LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-23-2013, 07:54 AM   #1
derinasderun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default What do the scholars/historians say regarding sharif hussain and the ottomans?
From the prior thread: week ajeeb article by matbooh...ajeeb...my dad was asked by the jordanians and terrorized for over 1. He explained they're worse compared to jews....the sharif of hussain. Enough could be stated that he was a traitor. Before anybody draws out the syed card and makes a reason for the his descendents and fool the silly abdullah of jordon he was liable for the imprisonment and capture of syed husain ahmed madni and syed uzair gul rh along side shaykh ul rear. One of the folks of this community nayyarsh is from the household of syed uzair gul and he'll let you know more concerning the treachery of sharif hussain. I'd anyday reside in saudi arabia over jordon. Evaluate both nations and visit a world of difference. Jordan doesn't use deen to justify it self? Is that why the ahle baitt basis pops up with bogus material constantly with the most popular term etc....The king of jordan has overtly spoken out against shariah. Guy matbooh significantly you'll need to live in jordan for some time and then live in saudi. The jordanian mukabarat are dogs....... i was not conscious that sharif hussain bore some responsibility for the record of Shaikhul hind..this is information in my experience. I do want to learn more about him. In the beginning I believed he was of great character and was an excellent student an such like. but had differences with the turks which result in his battle with them. then i learned from my loved ones, he was a power hungry man who ostensibly seized power for himself and betrayed the turks within their time of weakness. what's the entire truth of the story? n.b. I have study all of the wikipedia posts however they lack lots of information. also i observed "lwarence of arabia" along time before and for the reason that film they illustrate the arab practitioners as "freedom fighters" who are fundamentally recovering their independence from the turks who've been denying them training, making them in to poverty and other such things.....is there any truth for this? do the ottomans viewed by the arabs of today with bitterness? br. tripoly sunni your opinions could be greatly appreciated.
derinasderun is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity