[Abaronos]

Enter Hindu extremists who’ve spent the last few decades building an alliance with “israel,” and many have also set up shop in the US seeing Uncle Sam’s patronage. Read this article on Saffron dollars before proceeding. One such saffron simian is insurance agent Arish Sahani. I noticed this loon’s picture on Geller’s site and decided to investigate. This decrepit dung beetle fancies himself as sort of sort of Hindu heavyweight. He, along with some other extremist jokers set up a Hindus only “Indian American Intellectuals forum, “ which btw hasn’t been active in years, but you can still make a donation. I cut the DrM mukhabarat unit loose to do some intel on this fecal fascist, and what a goldmine of information he's left online. Sahani’s rantings are all over web, found on news sites, blogs, forums and extremist hate sites. He like the average Hindu fanatic wants a Hindu only India. To him, Every Indian Muslim is an Arab invader, and every Indian Christian is a subversive sent by the Pope. Pogrom’s against Muslims(Gujarat) and Christians(Orissa) are totally justified as far as he’s concerned. Not to mention the daily war crimes committed by Indian occupation terrorists in Kashmir. It’s perfectly acceptable for Hindu mobs to rape, mutilate and burn men, women and children alive. Sahani’s got a lot to say, none of which is relevant but is instructive for those curious about the gutter infested, callous mindset of Hindutva criminality and fascism. His membership in numerous Hindu extremist groups (RSS, VHP, BJP, Sang Parivar etc) isn’t surprising at all, and who btw were all inspired and great admirers of Hitler and Mussolini, and still revere them to this day. They also assassinated Mahatma Gandhi. That should make their Jewish allies of convenience feel real comfortable. Not that that matters to Judeofascists who have a long history of collaborating with Nazis, and Apartheid South Africa.
http://drmaxtor.blogspot.com/

[Abaronos]

Yoga Class: Anti-Muslim Propaganda, No To Namaaz
Forty newly-appointed teachers were sent for Yoga training at Matoshri Upasna Vidyapith at Kharodi (Mumbai) by the Municipal Education department. Out of 40, 12 were Muslim teachers who were shown a Video CD during camp.

The CD contained extremely objectionable remarks about Islam. Later when they asked for permission to go out for Friday namaaz, the person-in-charge handed them over a form and asked to give an undertaking that they will not perform namaaz or any other Islamic prayer during their stay at the camp.

Astonished, the teachers spoke to higher officials and questioned the link between Yoga and anti-Muslim propaganda or not letting them go for namaaz. The senior officials called back the Muslim teachers from the camp the same evening. Later the issue rocked the Mumbai Municipal Corporation’s education wing meet.

The secretary of Education Committee Mohan Kandalgaonkar brought up the issue. He alleged that had the Muslim teachers created a scene there, they would have been labelled militants. The Deputy Municipal Commissioner Nande and other officials later apologised and it was unanimously agreed upon that in future Muslim teachers would not be sent on such camps unless officials hold talks with the organisers of the camp.

Though the issue was resolved later but the question arises that how those at the Yoga training class decided to stop Muslims from prayers in this democratic country. And it was when the group had a dozen Muslims and the entire episode occured in Mumbai, not in a faraway town.

Adnan

(www.indscribe.blogspot.com)

[Abaronos]

http://www.islamhinduism.com/respons...ments-on-islam

The above is a video response to Swammy's diatribe.

[Abaronos]

Subrayumyum swamy is in trouble. he has had a case filed against him for his hate article:

New Delhi, Oct 3 (IANS) Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy Monday landed in trouble for his newspaper article, in which he suggested revoking of voting rights of Indian Muslims, with the Delhi Police filing a criminal case against him for spreading enmity between communities.
'We have registered a case under the relevant section of IPC. We are investigating the matter,' Deputy Commissioner of Police Ashok Chand, who heads the crime branch, told IANS.
Meanwhile, Swamy rubbished the charges against him, indicating it was a manifestation of political vendetta. 'I wrote the article in July. The FIR is filed in October. The motive seems to be my stand on 2G (spectrum scam),' he said.
Swamy had urged the Supreme Court to monitor the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) probe into the 2G spectrum allocation.
The 2G case cost then communications minister A. Raja his job and he finds himself in prison now, as also some executives of telecom firms.
Swamy had also asked the apex court to direct the CBI to probe the alleged role of Home Minister P. Chidambaram in the 2G allocation as the then finance minister.
Earlier, the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) had criticised Swamy's article with its chief Wajahat Habibullah describing the article as 'outrageous' and charged that it 'spread enmity and incited hatred'.
The Harvard-educated economics scholar, in the article 'How to wipe out Islamic terror' published on July 17 in the DNA, had suggested to Indian Hindus to collectively respond to terror acts.
'We need a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the Islamic terrorist... If any Muslim acknowledges his or her Hindu legacy, then we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj (greater Hindu society) which is Hindustan,' Swamy wrote in the July article.
'Others, who refuse to acknowledge this, or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration, can remain in India but should not have voting rights (which means they cannot be elected representatives),' he added in his edit page article.

[wowwieholmes]

Brother abu tamim, dont worry about whether or not its possible, we KNOW its going to happen:




From Hudhayfah that the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said:


تكون النبوة فيكم ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة ، فتكون ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم تكون ملكا عاضا ، فيكون ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم يكون ملكا جبريا ، فتكون ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة ، ثم سكت


The Prophethood will remain amongst you for as long as Allaah wills it to be. Then Allaah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be the khilaafah upon the Prophetic methodology. And it will last for as long as Allaah wills it to last. Then Allaah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be biting kingship, and it will remain for as long as Allaah wills it to remain. Then Allaah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be tyrannical (forceful) kingship and it will remain for as long as Allaah wills it to remain. Then He will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be a khilaafah upon the Prophetic methodology.
Then he (the Prophet) was silent.

Reported by Ahmad and Abu Dawud



Its just a case of how best to go about achieving it

[Fertassa]

Are we in the age of tryannicism according to the Hadith

[Abaronos]

Brother abu tamim, dont worry about whether or not its possible, we KNOW its going to happen:




From Hudhayfah that the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said:


تكون النبوة فيكم ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة ، فتكون ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم تكون ملكا عاضا ، فيكون ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم يكون ملكا جبريا ، فتكون ما شاء الله أن تكون ، ثم يرفعها إذا شاء أن يرفعها ، ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة ، ثم سكت


The Prophethood will remain amongst you for as long as Allaah wills it to be. Then Allaah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be the khilaafah upon the Prophetic methodology. And it will last for as long as Allaah wills it to last. Then Allaah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be biting kingship, and it will remain for as long as Allaah wills it to remain. Then Allaah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be tyrannical (forceful) kingship and it will remain for as long as Allaah wills it to remain. Then He will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be a khilaafah upon the Prophetic methodology.
Then he (the Prophet) was silent.

Reported by Ahmad and Abu Dawud



Its just a case of how best to go about achieving it

I'm sorry but I am a bit confused. are you talking of khilafa?

[Abaronos]

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Subram...e1-753096.aspx

[Abaronos]

This is in response to the inflammatory and jingoistic article written by Dr Subramanian Swamy which was published in DNA on July 16. I am 17 years old. I am not a Muslim. I am not a Christian. I was born a Hindu, but I am against religious fundamentalism of any kind because it breeds distrust and tears apart the social fabric of any country.

Some of Dr Swamy’s statements that I found objectionable were: “Muslims of India are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus.” And “Hindus cannot accept to be killed in this halal fashion, continuously bleeding every day till the nation finally collapses.”

Several similar statements of his promote a supremacist, bigoted, so-called Hindu agenda in a land where the Constitution allows complete freedom of religion. The last thing India needs in the wake of the recent tragedy (the Mumbai serial blasts) is the propagation of a Hindu state and denigration of the contribution and patriotism of over 150 million Muslims in the country, written by former cabinet minister, Dr Subramanian Swamy.

History bears testimony to the fact that dividing India along communal lines is fraught with the risk of national disintegration. I would like to remind Dr Swamy of thecontribution of the likes of Dr Abdul Kalam, Ustad Amjad Ali Khan, the Khans from Bollywood, AR Rahman and numerous other luminaries who happen to be Muslims and have been patriotic citizens of India!

“Undivided India in 1947 was 75% Hindu even after 800 years of brutal Islamic rule,” says Dr Swamy’s article. Mughal rulers like Akbar and Shahjahan were well known for their respect and tolerance of Hinduism. This statement highlights the fact that for over 800 years, India has remained largely secular and non-communal.

Dr Swamy lists five fundamental “goals” that terrorists have and offers solutions to combat them. I will list these goals, his solutions, my analysis of the flaws in them and suggest more meaningful solutions.

To combat the situation in Kashmir, Dr Swamy encourages the occupation of PoK and assisting Baluchis and Sindhis in attaining independence, should Pakistan continue to back terrorists. Life isn’t that easy. India and Pakistan are both nuclear powerhouses and risking a nuclear and conventional war would mean mass civilian casualties would be the consequences of such poorly conceived actions.

Wouldn’t this also breach the principles of “Ahimsa paramo dharmaha” - an essential tenet of Hinduism?

The solution to the problems in Indian Kashmir lie in the economic revival of Kashmir, infrastructure investments, improvements in education, healthcare, job and business opportunities, tourism, and a sense of belongingness towards India. You do not fight fire with fire; similarly, you do not combat one fundamentalist force with another.

*Dr Swamy believes that one of the main aims of terrorism is to target Hindu temples and kill Hindu devotees. His proposed solution to this is to “remove the masjid in Kashi Vishwanath temple and the 300 masjids at other temple sites”.

My firm belief is that this will only encourage cross-border terrorist elements towards even more heinous acts of terror. Such actions which are illegal and reprehensible would alienate even the moderates amongst the Indian Muslims. We are all aware of the mayhem that followed one Babri Masjid incident. Dr Swamy’s solution will only magnify the consequences manifold.

•?The third goal of the terrorists, according to Dr Swamy, is to turn India into Darul Islam. Dr Swamy’s solution is to rename India, Hindustan and declare it a Hindu Rashtra, wherein non-Hindus only have the right to vote if they “proudly acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus” and if they “feel for the Hindus”. This supposed solution is virulently fundamentalist and undemocratic.

Our Constitution clearly states that India affords to its citizens Liberty of Belief, Faith and Worship and Equality of Status and Opportunity. Dr. Swamy’s solution is in open violation of our Constitution.

• The fourth goal terrorists believe in, according to Dr Swamy, is to change India’s demography by illegal immigration, conversion and refusal to adopt family planning. His solution is to enact a law prohibiting conversion from Hinduism to any other religion and annex land from Bangladesh.

Dr Swamy seems to take foreign relations too lightly. India cannot infringe upon the sovereignty of another nation. This would compound the problem of terrorism manifold from another quarter! A more effective solution to this problem is enactment of a tighter border policy, like the USA did for its Mexican immigration problem.

•?Terrorists’ fifth goal, according to Dr Swamy, is to spread a propaganda against Hinduism in mosques and madrassas, and lead Hindus into capitulation. Dr. Swamy states boldly that the problem of terrorism can be solved within five years if we propagate the development of a Hindu mindset and defend the nation.

The problem with this vague “solution” is that terrorism is far too big a problem to be defeated by one government in five years! An actual solution to the problem would simply be in the socio-economic uplift of Muslim youth and their integration into mainstream economic activity.

The article then ends with Dr. Swamy urging Hindus to vote for a party that will promote a Hindu agenda so as to create a “democratic Hindustan”.

This sentence is a blatant contradiction in itself, as democracy refers to the principles of social equality, which this sentence violates in letter, spirit and intent. The Bhagvad Gita itself preaches tolerance and equality of all people. When the morale of the city is at its lowest, you don’t add more fuel to stoke the fire.

The solution to the problem of terrorism isn’t the adoption of a radical Hindu fundamentalist policy. It lies in stricter governmental security and intelligence policies. Since 9/11, there has not been a single terrorist attack on the USA. However, India has suffered from innumerable terrorist attacks in the same period. Did the US deny voting rights to non-Christians or discriminate against people of different faiths or ethnicities? Did the US destroy mosques? Did the US turn its back on the label it so proudly carries - “the Land of the Free”? Certainly not.

The US just adopted a stricter homeland security policy and increased intelligence.

In this hour of crisis, we Indians need to exercise restraint and not get swayed by extreme fundamentalist rhetoric of any kind. We need to ensure that our society and our government acts with firmness in combating the scourge of terrorism espoused by anti-national elements.

Dr Swamy, I do not know whether the Harvard Business School and the scores of students whom you have taught, would be proud of your article from a humanist, secular and democratic perspective. Why did you not espouse such virulent causes in your many years as a policymaker, Parliamentarian and Cabinet minister of the Union of India?
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/commen...th-you_1566760

[Peabelilt]

Not only that, it is physically impossible considering the extent to which the ummah is spread across the globe.

Why can't people grasp this SIMPLE fact ^ ''physically impossible''? Are they intellectually challenged or something?

[Abaronos]

Why can't people grasp this SIMPLE fact ^ ''physically impossible''? Are they intellectually challenged or something?

They are hopeful..sometimes excessively so.

[Abaronos]

The Dog Has Gone Rabid:

By Md. Ali, TwoCircles.net,

New Delhi: Subramanian Swamy has filed an FIR against the UPA chief Sonia Gandhi and members of the National Advisory Council (NAC), for “committing offenses of propagating hate” against the Hindu community of India, by drafting the Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill 2011.

In his written complaint to the Station House Officer of Sector 18 Rohini, Crime Branch, New Delhi, Swamy has alleged that Mrs. Gandhi and the NAC members, through the bill, have sought to target Hindus of India by “inciting crimes against the Hindu with impunity.”

Swamy alleges that by aiming to incite hatred against the Hindu community, the NAC, with Ms Sonia Gandhi as Chairperson, and other members have jointly committed offences like 153A & B, 295A and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

Explaining his objections against the bill, the Janata Party chief has alleged that the Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill is essentially a manifestation of the NAC’s views that the “majority community – read Hindus – are the perpetrators of communal violence in India and the minority – read Muslims and Christians – are the victims.”

This assumption has also been alleged by Swamy, to be an “incitement of religious and communal strife” which in turn is a crime under the IPC.

Terming the Bill to be a “threat” to national integration, social harmony and constitutional federalism, Swamy has accused the “scriptwriters of this bill” NAC in this case, of “religious bias” against Hindus.

The complaint specially mentions the All India Christian Council (AICC) and the Joint Committee of Muslim Organizations for Empowerment (JCMOE) as the organizations which pushed for the bill.

Referring to AICC and JCMOE, Swamy alleges that, these two organizations consider only the Christians and Muslims as the “generally targeted” victims of communal violence; and they wanted that the word ‘communal violence’ be re-defined in such a way that only the Muslims and Christians are treated as victims and Hindus as predators.

Swamy finds the Bill to be a ploy to empower the Central Government to invoke Article 355 and 356 of the Constitution against any state in the event of any communal violence.

Swamy has also alleged that the Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill 2011, once passed, will only be exploited by organizations like LeT and HuJI.

In his complaint, Swamy has asked the authorities to do a through “investigation into the communal mentality’ of the NAC chairperson Ms. Sonia Gandhi and other members and take necessary action under the law to prosecute the offenders under the cited sections of the IPC.

http://twocircles.net/2011oct27/swam...%E2%80%9D.html

[Abaronos]

The Dog will not bark at Harvard anymore:


By IANS,

Washington : Harvard University has cancelled Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy's summer courses over his controversial article in a Mumbai newspaper advocating destruction of hundreds of Indian mosques and disenfranchisement of non-Hindus in India.

After a heated debate, a meeting of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Tuesday voted to remove two Summer School courses - Economics S-110 and Economics S-1316 - taught by Swamy, according to The Harvard Crimson, the campus newspaper.

Swamy received significant criticism for his op-ed last summer in Daily News and Analysis calling for the destruction of mosques, the disenfranchisement of non-Hindus in India who do not acknowledge Hindu ancestry, and a ban on conversion from Hinduism, it said.

"Swamy's op-ed clearly crosses the line by demonising an entire religious community and calling for violence against their sacred places," Comparative Religion Professor Diana L. Eck was quoted as saying.

Harvard has a moral responsibility not to affiliate itself with anyone who expresses hatred towards a minority group, she said. "There is a distinction between unpopular and unwelcome political views."

Although Harvard chose to stand by Swamy in August in an effort to affirm its declared commitment to free speech, faculty members shot down his two courses, effectively removing him from Harvard's teaching roster, the campus paper said.

Many faculty determined Swamy's article was not a product of free speech-but of hate speech.

"[Swamy's position on disenfranchisement] is like saying Jewish Americans and African Americans should not be allowed to vote unless they acknowledge the supremacy of white Anglo Saxon Protestants," said History professor Sugata Bose.

Dean of the Summer School Donald H. Pfister explained that courses included in the Harvard catalogue are chosen by individual departments.


http://twocircles.net/2011dec08/harv...s_courses.html

[cigsstorenick]

No worries bro, soon it will be time for Ghazwatul Hind, when Allah wills...

[Abaronos]

No worries bro, soon it will be time for Ghazwatul Hind, when Allah wills...

akhi.
Till then, let more and more enemies of Islam get their comeuppance, what?

[mrPronmaker]

Assalamu alaykum

Similar news:

The Harvard University has removed economics courses taught by Janta Party leader Subramanian Swamy.
The decision was taken following a heated debate after two Indian students on campus submitted a petition with 450 signatures against him.
The uproar is over an op-ed article Swamy wrote in the DNA newspaper in July calling for the disfranchisement of non-Hindus who do not acknowledge Hindu ancestry and a ban on conversion among other contentious demands.
Swamy, who got his PhD in Economics in 1965 from Harvard, served as an Associate professor.
Swamy reacted to the news by saying, "Howard has established a principal that the person teaching there is accountable to whatever he writes elsewhere is a not good for them."
While Harvard sided with Swamy on the principle of free speech, one professor who moved the amendment said, "Harvard has a moral responsibility not to affiliate itself with anyone who expresses hatred towards a minority group."
At the meeting of Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, faculty members voted with an "overwhelming majority" to remove two economics courses - 'Quantitative Methods in Economics and Business' and 'Economic Development in India and East Asia' - that Swamy teaches at the three-month Harvard Summer School session.

[Abaronos]

Assalamu alaykum

Similar news:

The Harvard University has removed economics courses taught by Janta Party leader Subramanian Swamy.
The decision was taken following a heated debate after two Indian students on campus submitted a petition with 450 signatures against him.
The uproar is over an op-ed article Swamy wrote in the DNA newspaper in July calling for the disfranchisement of non-Hindus who do not acknowledge Hindu ancestry and a ban on conversion among other contentious demands.
Swamy, who got his PhD in Economics in 1965 from Harvard, served as an Associate professor.
Swamy reacted to the news by saying, "Howard has established a principal that the person teaching there is accountable to whatever he writes elsewhere is a not good for them."
While Harvard sided with Swamy on the principle of free speech, one professor who moved the amendment said, "Harvard has a moral responsibility not to affiliate itself with anyone who expresses hatred towards a minority group."
At the meeting of Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, faculty members voted with an "overwhelming majority" to remove two economics courses - 'Quantitative Methods in Economics and Business' and 'Economic Development in India and East Asia' - that Swamy teaches at the three-month Harvard Summer School session.