LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-04-2009, 05:47 PM   #1
tetMitshisk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default painting of the Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) on Wikipedia
Assalaam-wa-Alaikum

This is a petition request: Wikipedia has placed a painting of the Prophet Muaahammad (P.B.U.H) on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad.

They need about 100,000 signatures to remove it. So far a little over 48,000 have signed; if you agree that it is wrong to depict his picture, please sign the petition.

Here's the link.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mjk123/petition.html

Jazakallahu Khairun
tetMitshisk is offline


Old 03-04-2009, 10:24 PM   #2
casinoboneerer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Assalaam-wa-Alaikum

This is a petition request: Wikipedia has placed a painting of the Prophet Muaahammad (P.B.U.H) on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad.

They need about 100,000 signatures to remove it. So far a little over 48,000 have signed; if you agree that it is wrong to depict his picture, please sign the petition.

Here's the link.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mjk123/petition.html

Jazakallahu Khairun
Asalaamualaykum.



We all know that doesnt represent sayyiduna Muhammad [saw] i suggest you spend time doing something possitave instead of whining about some silly painting , you know sayyiduna Muhammad [saw] is also depicted in the suprime law court in USA holding a quran how come no one whines about that?

http://www.geocities.com/khola_mon/Mohammad1a.JPG

http://mentalfloss.cachefly.net/wp-c...medincourt.jpg

the none muslims are laughing at us with this sillyness over cartoons and pictures and just remember the kuffar love this kinda thing as it adds fuel to the whole situation.

With sincere adab and respect your brother in islam, ma salaama
casinoboneerer is offline


Old 03-04-2009, 10:32 PM   #3
YTmWSOA5

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Salam,

They need about 100,000 signatures to remove it. So far a little over 48,000 have signed; if you agree that it is wrong to depict his picture, please sign the petition. Is there any way we can have an opinion other than "it is wrong"?

As a side question, how was it possible for certain Muslims to paint exactly these types of "miniature" paintings supposedly of our Prophet (SAW)?
YTmWSOA5 is offline


Old 03-05-2009, 03:57 AM   #4
diplmixxxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Salam,



Is there any way we can have an opinion other than "it is wrong"?

As a side question, how was it possible for certain Muslims to paint exactly these types of "miniature" paintings supposedly of our Prophet (SAW)?
These paintings were done by shias, who beleive you can paint a picture of someone only after they have died, (not saying Rasoolullah (SAW) is dead)

If you notice, all of the ancient painted depictions of Him SAW are painted in a persian style

Ironicly, the Arbic version of that wikipedia page has no painting anywhere on it.
diplmixxxx is offline


Old 03-05-2009, 09:11 AM   #5
YTmWSOA5

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
These paintings were done by shias, who beleive you can paint a picture of someone only after they have died, (not saying Rasoolullah (SAW) is dead)

If you notice, all of the ancient painted depictions of Him SAW are painted in a persian style

Ironicly, the Arbic version of that wikipedia page has no painting anywhere on it. I just wanted to be sure about this, since upto the Saffawi empire, Persia had a much larger Sunni population than it has now, and this has been used as "proof" by Shias that these paintings must have been done by Sunnis.
YTmWSOA5 is offline


Old 03-05-2009, 10:55 PM   #6
diplmixxxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
If shias Say We did it and We say Shias did, than that means we ALL hate them and the originals should be destroyed

I wonder why they havent been destroyed yet?
diplmixxxx is offline


Old 08-20-2011, 07:13 PM   #7
entaifsfets

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default


Wikipedia is launching a referendum/poll on a opt-in personal image hiding feature that may include religious/ofensive contents. You can vote if you have at least 10 contributions as of August 1st.

More at : http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.ph.../en&uselang=en
entaifsfets is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity