[Appeselve]

The author below failed to mention the issue of riba ( interest). The Islamic court will not tolerate interest based banking.

#########
http://www.infowars.com/us-backed-et...somalia-again/
############


There’s an unmistakably historical irony to this. It was Ethiopia – with the tacit support of an overly-paranoid United States – that created the conditions for Al Shabaab to prosper. In the early 2000s, Somalia was mostly – but not completely – under the loose control of the Union of Islamic Courts, a relatively moderate Islamic group which was slowly bringing some semblance of stability and security to a country that hadn’t known peace for decades. But the Islamic Courts soon earned the wrath of the United States, which saw in its emphasis on Islamic law a strong link with terrorism. This was near the beginning of the War on Terror, and the United States still had not made the distinction between the moderate if conservative Islam of groups like the Islamic Courts and, to an extent, Hamas in Palestine, and the militant, almost anarchic fundamentalism of Al Qaeda.

[Tveabuti]

Brother Pawlak,

It was not just bankers who disrupted the UIC rule in Somalia. You are mistaken to narrow the accountability only to 'bankers'. They are merely a powerful segment of the entire kafir global power.

In any case, the UIC showed the weakness of coalitions and when a coalition of Islamic groups lack a consistent culture and idea, they succumb to outside pressure, like a foreign invasion.

This is an important lesson for the believers.

[bumxumer]

Brother Pawlak,

It was not just bankers who disrupted the UIC rule in Somalia. You are mistaken to narrow the accountability only to 'bankers'. They are merely a powerful segment of the entire kafir global power.

In any case, the UIC showed the weakness of coalitions and when a coalition of Islamic groups lack a consistent culture and idea, they succumb to outside pressure, like a foreign invasion.

This is an important lesson for the believers.

Lessons Learned