[RerRoktoido]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSZYcxSqtp4

Anyone care to rebut?

[Meerenuch]

I wanted to make a thread about the some questions about Al Muhannad since the last few days. The questions were put forward by a Barelvi to me and i think someone well versed in the texts of the Akabir of Deoband like br Saad should respond to these questions. The questions breifly are as following.

1.Allamah Sayyid Barzanji did the independent Takfir on the basis of a few lines of Tahzir Ul Naas and this Takfir substantiates the claims of Raza khan and makes raza khan free of the allegations that he misquoted the Akabir of Deoband infront of the scholars of Haramain to take a Fatwa which was later published as Hassam al Haramain.

2.Who were the scholars who asked these 26 questions and why were not their names mentioned ? (He is trying to say that the whole book Al-Muhannad Alal Mufannad is a forgery in which some self created questions were answered to annul the effects of Hassam ul Haramain. If its not a self made document then which independent sources varify them?)

3. If Hussain Ahmad Madani rahimahullah was in Hijjaz during the days when raza khan obtained the Fatwa of Takfeer against the Akabir of Deoband , why did not he show up when the whole of this process was taking place?He could prove raza khan wrong infront of Ulama e Haramain if raza khan was misqouting the Deobandi Akabireen. Why would it take so much time for Deobandis to come up with a refutation?

[Dildos]

I wanted to make a thread about the some questions about Al Muhannad since the last few days. The questions were put forward by a Barelvi to me and i think someone well versed in the texts of the Akabir of Deoband like br Saad should respond to these questions. The questions breifly are as following.

1.Allamah Sayyid Barzanji did the independent Takfir on the basis of a few lines of Tahzir Ul Naas and this Takfir substantiates the claims of Raza khan and makes raza khan free of the allegations that he misquoted the Akabir of Deoband infront of the scholars of Haramain to take a Fatwa which was later published as Hassam al Haramain.

2.Who were the scholars who asked these 26 questions and why were not their names mentioned ? (He is trying to say that the whole book Al-Muhannad Alal Mufannad is a forgery in which some self created questions were answered to annul the effects of Hassam ul Haramain. If its not a self made document then which independent sources varify them?)

3. If Hussain Ahmad Madani rahimahullah was in Hijjaz during the days when raza khan obtained the Fatwa of Takfeer against the Akabir of Deoband , why did not he show up when the whole of this process was taking place?He could prove raza khan wrong infront of Ulama e Haramain if raza khan was misqouting the Deobandi Akabireen. Why would it take so much time for Deobandis to come up with a refutation?

(1) By now, if I am not mistaken, Al Muhannad goes by the the name Aqa-id-e-Ulama-e-Deoband. This clarifies the beliefs of our Scholars. Question is whether the fatwa by Allamah Sayyid Barzanji still applicable after that?

(2) Maulana Madani (RA) not responding to the allegation during the fermentation stage has a simpler explanation-Raza Khan, as we understand till now, was operating surreptitiously.