion of "Revolution From Above" by Kerry Bolton published by Arktos.

[Grorointeri]

More insight
######
To Love or Hate --- Know your enemy

by Fritz Springmeier

In this article I hope to provide the reader with many specific (and often little known) details concerning the creation of what may evolve into an actual third world war. The latest manufactured crisis has already taken on global proportions.


This article has been written in response to people repeatedly asking me, “Are we headed for W.W. III?” This is a valid question considering Osama bin Laden has been circulating the manuscript of his unpublished book (which he wrote) entitled America and the Third World War. For years, I have been looking beyond the theatrical symbols of the world’s movers and shakers and examining the underlying realities. These global elite would not dare let you know their plans, but I will provide you with more details so that you might know your enemy, for whether you chose to love or hate your enemy you need to know them.

I will organize this information into two parts:

A. THE OUTLINE OF THINGS
B. DETAILS OF SPECIFICS, first Osama bin Laden, & then second, the creation of a viable Moslem threat.



THE OUTLINE OF THINGS



In my intense study of the world’s elite, I have come to realize a profound truth; these men know how to control humans by directing the way the human mind likes to think. Their methods to mind control are not so much to conquer the mind, but to direct its natural paths of thinking in the direction they want it to go. If you understand this principle it will help you understand how the natural desires of Muslims, Christians, secular Corporations, Jews, Palestinians, Americans, British, Afghanis, Iraqis, etc. are being manipulated into a large confrontation, a confrontation that was planned even before Jewish immigrants began to pour into Palestine to create Islam’s first big sore spot called “al-Naqba” (Islam’s “Holocaust” in Palestine).


Before providing the details, allow me to give the bigger pictures. The present crisis was originally planned in the 19th century. The script for the crisis called for an incredible theater of puppets. The goal is the elimination of fundamental religions, Christianity and Islam, and the control and the enslavement of planet earth. The WTC attack is the tip of the iceberg to this manufactured crisis, and the beginning of more sad events. This is the biggest picture.


The Moslem world has had a predictable pattern with the west (European culture). In fact there is a book, which provides Muslim country by Muslim country, year by year, the history of how this cycle has occurred. The Moslem world goes through a cycle, one phase is where its adopts technology and liberty from the west and then the other phase is where it rejects what is foreign and goes back into Islamic fundamentalism. Different areas of the Moslem world are at different phases at any given time. The Moslem world has usually not had all of its territories in the same phase at the same time. The world’s movers and shakers have aggravated and manipulated this natural cyclic pattern.


Carroll Quigley, the famous establishment historian writes in Tragedy & Hope in 1966,

“The destructive impact of Western Civilization upon so many other societies rests on its ability to demoralize their ideological and spiritual culture as much as its ability to destroy them in a material sense with firearms…. It is possible that new civilizations may be born in the debris from the civilizations wrecked by Western Civilization… In this wreckage is debris from Islamic, Hindu, Chinese and Japanese civilizations…. The birth of a powerful civilization at any or several of these points… would serve as a counterbalance to the expansion of Soviet Civilization on the land mass of Eurasia.”

(Tragedy & Hope, p. 14)

Quigley had a sense of what the elite were doing. He predicted that Western Civilization and Russia would be challenged by a rising Asian civilization by 2000, which turns out to be Islamic fundamentalism. (Ibid. p. 21) While the politicians of the world allow themselves to look incompetent, the movers and shakers (the puppeteers) know in a very detailed way what they are doing and the effects that their actions are causing. The West’s leadership has had very detailed studies about the Islamic world and what the impact of certain actions will have.


Their detailed plans have been repeatedly leaked in vague ways to the unsuspecting public. For instance, H.G. Wells, one of their Fabian Socialist-Masonic-Illuminati prophets, in his film “Things to Come” made in the late 1930’s, shows delta-winged planes (resembling stealth fighter-bombers) flying over Iraq’s oil fields to bomb.

*

Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Sudan were used as incubators to create fierce Moslem fundamentalist Jihad warriors.
*

Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other spots were used to create incidents that would fuel natural passions.

When one realizes that the non-Islamic leaders (i.e. the U.K., U.S., USSR etc.) who subtly helped create these incidents had advisors who knew totally well how these incidents would create Islamic fundamentalism, it is impossible not to realize that the catalyst that created Moslem fundamentalism turns out to be the global elite themselves.


Of course, Islamic fundamentalism is a natural reaction to the modernization, secularization, and corruption that is accelerating in what is termed “the West” (European civilization). Such a strong reaction to the sinfulness of the West has taken place that the Sunni and Shiite fundamentalists are in full collaboration. Devout Christians who hold to wholesome family values, freedom from global corporate tyranny, and the destruction of communities are also having some similar “reactionary” reactions to the New World Order. Christian fundamentalists turn to the Bible and Biblical law, and the Moslem of course turns to the Koran and its Sharia (Islamic law). The trick of the elite is to harness those natural reactions to destroy their opposition. This is why both the Christian Patriot movement and the Islamic fundamentalists are infiltrated with agent provocateurs who will encourage both groups to run to their own destruction.


The elite are not above actually stepping in and taking leadership of their opposition. This is why George Hunt discovered that the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and other leading capitalists were leaders of the UNSED environmental activities. This is why the anti-big corporation movement that rioted in Seattle against the WTO, has its share of connections back to the elite. This is why many of the leaders of Islamic fundamentalism have ties back to powerful rich Capitalists or Communists. (Communism has been a great front for the elite.) While I am not attacking the concerns of the Islamic fundamentalists, I am pointing out that their leaders are tainted with puppet strings. Moslems have threatened me in the past for being so frank.


As an example of someone who heralds himself as a third alternative to capitalism and communism and yet has ties to both is Col Qaddafi of Libya. Without outside help he would not survive in power. I personally noticed that Col. Qaddafi of Libya maintained his popularity with his people because he came into power at the same time that big oil money flowed into Libya. He was able to associate himself in the eyes of his people with prosperity. Rich capitalists, (such as the Bush family, the Rockefellers, the Royalty of England and the Netherlands, to name just a few) are behind the oil companies. Americans have operated the oil fields that provided Quaddaffi the money to remain popular with his people. Behind those Americans technicians were Capitalists who controlled or even became political figures.


The script calls for a primary “bad guy”, in this case Bin Laden, who like other modern “bad” guys, actually is quite popular with fundamentalist Muslims. Actually a number of bad guys have been created, and we will examine some of the details of these. The puppet strings of many of the leaders of around the world can be discerned by looking at their affiliations, their training, their genealogies, their fraternal memberships and their actions. These puppet strings ultimately go back to the global elite. For instance, the elite here in America verbalized to each other how pleased they were with Saddam Hussein’s destruction of things.


Islamic fundamentalists would say that Allah is responsible. If the West’s leaders had seriously wanted to halt the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, they had the ability to do so, but they added fuel to the fire at each step. My point is that the rise of fundamentalism is being encouraged and manipulated.

*

How convenient for Israel that Iran has its religious revolution and then goes to war with Iraq.
*

How convenient for all the corporations in the West and the Soviet Union that supplied materials for the long war and the attempts to rebuild after the war.
*

How convenient for those who made profits off of oil and gas and opium.
*

Follow the money of Moslem terrorists, the CIA, the Illuminati elite, and the rich Gulf Arabs and you will find much of it met at the infamous BCCI. (Bank of Credit and Commerce International)

The fall of the West’s puppet Shah of Iran was actually not a surprise to the elite. They had decided to let him fall. He had been empowered by America’s CIA, and then abandoned when the time was ripe for a strong reaction. The man who replaced him, the Ayatollah Khomeini was British MI6. And tying together Saudi intelligence, Saddam Hussein’s intelligence and Egyptian intelligence (and previously the Shah’s CIA-led SAVAK) is a group called the Safari Club set up by French espionage. When you are aware of these kind of things, then you realize the insidious deceptive nature of this script. Different puppets, one script.


Look at the Moslem leaders like Jordan’s King Hussein. He married an American and was a Freemason. The Shah of Iran’s father was put into power by the British, and is descended from an old Jewish bloodline. The Shah joined a Catholic Military Order in 1958, and Jordan’s King Hussein joined the Catholic Military Order of the Golden Spur in 1964. And then some of the Moslem leaders are Sufis. Syria’s leader Assad, who is also a Freemason, maintains secret ties with Syrian-born Jews from Aleppo who are one of the groups plotting the Temple Mount conspiracy to build a Temple in Jerusalem. All these men have allegiances beyond Islam.


The Muslim world views itself as a single entity. This is embodied in the term pan-Islamism, which transcends nationalism. However, in my travels in the Middle East, I saw first hand that most Muslims also have allegiances to clans, language groups, nations, ideologies and sects. The West and Russia have meddled in the affairs of the Moslem world most of the 19th and 20th century, and have tried to work the different allegiances of the Moslem world to their own advantage. The Soviet Union took a very active role in helping to create Greater Syria & a Greater Israel. The New Right in Israeli politics was KGB controlled. The West managed to interject itself smack into the middle of the Moslem world, and there is a great deal of tension in the Moslem world about this. They feel that their civilization will not be safe until they eject the West (with its control and influence) from the middle of their territory.



DETAILS

first, Bin Laden, and second, the creation of a viable Moslem threat


Now let’s look at the script’s top Bad guy Osama bin Laden. Osama bin Laden’s family was on the inside track with the House of al-Saud of Saudi Arabia. Anyone who has had the opportunity to bump into Saudi princes here in America or Europe is well aware of their enormous appetites for immoral behavior. The King and Princes of Saudi Arabia have been provided any perversion they wanted by the West’s elite. As a young man, Osama bin Laden was cut from the same cloth.



He loved fornication, alcohol and the pleasures of sin. Some of his brothers and sisters live in the United States, mostly in the Boston, MA area. He doesn’t come from some poor Palestinian family that has suffered from Israeli tyranny. Instead he comes from a family that has tasted what the West has to offer. He has tasted of the sins that are associated with the West and has rejected that life. It’s sad that that is the view of America that so many see. While the Bible Belt and America’s traditional spiritual values are mocked and scorned by the establishment media, the liberal values that Hollywood treasures are in turn scorned by the militants who hate their intrusion into the Moslem world.


Osama bin Laden had several religious experiences, and turned his back on wealth and the life of sin. Even though he was a successful businessman with a university education, he lives the life of a warrior monk, along with his 4 wives and fifteen children. (No small responsibility, especially since each wife according to Moslem standards should be treated equally.) He has been reported to live in a cave with no running water. (His forces are also headquartered in remote deep well protected caves.) He has turned his back on the easy life, and technology and is waging a war against the non-Islamic world. Since America is the top power in the non-Islamic world and very active interfering in the affairs of the Moslem world, America has captured his negative attention.


Christians have long tried to tell secular Americans that the life of sin was an empty life. It is no surprise that Osama bin Laden lost interest in it. Osama bin Laden rediscovered his religious roots in medieval Afghanistan when he led their freedom fighters against the infidel Russians. He said, “One day in Afghanistan was like one thousand days of praying in an ordinary mosque.” This is similar to the Baptism of Fire that the Christians talk about, which purges the weak sinner of what is insignificant in life and gets the pilgrim down to the real fundamentals of life, one’s spiritual roots. I’m not saying that bin Laden found the right roots, but he certainly found the spiritual roots of Islam, which included Jihad against the infidel.


Besides Osama bin Laden, over 20,000 other Arabs traveled to Afghanistan to join in the holy war against the Russians. Pakistan and Afghanistan became the crucible where these individuals were turned into warriors with a kamikaze martyr spirit and the training and experience to make them deadly. Our CIA helped supply them. The Russians provided one side of the hellish fight; America helped provide the other, and out of the conflict comes a closely bonded experienced group of radical Moslem warriors. And Osama bin Laden was down in the trenches with them, sharing their dangers, and poor food. And the American elite’s House of al-Saud helped finance Osama bin Laden & the other Arab volunteers (mujahideen) from all over the Moslem world.


There were two events had great impact on Moslem terrorism. One was done by the United States, the other by Russia.

*

America’s contribution was the “al-Azma” (literally Arab for “crisis”). The crisis was the American desecration of Saudi soil during Desert Shield/Storm. All of the Saudi religious leaders were against allowing the infidel American troops into Saudi Arabia. The global elite, as well as the House of Saud, knew that the Moslem world would be outraged for years, and they were.


*

The Russian contribution was to carry out the covert sabotage of a C-130 plane carrying Pakistan’s President Zia-ul-Haq on Aug. 17, 1988. His replacement, Benazir Bhutto, made it national Pakistani policy to support militant Islamic fundamentalists. Pakistan gave out special “tourist” visas and airline tickets were given out to Moslems who wanted to join the militant fundamentalists in their Pakistani training camps. Kosovo Albanians and Bosnian Moslems were some of those who came. They didn’t come to liberate Afghanistan. They came to create militant Moslem groups in their own countries.

Another Russian contribution to things was Gulbaddin Hekmatiyar, a Muslim leader who they controlled, and who led one of the factions of Afghan resistance. His contribution was to fight other resistance groups and weaken the original Afghan mujahideen forces.


Next, it was Pakistan (still supported by the U.S.) who encouraged the Afghan mujahideen to carry out a large-scale conventional offensive against the fortress Jalalabad. In a fashion similar to the how the Viet Cong (southerners) were eliminated by the Tet offensive, and then the NVA (northerners) had complete control, the Afghani rebels lost large numbers of men, and were replaced by Pakistan’s Taliban mujahideen force.


We can then see how through a series of actions encouraged by outside influences, the original Afghan forces were decimated and the fundamentalist Taliban, who were foreigners, could take over. In a sense, Afghanistan was still an occupied country; they traded the occupation by the Russians for the occupation of the Taliban.


In 1989, after the war, Bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia as a popular war hero. He was popular with the Saudi Royal family, with whom he was still very close friends. He was also close to Saudi intelligence. Since the Saudi Royal family is clearly reprobate spiritually, by any standards, it is difficult to rationalize Bin Laden’s loyalty to them, and to seriously continue to believe he genuinely believed in the tenets of Islam. Unless perhaps he has multiple personalities, which may well be the case. Bin Laden is now titled as Sheikh bin Laden, and is very respected across the Moslem world.



THE CREATION OF A VIABLE MOSLEM WAR THREAT



While an explanation of how this threat was created will not eliminate it, it is useful for us to learn how the bad guys’ threat was created. The bad guys in the script had to have a viable dangerous army or threat. It has taken billions of dollars and countless wars and machinations by the global elite to finally get the fundamental Moslems to the point that they are both angry and a real threat.


In 1991, after the Afghan war wound down, the militant Moslem fundamentalists shifted from Pakistan to the Sudan. Iran contributed to this shift. The training of hard-core fighters occurred in numerous countries, but the center of activity shifted to Africa.


Anyway, prior to the Afghan War, the Moslem world lacked a large trained international cadre of dedicated warriors committed to fundamentalism. The Afghan war provided the perfect setting with which to create the hard core international Moslem cadre to create a third world war. It was the perfect setting because the United States, which protects Israel, could (without the contradiction looking too obvious) supply and assist these Moslem fundamentalists, and Russia could provide a technologically superior super-power for them to train against. I realize that most people reading this will not realize the enormous cultural-technological gap that has existed between the Arab world and the West. To put it bluntly, these people were riding donkeys and camels a few years ago, and living in medieval cultures. The ways of organizing things, of openness, and education that we take for granted were foreign to them.



The establishment press has done a poor job of showing this cultural gap. In order to create a credible threat to the West, the Moslem world has had to receive an incredible amount of help from the West and Russia. This incredible amount of assistance from the West and Russia finally began to show some successful results during the 1990’s. Even then the gap between the two cultures is enormous. I write this from first hand observations, as well as from the observations of numerous others who have shared their experiences.


By the way, this is not the first time America played both sides of a conflict. During the six-day war of June 1967, the CIA provided the Egyptians important intelligence on the Israeli’s ongoing Order of Battle via the USS Liberty spy ship sailing near the battle in order to make the war more equal. The Israeli’s sank the U.S. spy ship. Since Israel and the U.S. call each other an ally, they both covered up the sordid affair.


During the 1990’s, these militant fundamentalists trained in Afghanistan have been using terrorism to gain control over the rest of the Moslem world and to extend Moslem control over the sub-Saharan and East African areas. The Somalian fiasco where hundreds of American Rambos almost got annihilated at Mogadishu was an extension of the new strength the Moslems gained from the spread of the trained militants. The defeat of America in Somalia convinced the Moslem militants that they could defeat America in other countries.


During the 1980’s and the 1990’s a large number of Moslem successes against Russia, Israel, and the United States have breathed a new spirit into the militant Moslems. This impact of these successes can’t be overstated. For instance, the Intifadah was only possible after the Palestinians regained their self-respect from a successful commando raid into Israel which used hang gliders. After losing war after war with Israel and the West, the Moslems had begun to doubt their abilities. Their successes worldwide that have occurred since Russia invaded Afghanistan have changed all that. That confidence is going to be crucial to sustain any credible world war.


Are we entering into a war similar to the Vietnam War, except that this time it will be continental (and perhaps global) rather than against a single nation? An example of how widespread the fighting is already is the Philippines. Militant Islamic Fundamentalists are fighting there. Both Iran and Iraq work with Bin Laden. Do the Muslim forces have enough of a military and terrorist threat to really create a third world war? It is clear that just as the elite quietly supplied Hitler’s war machine before and during W.W. II, the elite are going to continue to supply both sides to continue this war between Moslem fundamentalists and the West. The United States military has even provided training for some of the Moslems here in the United States. The Kosovo Liberation Army is connected to the Militant Moslems, and yet it was assisted during the Kosovo crisis by the Americans.


Where will the next major terrorist strike be? What kind of weapon will be used next? How far will the war spread? As things continue to deteriorate, we can expect more Moslem countries to become militant. The entire Moslem world is in a state of flux. Militant Moslems live in all over Europe. Chechnya is part of the militant Moslem network, and events are tossing Russia and the U.S. together as allies again. The level of Moslem abilities to carry out terrorist acts is impressive. Besides extensive training in the use of aircraft as vehicles of terrorism, extensive work has taken place to create a cadre of trained martyrs who can carry suitcase nukes into areas.


While it looks great on paper that America can launch a $600,000 cruise missile with pinpoint accuracy, the effect of some expensive cruise missile hitting a mud building in Afghanistan is less impressive. America is infatuated with its military toys, but a few B-1s and B-2 Spirit bombers are not going to impress a hardened group of warriors who have already faced everything the Soviet Union could dish out. This “war” doesn’t seem to be well thought out. It seems to setting the stage for more trouble. In America’s haste to do something, it looks like Bush will be just as effective as Carter and Clinton were against radical Moslems. The threat from Moslem terrorism is more dangerous because the United States still thinks like it did when it fought North Vietnam.


For instance, during that war, the Vietnamese successfully used tunnel systems. The Moslem fundamentalists have spent energy learning how to copy those successful Vietnamese tunnel systems. Even our B-52 bombers had limited success against the Vietnamese’s tunnel systems, and our high technology failed. Our best weapon against the tunnels turned out to be small men called tunnel rats armed with knives. It seems that many of the same high tech American attitudes that had limited success in Vietnam are being brought out again. Dropping bombs on people is not the solution to the Moslem fundamentalists. It makes Americans feel good, but what are these expensive cruise missiles really accomplishing?


Our approach to solving our difficulties with Moslem fundamentalism is seriously lacking.

*

Why are our leaders setting us up for failure?
*

Who is going to benefit from this long war?
*

What kind of alternatives could be creatively developed to back out of this mess?

As usual, the elite have done their job well in creating this crisis. They prefer to develop these problems so that only one plan of action makes sense, and then they stampede us that direction before we can think of anything else.


What we have covered in this article are some of the details tracing the creation of today’s war between the U.S.A. and her allies and militant Moslem Fundamentalists. Some will call the evolution of hostilities accidental, or the fault of reckless indifference by incompetent politicians. But the strings of the puppets are visible if you look close.


The unfolding of events look like scripts that were discussed years ago. It is obvious, that whatever caused this “war” has happened and now we have the problem of how to end it. But like a disease, we can treat the symptom or the cause, and in this case, the war is a symptom of a larger problem

[Grorointeri]

Democracy is a charade. Sure, we can decide where the sewers will go, but the big issues have been taken out of our hands. All the politicians are Freemasons: Ron Paul, Obama, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum.

They divide into a House League, with certain Masons taking the Right, and other Masons taking the Left. The people are polarized, distracted and deceived. No one sees the puppet master. Nothing fundamental ever changes.

Left Vs. Right : Two apparently opposing forces advancing the same goal, a thinly veiled world police state ruled by satanist billionaires.

The same applies to the international stage: Islamists Vs. Zionists: Both Masons.


###########
http://www.henrymakow.com/ten_signs_...nically_p.html

##########

Humanity is Satanically Possessed

A Satanic cult has colonized the earth.
This is the key to understanding
history and avoiding the pitfalls of modern "cult--ure."

by Henry Makow Ph.D.


If you wish to escape the ravages of modern life, understand that
mankind is satanically possessed. We are being inducted into the lowest ranks of a satanic cult, the Illuminati.

I am not speaking from a Christian or Biblical perspective. I am from a secular background. The difference is that I recognize, in secular terms, that God is the magnificent moral and natural order governing the universe.

The prevalent Illuminist denial of God is a satanic rebellion that ultimately cannot be won.

Our satanic possession is the product of a highly organized long-term conspiracy to establish a "New World Order." Today, the cancer has spread to all social institutions, public and private, including charities and the church. As a result, humanity has fallen into a coma, hardly able to recognize the sickness, let alone resist.

As I have said, the mainspring of this diabolical conspiracy is the Cabalist (Illuminati) dynastic families who own the world's central banks. Their control of most large corporations, especially media, and consequently politicians ensures that their cancer is all pervasive.

Here are just some logos with Illuminati motifs. Politicians and entertainers adore making the sign of Baphomet and the Masonic handshake.

The instrument of this secret control is Freemasonry, a Cabalist secret Society. (The Illuminati is a secret society within Freemasonry.) Essentially you will rise in Freemasonry and society according to your willingness to serve Lucifer, and betray your community to the new Luciferian dispensation.

DEMOCRACY

Democracy is a charade. Sure, we can decide where the sewers will go, but the big issues have been taken out of our hands. All the politicians are Freemasons: Ron Paul, Obama, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum.

They divide into a House League, with certain Masons taking the Right, and other Masons taking the Left. The people are polarized, distracted and deceived. No one sees the puppet master. Nothing fundamental ever changes.

Left Vs. Right : Two apparently opposing forces advancing the same goal, a thinly veiled world police state ruled by satanist billionaires.

The same applies to the international stage: Islamists Vs. Zionists: Both Masons.

Nothing illustrates our peril better than 9-11. Essentially the Illuminati bankers through their Masonic proxies murdered over 3000 Americans in broad daylight and got away with it.

This mass trauma brainwashing was designed to justify foreign wars and a domestic police state. It could not have succeeded without the collaboration of the mass media and virtually the whole political elite, who are an occupying power, a colonial administration.

The essence of Satanism is to turn the natural and moral order upside down i.e. "revolution."

God is Reality. Satanism turns reality on its head.

Thus, the good is made to appear evil and vice-versa. Lies have the authority of truth. The Truth can never be known. It is a matter of perception. It is whatever the Illuminati say it is.

Beautiful is ugly and ugly is considered beautiful. What is healthy and natural (e.g. marriage, family, heterosexuality) is painted as unhealthy while what is sick (e.g. homosexuality) is presented as natural and healthy.

These examples of our satanic possession should be seen in this light:

1. The divorce of sex from love, marriage and procreation. The promotion of anonymous sex in place of courtship degrades all human contact to the level of sex appeal. Anonymous sex is hyped as the best experience in life.

Pornography, the sex addicts' cocaine, is made widely available. 70-80% of teenage boys watch online porn regularly. Girls need to behave like porn stars to be loved. The sexualization of children takes place and eventually, acceptance of pedophilia. In Japan, porn is killing heterosexual relations.

http://www.henrymakow.com/is_porn_killing_sex.html

(left, The liberal media does a happy dance every time two marines kiss.)

2. Gender bending - the relentless media promotion of feminism, lesbianism and homosexuality is designed to destroy heterosexual identity and values, including marriage and family.

3. Incessant wars have no purpose other than to increase the wealth and power of the Illuminati and undermine nation states. All wars are contrived by the Illuminati to kill off natural leaders and demoralize, degrade and destroy humanity. Ironically, they are an excuse for Illuminati "world government."

4. Entertainers are members of the Illuminati and part of the Satanic initiation. Madonna's Superbowl half-time and Nicki Minaj's performance at the Grammy's were both Satanic rituals.

5. The dumbing down of the public through sports, entertainment and a defective education system.

My whole website is devoted to this topic. The point is -- mankind is satanically possessed.

CONCLUSION

The masses are in denial. Corruption and sexual abuse (e.g. Gerry Sandusky) abound but no one mentions Freemasonry. The legal system and police are compromised.

Society is a full accomplice in its own subversion. The masses have Stockholm syndrome. They hope that the psychopaths won't harm them if they keep their heads down and play along.

Fully invested in their enslavement, people are too venal, craven or dumb to face reality. They prove Aldous Huxley's prophesy that the slaves "will love their slavery."

Eventually the Illuminati will degrade us until humanity's promise is lost, and the Illuminati's depraved vision of man is vindicated. Then our culling under some pretext will seem like Divine Justice.

Our best hope is the Internet. It's very hard to institute a police state in an age of instant communication.

As long as the Internet is free, we will remain free. Let's defend it with our lives!

---

Related - Scientists Who Recognize Intelligent Design are Rejected

Related - Rejection of the Feminine is Rooted in the Occult

Will Newman - Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?

[Grorointeri]

Islamism/Zionism: The Hegelian Dialectic

###############
http://www.henrymakow.com/000558.html
#############

Following the dictates of Hegelian dialectic, the Globalists have created two antagonizing forces, the "Liberal-Democratic" Zionist West, against Terrorism, or "political Islam", to force us into the acceptance of their final alternative, a New World Order.

The West and Islam have had a long era of compatibility, but this history has been denied to foster the myth of a "Clash of Civilizations". In order to inflame the sentiments of the West against Islam, our attention has been focused on the specter of fanatical Wahhabism, and more specifically, its most notorious exponent, Ossama bin Laden.

However, as outlined in an excellent article by Peter Goodgame, "The Globalists and the Islamists" that the Globalists have had a hand in shaping and financing all the terrorist organizations of thetwentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, the Hamas of Palestine, and the Afghan Mujahideen. But the history of their duplicity dates farther back still, to the eighteenth century, when British Freemasons created the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia itself, to further their imperialistic objectives.

That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a Turkish work, Mir'at al-Haramain , by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century.

The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known document by the name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel, and later on in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English and other languages.

The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for his government, who sent him to the Middle East to discover ways to undermine the Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to promote were racism and nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication, and tempting Muslim women to uncover themselves.

But most important was the strategy to "insert heresies into Muslims' creedal tenets and then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror." To this purpose, Hempher located a particularly corrupt individual by the name of Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab.

To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it is first necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims, regardless of their race or nationality, to see themselves as brothers in faith. The killing of another Muslim was strictly forbidden. However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the British hoped to pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish brothers. The only way to do so was to find a loophole in Islamic law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as apostates.

Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to insinuate this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula. Basically, Wahhab contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act of offering prayers to saints, that their Turkish brethren had forfeited their faith, and therefore, that it was permitted to kill all who refused to adhere to his reforms, and enslave their women and children. But, that included the entire Muslim world, except for his small misguided band of followers.

But, the Wahabbi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of the Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from a Jewish merchant from Iraq . Orthodox jurists of the time branded the Wahhabis as heretics, and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance. Nevertheless, the Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for their pretended faith by indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then set about destroying all the holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the Prophet's treasure, which included holy books, works of art and innumerable priceless gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had destroyed were used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals.

The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in 1818, but the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal I. The movement was then somewhat restored until once again destroyed at the end of the nineteenth century.

After WWI, the former regions of the Ottoman Empire were divided into varying puppets regimes. For aiding to undermine the Ottoman authority in the region, Ibn Saud was duly rewarded with the creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in 1932. One year later, in 1933, the Saudis granted oil concessions to California Arabian Standard Oil Company (Casoc), affiliate of Standard Oil of California (Socal, today's Chevron), headed by Rothschild agent, and chief among Illuminati families, Rockefeller. Since that time, Saudi Arabia has been the most important ally to the West in the Middle East, not only providing ready access to its plentiful oil reserves, but also in tempering Arab aggression against Israel. Due to the evident hypocrisy of the regime, it has been necessary to suppress the ensuing dissent with brutality. Another important aspect has been preventing scholars from speaking of "politics", that is, to criticize the regime.

In The Two Faces of Islam, writes Schwartz, "Their tastes led them to taverns, casinos, brothels. . . . They bought fleets of automobiles, private jets, and yachts the size of warships. They invested in valuable Western art they did not understand or like and which often offended the sensitivities of Wahhabi clerics. They spent as they wished, becoming patrons of international sexual enslavement and the exploitation of children." The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be espousing Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have evolved a version of Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the religion, at the expense of helping to understand broader political realities. Their manner has encouraged a literal interpretation of Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to exploit the Koran to justify the killing of innocents.

Ultimately, the profusion of Rothschild financed petro-dollars in the coffers of the Saudi family has made it possible to for them to then propagandize their bastardized version of Islam to other parts of the world, most notably to America, where they purportedly subsidize up to 80 percent of the mosques in the country, a version of Islam that substitutes political awareness for dogmatic insistence of ritualistic fanaticism.

In 1999, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia attended the Bildeberg meeting, presumably to discuss his role in furthering the interests of world government, along with other such luminaries as Yasser Arafat and the Pope. Evidently, the Saudi family are part of the deceptive ploys of the Illuminati network. Their complicity in the accumulation of petro-dollars has gone into the financing of Global terrorism, from Afghanistan to Bosnia, merely for the purpose of fomenting the necessary animosity of the world against Islam.