Reply to Thread New Thread |
07-12-2011, 01:32 AM | #1 |
|
Does anyone find any similarity between Libyan crisis and the Afgan war against Soviet
invasion ? The Western nations are providing free weapons to the Libyan rebels . Out of love ? ################### France arms anti-Gaddafi forces http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=25497 France this week acknowledged that it had supplied weapons to oppositionists fighting Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s forces in Libya. Le Figaro said that the consignment consisted of “rocket launchers, assault rifles, machine guns, and anti-tank missiles.” The weapons were dropped by parachute to opposition fighters—mainly Berbers—in the Nafusa Mountains, western Libya on the border with Tunisia. The move was opposed by Russia, China, and India. Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin said it meant that “individual NATO countries have basically started giving direct military aid to one of the warring sides,” and that it constituted “direct interference in an internal conflict.” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said it represented a “flagrant violation” of United National Security Council Resolution 1970, which imposed an arms embargo on Libya in February. It preceded the March 17 UN Security Council Resolution 1973, which imposed a no-fly zone and sanctioned war based on the claim that its purpose was protecting civilians. The African Union also condemned the weapons drop. AU Commission Chief Jean Ping said that move increased the “risk of civil war, risk of partition of the country, the risk of Somalia-sation of the country, risk of having arms everywhere... with terrorism”, which would be of “concern [to] the neighbouring countries.” This was rejected by France’s UN ambassador Gerard Araud, who declared: “we decided to provide self-defence weapons to the civilian populations because we considered these populations were under threat.” French military spokesman Colonel Thierry Burkhard argued that the supplies consisted only of “self-defence assets,” and that only “light munitions and weapons” were involved. ################# |
|
07-23-2011, 11:52 AM | #2 |
|
Islam is also used as a tool to turn Somalia into a failed state. A though-provoking insight from Globalresearch is shown below.
################ http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=25725 ################ Somalia is categorized as a "failed state", a country without a government. But how did it become a "failed state"? There is ample evidence of foreign intervention as well as covert support of armed militia groups. Triggering "failed states" is an integral part of US foreign policy. It is part of a military-intelligence agenda. According to the UN, a situation of famine prevails in southern Bakool and Lower Shabelle, areas in part controlled by Al Shahab, a jihadist militia group affiliated to Al Qaeda. Both the UN and the Obama administration had accused Al Shahab of imposing "a ban on foreign aid agencies in its territories in 2009". What the reports do not mention, however, is that Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen (HSM) ("Movement of Striving Youth") is funded by Saudi Arabia and supported covertly by Western intelligence agencies. The backing of Islamic militia by Western intelligence agencies is part of a broader historical pattern of covert support to Al Qaeda affiliated and jihadist organizations in a number of countries, including, more recently, Libya and Syria. ############### Of couse , you will find many sincere people joining those Islamic militia. But , they are simply dupes !! |
|
07-26-2011, 03:43 AM | #3 |
|
Soviet invasion into Afganistan seems to be planned to split USSR into several states which will slowly be merged with NWO --world government.
The comment below shows this. All those funding for Mujahedin groups from Pakistan and UK through Pakistani Secret sevice (ISI) and MI6 are simply part of the great game. Those Islamic warriors are used just as cannon-fodders !!! ################################ http://www.henrymakow.com/default-dont_put_it.html Wow. People should pay attention when Brzezeniski rolls out to say these things because he's got a documented track record of chaos creation that goes back 35 years. Who created the Taliban, Al Qaeda? Who toppled the Soviet Union? Zbiggy. Brzezinski, that's who. Remember Zbigniew Brzezinski doing a speaking tour in Jan-Feb 2009 predicting "class warfare" riots in U.S. cities? Keep in mind this is the man who said to an elite audience that same year ""To put it *pungently*: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu8Nd7xuix4 Brzezinski has also taken credit for engineering luring the Soviets into the quagmire in Afghanistan that vaporized the Soviet economy, resulted in the famous 1980's scarcity of goods in the USSR, that helped fellow Knight of Malta Mikhail Gorbechev collapse the Soviet government. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKzEpQc-yo8 Why don't people see that when someone of Brzezenski's background speaks he's not using tarot cards to predict urban unrest. In 2008-2009 street riots were the last things on anybody's minds in America, because never in history had Americans trusted Uncle Sam to either restore exponential prosperity, or subsidize them. ####################### |
|
11-25-2011, 02:17 AM | #4 |
|
Libyan Rebels Fought the Globalists' War
How the Devil paid. ############# http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/20...lists-war.html ########### by Tony Cartalucci Editor's Note: This is an update from an April 20, 2011 article titled, "Libyan Rebels Fighting the Globalists' War: How the Devil Pays." November 25, 2011 - In April 2011, it was written: "After rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi [aka Hakim Belhaj] admitted to being trained in Afghanistan and subsequently fighting American troops there, and admitting many of the rebel fighters now joining him in Libya had similarly returned from Afghanistan as well as Iraq, it must strike them as tremendous irony that the same Americans they were filling pine boxes with overseas, are now protecting their lives and handing them an entire country to rule over. Of course in life, nothing is quite that simple. The rebels seem to forget that just months ago Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi was also the recipient of similarly ironic support from the West. In the end, it appears it was merely a ploy to disarm and infiltrate Qaddafi's regime ahead of a US funded, armed, and supported militant uprising. The betrayal does not end there, with the militant rebels in tanks and fighter jets, brandishing newly procured weaponry flowing over the Egyptian border with Washington's full knowledge and in direct violation of UNSC r.1973, the corporate owned media has continuously branded these militants as Libyan "civilians" and Qaddafi's attempts to restore order in his country as an inhumane "massacre." The intent is to fully justify any means necessary to remove Qaddafi from power, and so the rebels think, hand the country and its riches over to the green shoots of democracy led by the valiant Al Qaeda-linked militants that toppled a tyrant. What woeful ignorance." It seems that in due time, the folly of Libya's rebels has been completely realized. After it was revealed that the newly unelected "PM" of Libya, Abdurrahim el-Keib, is in fact a long time servant of Western powers, in particular, oil giants British Petroleum (BP), Shell, France's Total, the Japan Oil Development Company, and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, it is now revealed that his government is moving swiftly to exclude the most vicious fighters involved in his NATO-backed ascension to power. The Guardian has reported this week that Al-Qaeda/LIFG commander Hakim Bilhaj has been excluded as defense minister from el-Keib's cabinet in favor of Osama al-Juwali, chief of the Zintan military council. The Guardian's article is literally titled, "Libyan PM snubs Islamists with cabinet to please western backers," and could provide no better bookend for April 2011's analysis as to the true nature of Western power projection and the betrayal that awaits all who help propel it along. Belhaj's well-being is now related directly proportional to the resistance he puts up to his predetermined fate. Should he decide to hang up his hat as a mass-murdering terrorist and quietly disappear, he may live a long, uneventful life. Should he attempt to contest his betrayal, the same fate met by those he helped remove from power will be his own. El-Keib's days are also numbered should he stray from the path laid before him by Wall Street and London. Knowing this would give those like Belhaj and others seeking power the perfect opportunity to test his resolve in executing the West's directives in the face of a mobilized Libyan opposition. Should el-Keib heed the anger of his people, he will be the next one hiding in Tripoli's tunnels from NATO bombs. Conversely, should he decide to crush the will of the Libyan people and those being shunted out of power, NATO's ground troops may still make landfall to provide "stabilization" while el-Keib carries out his treacherous work. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|